These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

181 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16193800)

  • 1. Evaluation of edge effect due to phase contrast imaging for mammography.
    Matsuo S; Katafuchi T; Tohyama K; Morishita J; Yamada K; Fujita H
    Med Phys; 2005 Aug; 32(8):2690-7. PubMed ID: 16193800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Advantages of magnification in digital phase-contrast mammography using a practical X-ray tube.
    Honda C; Ohara H
    Eur J Radiol; 2008 Dec; 68(3 Suppl):S69-72. PubMed ID: 18584984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Low dose high energy x-ray in-line phase sensitive imaging prototype: Investigation of optimal geometric conditions and design parameters.
    Ghani MU; Yan A; Wong MD; Li Y; Ren L; Wu X; Liu H
    J Xray Sci Technol; 2015; 23(6):667-82. PubMed ID: 26756405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [X-ray phase imaging using a X-ray tube with a small focal spot -improvement of image quality in mammography-].
    Honda C; Ohara H; Ishisaka A; Shimada F; Endo T
    Igaku Butsuri; 2002; 22(1):21-9. PubMed ID: 12766293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Towards the clinical application of X-ray phase contrast imaging.
    Williams IM; Siu KK; Gan R; He X; Hart SA; Styles CB; Lewis RA
    Eur J Radiol; 2008 Dec; 68(3 Suppl):S73-7. PubMed ID: 18996661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Quantification of the effect of system and object parameters on edge enhancement in phase-contrast radiography.
    Donnelly EF; Price RR; Pickens DR
    Med Phys; 2003 Nov; 30(11):2888-96. PubMed ID: 14655935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Adaptation of a clustered lumpy background model for task-based image quality assessment in x-ray phase-contrast mammography.
    Zysk AM; Brankov JG; Wernick MN; Anastasio MA
    Med Phys; 2012 Feb; 39(2):906-11. PubMed ID: 22320800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Diffraction-enhanced imaging microradiography applied in breast samples.
    Rocha HS; Pereira GR; Faria P; Kellermann G; Mazzaro I; Tirao G; Giles C; Lopes RT
    Eur J Radiol; 2008 Dec; 68(3 Suppl):S37-40. PubMed ID: 18606520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. X-ray phase-attenuation duality and phase retrieval.
    Wu X; Liu H; Yan A
    Opt Lett; 2005 Feb; 30(4):379-81. PubMed ID: 15762434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. X-ray phase radiography and tomography of soft tissue using grating interferometry.
    Weitkamp T; David C; Bunk O; Bruder J; Cloetens P; Pfeiffer F
    Eur J Radiol; 2008 Dec; 68(3 Suppl):S13-7. PubMed ID: 18586429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Microcalcification detection using cone-beam CT mammography with a flat-panel imager.
    Gong X; Vedula AA; Glick SJ
    Phys Med Biol; 2004 Jun; 49(11):2183-95. PubMed ID: 15248571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A minimum spanning forest based classification method for dedicated breast CT images.
    Pike R; Sechopoulos I; Fei B
    Med Phys; 2015 Nov; 42(11):6190-202. PubMed ID: 26520712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Validation of MTF measurement for digital mammography quality control.
    Carton AK; Vandenbroucke D; Struye L; Maidment AD; Kao YH; Albert M; Bosmans H; Marchal G
    Med Phys; 2005 Jun; 32(6):1684-95. PubMed ID: 16013727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Phase-contrast X-ray tomography: contrast mechanism and roles of phase retrieval.
    Wu X; Liu H; Yan A
    Eur J Radiol; 2008 Dec; 68(3 Suppl):S8-12. PubMed ID: 18585881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A study on mastectomy samples to evaluate breast imaging quality and potential clinical relevance of differential phase contrast mammography.
    Hauser N; Wang Z; Kubik-Huch RA; Trippel M; Singer G; Hohl MK; Roessl E; Köhler T; van Stevendaal U; Wieberneit N; Stampanoni M
    Invest Radiol; 2014 Mar; 49(3):131-7. PubMed ID: 24141742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Analyser-based mammography using single-image reconstruction.
    Briedis D; Siu KK; Paganin DM; Pavlov KM; Lewis RA
    Phys Med Biol; 2005 Aug; 50(15):3599-611. PubMed ID: 16030385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Simultaneous acquisition of dual analyser-based phase contrast X-ray images for small animal imaging.
    Kitchen MJ; Pavlov KM; Hooper SB; Vine DJ; Siu KK; Wallace MJ; Siew ML; Yagi N; Uesugi K; Lewis RA
    Eur J Radiol; 2008 Dec; 68(3 Suppl):S49-53. PubMed ID: 18599236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Wavelet-based noise-model driven denoising algorithm for differential phase contrast mammography.
    Arboleda C; Wang Z; Stampanoni M
    Opt Express; 2013 May; 21(9):10572-89. PubMed ID: 23669913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Dual focal-spot imaging for phase extraction in phase-contrast radiography.
    Donnelly EF; Price RR; Pickens DR
    Med Phys; 2003 Sep; 30(9):2292-6. PubMed ID: 14528949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A comparison of reconstruction algorithms for C-arm mammography tomosynthesis.
    Rakowski JT; Dennis MJ
    Med Phys; 2006 Aug; 33(8):3018-32. PubMed ID: 16964880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.