These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

68 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1619350)

  • 1. The truth about mammography.
    Aaron JO
    J Ky Med Assoc; 1992 Jun; 90(6):305. PubMed ID: 1619350
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Should mammography screening be promoted if quality assurance is lacking?
    Barmus B
    Public Health Rep; 1993; 108(1):135. PubMed ID: 8434090
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [The quality of mammography scrutinized. Ongoing control mass screenings for breast cancer is necessary].
    Andersson I; Rydén S; Karlberg I
    Lakartidningen; 1995 Aug; 92(35):3106-9. PubMed ID: 7658762
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Quality assurance in Trent Regional Health Authority's breast screening programme.
    Thornhill P
    Radiogr Today; 1990 Apr; 56(635):11-3. PubMed ID: 2363814
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Guidelines for pathology--supplement to European guidelines for quality assurance in mammography screening. Report by the Pathology Working Group of the European Community].
    Sloane JP; Amendoeira I; Apostolikas N; Bellocq JP; Bianchi S; Böcker W; Bussolati G; Connolly CE; De Miguel C; Dervan P; Drijkoningen R; Elston CW; Faverly D; Gad A; Holland R; Jacquemier J; Lacerda M; Lindgren A; Martinez-Peñuela J; Peterse JL; Rank F; Tsakraklides V; de Wolf C; Zafrani B
    Pathologe; 1997 Jan; 18(1):71-88. PubMed ID: 9157408
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [German Mammography Study: commission, cooperative structure, results and consequences].
    Robra BP; Swart E; Dierks ML
    Z Arztl Fortbild Qualitatssich; 1997 Sep; 91(6):541-2. PubMed ID: 9441030
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [What is the benefit of screening for breast cancer? Contra].
    Schmidt JG
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 1996; 259 Suppl 1():S178-98. PubMed ID: 9133272
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Breast cancer--screening data for assessing quality of services--New York, 2000-2003.
    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)
    MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep; 2004 Jun; 53(21):455-7. PubMed ID: 15175570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Organized breast cancer screening: experience at Bouches-du-Rhône].
    Seradour B
    Bull Acad Natl Med; 1998; 182(8):1665-7. PubMed ID: 10188312
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Stat bite: Frequency of breast cancer screening by health plan, 2000-2003.
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2004 Nov; 96(22):1657. PubMed ID: 15547177
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Streamlining mobile mammography services. Concern over loss of quality.
    McCue P
    Appl Radiol; 1987 Dec; 16(12):27-8, 30-1. PubMed ID: 10285605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Outcome measures of an Australian breast-screening program.
    Rodger A; Kavanagh AM
    Med J Aust; 1998 Aug; 169(4):179-80. PubMed ID: 9734571
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [What kind of information do German health information pamphlets provide on mammography screening?].
    Kurzenhäuser S
    Z Arztl Fortbild Qualitatssich; 2003 Feb; 97(1):53-7. PubMed ID: 12669690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Screening strategies aim to increase compliance.
    Bassett LW
    Diagn Imaging (San Franc); 1991 Sep; 13(9):75-9, 165. PubMed ID: 10149733
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Breast cancer screening. In search of more quality].
    Wegner A
    MMW Fortschr Med; 2001 Jun; 143(23):12. PubMed ID: 11460411
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Who's monitoring the quality of mammograms? The Mammography Quality Standards Act of 1992 could finally provide the answer.
    Cocca SV
    Am J Law Med; 1993; 19(3):313-44. PubMed ID: 8010307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluation of effectiveness of quality-assured mammography screening in Germany: sample size considerations and design options.
    Becker N; Hakama M; Nyström L
    Eur J Cancer Prev; 2007 Jun; 16(3):225-31. PubMed ID: 17415093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Screening mammography in the Tampa Bay area: current status and implications for the next decade.
    Clark RA; King PS; Cox CE; Bromley J; Mauer K
    J Fla Med Assoc; 1989 May; 76(5):449-53. PubMed ID: 2614349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [European recommendations for quality assurance in the setting of mammographic screening for breast cancer. Report of pathologists of the working group "Breast Cancer Screening" of the European Union].
    Ann Pathol; 1996 Nov; 16(5):315-33. PubMed ID: 9004719
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Film-screen combinations for mammography].
    Säbel M; Aichinger H
    Aktuelle Radiol; 1991 May; 1(3):105-12. PubMed ID: 1878377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.