BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

186 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16193800)

  • 1. Evaluation of edge effect due to phase contrast imaging for mammography.
    Matsuo S; Katafuchi T; Tohyama K; Morishita J; Yamada K; Fujita H
    Med Phys; 2005 Aug; 32(8):2690-7. PubMed ID: 16193800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Advantages of magnification in digital phase-contrast mammography using a practical X-ray tube.
    Honda C; Ohara H
    Eur J Radiol; 2008 Dec; 68(3 Suppl):S69-72. PubMed ID: 18584984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Low dose high energy x-ray in-line phase sensitive imaging prototype: Investigation of optimal geometric conditions and design parameters.
    Ghani MU; Yan A; Wong MD; Li Y; Ren L; Wu X; Liu H
    J Xray Sci Technol; 2015; 23(6):667-82. PubMed ID: 26756405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [X-ray phase imaging using a X-ray tube with a small focal spot -improvement of image quality in mammography-].
    Honda C; Ohara H; Ishisaka A; Shimada F; Endo T
    Igaku Butsuri; 2002; 22(1):21-9. PubMed ID: 12766293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Towards the clinical application of X-ray phase contrast imaging.
    Williams IM; Siu KK; Gan R; He X; Hart SA; Styles CB; Lewis RA
    Eur J Radiol; 2008 Dec; 68(3 Suppl):S73-7. PubMed ID: 18996661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Quantification of the effect of system and object parameters on edge enhancement in phase-contrast radiography.
    Donnelly EF; Price RR; Pickens DR
    Med Phys; 2003 Nov; 30(11):2888-96. PubMed ID: 14655935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Adaptation of a clustered lumpy background model for task-based image quality assessment in x-ray phase-contrast mammography.
    Zysk AM; Brankov JG; Wernick MN; Anastasio MA
    Med Phys; 2012 Feb; 39(2):906-11. PubMed ID: 22320800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Diffraction-enhanced imaging microradiography applied in breast samples.
    Rocha HS; Pereira GR; Faria P; Kellermann G; Mazzaro I; Tirao G; Giles C; Lopes RT
    Eur J Radiol; 2008 Dec; 68(3 Suppl):S37-40. PubMed ID: 18606520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. X-ray phase-attenuation duality and phase retrieval.
    Wu X; Liu H; Yan A
    Opt Lett; 2005 Feb; 30(4):379-81. PubMed ID: 15762434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. X-ray phase radiography and tomography of soft tissue using grating interferometry.
    Weitkamp T; David C; Bunk O; Bruder J; Cloetens P; Pfeiffer F
    Eur J Radiol; 2008 Dec; 68(3 Suppl):S13-7. PubMed ID: 18586429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Microcalcification detection using cone-beam CT mammography with a flat-panel imager.
    Gong X; Vedula AA; Glick SJ
    Phys Med Biol; 2004 Jun; 49(11):2183-95. PubMed ID: 15248571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A minimum spanning forest based classification method for dedicated breast CT images.
    Pike R; Sechopoulos I; Fei B
    Med Phys; 2015 Nov; 42(11):6190-202. PubMed ID: 26520712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Validation of MTF measurement for digital mammography quality control.
    Carton AK; Vandenbroucke D; Struye L; Maidment AD; Kao YH; Albert M; Bosmans H; Marchal G
    Med Phys; 2005 Jun; 32(6):1684-95. PubMed ID: 16013727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Phase-contrast X-ray tomography: contrast mechanism and roles of phase retrieval.
    Wu X; Liu H; Yan A
    Eur J Radiol; 2008 Dec; 68(3 Suppl):S8-12. PubMed ID: 18585881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A study on mastectomy samples to evaluate breast imaging quality and potential clinical relevance of differential phase contrast mammography.
    Hauser N; Wang Z; Kubik-Huch RA; Trippel M; Singer G; Hohl MK; Roessl E; Köhler T; van Stevendaal U; Wieberneit N; Stampanoni M
    Invest Radiol; 2014 Mar; 49(3):131-7. PubMed ID: 24141742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Analyser-based mammography using single-image reconstruction.
    Briedis D; Siu KK; Paganin DM; Pavlov KM; Lewis RA
    Phys Med Biol; 2005 Aug; 50(15):3599-611. PubMed ID: 16030385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Simultaneous acquisition of dual analyser-based phase contrast X-ray images for small animal imaging.
    Kitchen MJ; Pavlov KM; Hooper SB; Vine DJ; Siu KK; Wallace MJ; Siew ML; Yagi N; Uesugi K; Lewis RA
    Eur J Radiol; 2008 Dec; 68(3 Suppl):S49-53. PubMed ID: 18599236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Wavelet-based noise-model driven denoising algorithm for differential phase contrast mammography.
    Arboleda C; Wang Z; Stampanoni M
    Opt Express; 2013 May; 21(9):10572-89. PubMed ID: 23669913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Dual focal-spot imaging for phase extraction in phase-contrast radiography.
    Donnelly EF; Price RR; Pickens DR
    Med Phys; 2003 Sep; 30(9):2292-6. PubMed ID: 14528949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A comparison of reconstruction algorithms for C-arm mammography tomosynthesis.
    Rakowski JT; Dennis MJ
    Med Phys; 2006 Aug; 33(8):3018-32. PubMed ID: 16964880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.