These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
267 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16193685)
1. Clinical importance of the lens opacities classification system III (LOCS III) in phacoemulsification. Bencić G; Zorić-Geber M; Sarić D; Corak M; Mandić Z Coll Antropol; 2005; 29 Suppl 1():91-4. PubMed ID: 16193685 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Clinical application of the lens opacities classification system III in the performance of phacoemulsification. Davison JA; Chylack LT J Cataract Refract Surg; 2003 Jan; 29(1):138-45. PubMed ID: 12551681 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Clinical application of a Scheimpflug system for lens density measurements in phacoemulsification. Kim JS; Chung SH; Joo CK J Cataract Refract Surg; 2009 Jul; 35(7):1204-9. PubMed ID: 19545809 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Correlation of lens density measured using the Pentacam Scheimpflug system with the Lens Opacities Classification System III grading score and visual acuity in age-related nuclear cataract. Pei X; Bao Y; Chen Y; Li X Br J Ophthalmol; 2008 Nov; 92(11):1471-5. PubMed ID: 18586899 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Correlation of nuclear cataract lens density using Scheimpflug images with Lens Opacities Classification System III and visual function. Grewal DS; Brar GS; Grewal SP Ophthalmology; 2009 Aug; 116(8):1436-43. PubMed ID: 19500847 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The effect of cataract severity and morphology on the reliability of the Lens Opacities Classification System II (LOCS II). Maraini G; Pasquini P; Sperduto RD; Bonacini M; Carrieri MP; Corona R; Graziosi P; Tomba MC; Williams SL Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1991 Jul; 32(8):2400-3. PubMed ID: 2071351 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Reading performance depending on the type of cataract and its predictability on the visual outcome. Stifter E; Sacu S; Weghaupt H; König F; Richter-Müksch S; Thaler A; Velikay-Parel M; Radner W J Cataract Refract Surg; 2004 Jun; 30(6):1259-67. PubMed ID: 15177601 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Determining factors for corneal endothelial cell loss by using bimanual microincision phacoemulsification and power modulation. Mathys KC; Cohen KL; Armstrong BD Cornea; 2007 Oct; 26(9):1049-55. PubMed ID: 17893532 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Ultrasonic power reduction during phacoemulsification using adjunctive NeoSoniX technology. Davison JA J Cataract Refract Surg; 2005 May; 31(5):1015-9. PubMed ID: 15975472 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of methods to identify incident cataract in eyes of patients with neovascular maculopathy: Submacular Surgery Trials Report No. 18. ; Mann AL; Bressler SB; Hawkins BS; Holekamp N; Bressler NM Ophthalmology; 2008 Jan; 115(1):127-33. PubMed ID: 17574675 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Corneal endothelial cell loss after cataract extraction by using ultrasound phacoemulsification versus a fluid-based system. Richard J; Hoffart L; Chavane F; Ridings B; Conrath J Cornea; 2008 Jan; 27(1):17-21. PubMed ID: 18245961 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Impairment of visual acuity and reading performance and the relationship with cataract type and density. Stifter E; Sacu S; Benesch T; Weghaupt H Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2005 Jun; 46(6):2071-5. PubMed ID: 15914625 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Grading nuclear, cortical and posterior subcapsular cataracts using an objective scatter index measured with a double-pass system. Vilaseca M; Romero MJ; Arjona M; Luque SO; Ondategui JC; Salvador A; Güell JL; Artal P; Pujol J Br J Ophthalmol; 2012 Sep; 96(9):1204-10. PubMed ID: 22790434 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Strategies for measuring the rate of age-related cataract formation in vivo. Chylack LT; Leske MC; Khu P; McCarthy D; Wu SY Lens Eye Toxic Res; 1989; 6(4):515-22. PubMed ID: 2487269 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparability of subjective and objective measurements of nuclear density in cataract patients. Makhotkina NY; Berendschot TTJM; van den Biggelaar FJHM; Weik ARH; Nuijts RMMA Acta Ophthalmol; 2018 Jun; 96(4):356-363. PubMed ID: 29575599 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Contrast acuity in cataracts of different morphology and association to self-reported visual function. Stifter E; Sacu S; Thaler A; Weghaupt H Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2006 Dec; 47(12):5412-22. PubMed ID: 17122131 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Lens Opacities Classification System III: cataract grading variability between junior and senior staff at a Singapore hospital. Tan AC; Loon SC; Choi H; Thean L J Cataract Refract Surg; 2008 Nov; 34(11):1948-52. PubMed ID: 19006743 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Noncontact specular microscopy of human lens epithelium. Balaram M; Tung WH; Kuszak JR; Ayaki M; Shinohara T; Chylack LT Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2000 Feb; 41(2):474-81. PubMed ID: 10670478 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The Lens Opacities Classification System III. The Longitudinal Study of Cataract Study Group. Chylack LT; Wolfe JK; Singer DM; Leske MC; Bullimore MA; Bailey IL; Friend J; McCarthy D; Wu SY Arch Ophthalmol; 1993 Jun; 111(6):831-6. PubMed ID: 8512486 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Correlation among lens opacities classification system III grading, visual function index-14, pentacam nucleus staging, and objective scatter index for cataract assessment. Pan AP; Wang QM; Huang F; Huang JH; Bao FJ; Yu AY Am J Ophthalmol; 2015 Feb; 159(2):241-7.e2. PubMed ID: 25448993 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]