These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16193790)

  • 61. Statistical analysis of dose-volume and dose-wall histograms for rectal toxicity following 3D-CRT in prostate cancer.
    García-Vicente F; Zapatero A; Floriano A; Cruz-Conde A; Perez L; Marín A; Mínguez C; Torres JJ
    Med Phys; 2005 Aug; 32(8):2503-9. PubMed ID: 16193780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. Effects of the intensity levels and beam map resolutions on static IMRT plans.
    Sun X; Xia P; Yu N
    Med Phys; 2004 Sep; 31(9):2402-11. PubMed ID: 15487719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. Maximizing the potential of direct aperture optimization through collimator rotation.
    Milette MP; Otto K
    Med Phys; 2007 Apr; 34(4):1431-8. PubMed ID: 17500474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. Optimization of radiobiological effects in intensity modulated proton therapy.
    Wilkens JJ; Oelfke U
    Med Phys; 2005 Feb; 32(2):455-65. PubMed ID: 15789592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. A new method of incorporating systematic uncertainties in intensity-modulated radiotherapy optimization.
    Yang J; Mageras GS; Spirou SV; Jackson A; Yorke E; Ling CC; Chui CS
    Med Phys; 2005 Aug; 32(8):2567-79. PubMed ID: 16193787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. A comparative study of rectal dose histograms in prostate brachytherapy: some analytic and numerical results.
    Song JS; Albert M; D'Amico AV; Cormack RA
    Med Phys; 2005 Feb; 32(2):437-47. PubMed ID: 15789590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. From physical dose constraints to equivalent uniform dose constraints in inverse radiotherapy planning.
    Thieke C; Bortfeld T; Niemierko A; Nill S
    Med Phys; 2003 Sep; 30(9):2332-9. PubMed ID: 14528955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. Improving dose homogeneity in large breasts by IMRT: efficacy and dosimetric accuracy of different techniques.
    Abo-Madyan Y; Polednik M; Rahn A; Schneider F; Dobler B; Wenz F; Lohr F
    Strahlenther Onkol; 2008 Feb; 184(2):86-92. PubMed ID: 18259700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. A finite size pencil beam for IMRT dose optimization.
    Jeleń U; Söhn M; Alber M
    Phys Med Biol; 2005 Apr; 50(8):1747-66. PubMed ID: 15815094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. Comparison of linac based fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy and tomotherapy treatment plans for skull-base tumors.
    Soisson ET; Tomé WA; Richards GM; Mehta MP
    Radiother Oncol; 2006 Mar; 78(3):313-21. PubMed ID: 16490269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. A difference-matrix metaheuristic for intensity map segmentation in step-and-shoot IMRT delivery.
    Gunawardena AD; D'Souza WD; Goadrich LD; Meyer RR; Sorensen KJ; Naqvi SA; Shi L
    Phys Med Biol; 2006 May; 51(10):2517-36. PubMed ID: 16675867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. A new algorithm for determining collimator angles that favor efficiency in MLC based IMRT delivery.
    Wang D; Hill RW; Lam S
    Med Phys; 2004 May; 31(5):1249-53. PubMed ID: 15191316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. A dose delivery verification method for conventional and intensity-modulated radiation therapy using measured field fluence distributions.
    Renner WD; Sarfaraz M; Earl MA; Yu CX
    Med Phys; 2003 Nov; 30(11):2996-3005. PubMed ID: 14655947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. Technical note: a deformable phantom for dynamic modeling in radiation therapy.
    Kashani R; Lam K; Litzenberg D; Balter J
    Med Phys; 2007 Jan; 34(1):199-201. PubMed ID: 17278505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. Interpretation of the dosimetric results of three uniformity regularization methods in terms of expected treatment outcome.
    Mavroidis P; Komisopoulos G; Lind BK; Papanikolaou N
    Med Phys; 2008 Nov; 35(11):5009-18. PubMed ID: 19070235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. Inverse treatment planning with adaptively evolving voxel-dependent penalty scheme.
    Yang Y; Xing L
    Med Phys; 2004 Oct; 31(10):2839-44. PubMed ID: 15543792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. Use of proximal operator graph solver for radiation therapy inverse treatment planning.
    Liu X; Pelizzari C; Belcher AH; Grelewicz Z; Wiersma RD
    Med Phys; 2017 Apr; 44(4):1246-1256. PubMed ID: 28211070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. Evaluation of Fifteen Algorithms for the Resolution of the Electrocardiography Imaging Inverse Problem Using
    Karoui A; Bear L; Migerditichan P; Zemzemi N
    Front Physiol; 2018; 9():1708. PubMed ID: 30555347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. [Intensity modulation by inverse planning: preliminary results].
    Vieillevigne L; Berre F; Lefkopoulos D; Grandjean P; Kafrouni H; Diaz JC; Foulquier JN; Keraudy K; Julia F
    Cancer Radiother; 1999; 3(4):325-32. PubMed ID: 10486544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80. Estimation theory and model parameter selection for therapeutic treatment plan optimization.
    Xing L; Li JG; Pugachev A; Le QT; Boyer AL
    Med Phys; 1999 Nov; 26(11):2348-58. PubMed ID: 10587216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.