These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

256 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16193782)

  • 21. Analytical equations for CT dose profiles derived using a scatter kernel of Monte Carlo parentage with broad applicability to CT dosimetry problems.
    Dixon RL; Boone JM
    Med Phys; 2011 Jul; 38(7):4251-64. PubMed ID: 21859027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Perfusion CT of the Brain and Liver and of Lung Tumors: Use of Monte Carlo Simulation for Patient Dose Estimation for Examinations With a Cone-Beam 320-MDCT Scanner.
    Cros M; Geleijns J; Joemai RM; Salvadó M
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2016 Jan; 206(1):129-35. PubMed ID: 26700344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. CT dosimetry: getting the best from the adult Cristy phantom.
    Castellano IA; Dance DR; Evans PM
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):321-5. PubMed ID: 15933130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Monte carlo simulations of dose from microCT imaging procedures in a realistic mouse phantom.
    Taschereau R; Chow PL; Chatziioannou AF
    Med Phys; 2006 Jan; 33(1):216-24. PubMed ID: 16485428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Validation of a Monte Carlo tool for patient-specific dose simulations in multi-slice computed tomography.
    Deak P; van Straten M; Shrimpton PC; Zankl M; Kalender WA
    Eur Radiol; 2008 Apr; 18(4):759-72. PubMed ID: 18066555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Monte Carlo calculation of radiation dose in CT examinations using phantom and patient tomographic models.
    Salvadó M; López M; Morant JJ; Calzado A
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):364-8. PubMed ID: 15933138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. How to Appropriately Calculate Effective Dose for CT Using Either Size-Specific Dose Estimates or Dose-Length Product.
    Brady SL; Mirro AE; Moore BM; Kaufman RA
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2015 May; 204(5):953-8. PubMed ID: 25729893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Effective dose evaluation for chest and abdomen X-ray tests.
    Lee SC; Wang JN; Liu SC; Jiang SH
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 116(1-4 Pt 2):613-9. PubMed ID: 16604711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Energy imparted-based estimates of the effect of z overscanning on adult and pediatric patient effective doses from multi-slice computed tomography.
    Theocharopoulos N; Damilakis J; Perisinakis K; Gourtsoyiannis N
    Med Phys; 2007 Apr; 34(4):1139-52. PubMed ID: 17500445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Monte Carlo calculations of electron beam quality conversion factors for several ion chamber types.
    Muir BR; Rogers DW
    Med Phys; 2014 Nov; 41(11):111701. PubMed ID: 25370615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Estimation of absorbed doses from paediatric cone-beam CT scans: MOSFET measurements and Monte Carlo simulations.
    Kim S; Yoshizumi TT; Toncheva G; Frush DP; Yin FF
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2010 Mar; 138(3):257-63. PubMed ID: 19889800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. A study of the midpoint dose to CTDI
    Li X; Yang K; Liu B
    Med Phys; 2016 Nov; 43(11):5878. PubMed ID: 27806599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Overranging in multisection CT: quantification and relative contribution to dose--comparison of four 16-section CT scanners.
    van der Molen AJ; Geleijns J
    Radiology; 2007 Jan; 242(1):208-16. PubMed ID: 17090713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Scan region and organ doses in computed tomography.
    He W; Marzolf SA; Tipnis S; Huda W
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2012 Mar; 148(4):444-51. PubMed ID: 21561946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Scattered dose to thyroid from prophylactic cranial irradiation during childhood: a Monte Carlo study.
    Mazonakis M; Tzedakis A; Damilakis J; Varveris H; Kachris S; Gourtsoyiannis N
    Phys Med Biol; 2006 Apr; 51(8):N139-45. PubMed ID: 16585835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Estimation and comparison of effective dose (E) in standard chest CT by organ dose measurements and dose-length-product methods and assessment of the influence of CT tube potential (energy dependency) on effective dose in a dual-source CT.
    Paul J; Banckwitz R; Krauss B; Vogl TJ; Maentele W; Bauer RW
    Eur J Radiol; 2012 Apr; 81(4):e507-12. PubMed ID: 21703793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Discrepancy between absorbed dose estimated from phantom measurements and from estimates using data on individual head sizes in head CT examinations.
    Adliene D; Mockeviciene S
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2010; 139(1-3):186-90. PubMed ID: 20167791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Novel methods of measuring single scan dose profiles and cumulative dose in CT.
    Nakonechny KD; Fallone BG; Rathee S
    Med Phys; 2005 Jan; 32(1):98-109. PubMed ID: 15719960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Experimental verification of lung dose with radiochromic film: comparison with Monte Carlo simulations and commercially available treatment planning systems.
    Paelinck L; Reynaert N; Thierens H; De Neve W; De Wagter C
    Phys Med Biol; 2005 May; 50(9):2055-69. PubMed ID: 15843736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Specific absorbed fractions for internal photon emitters calculated for a tomographic model of a pregnant woman.
    Shi CY; Xu XG; Stabin MG
    Health Phys; 2004 Nov; 87(5):507-11. PubMed ID: 15551788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.