These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16194938)

  • 1. Representing response position relative to display location: influence on orthogonal stimulus-response compatibility.
    Cho YS; Proctor RW
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2005 Jul; 58(5):839-64. PubMed ID: 16194938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Orthogonal stimulus-response compatibility effects emerge even when the stimulus position is task irrelevant.
    Nishimura A; Yokosawa K
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2006 Jun; 59(6):1021-32. PubMed ID: 16885141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effects of response eccentricity and relative position on orthogonal stimulus-response compatibility with joystick and keypress responses.
    Proctor RW; Cho YS
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2003 Feb; 56(2):309-27. PubMed ID: 12613566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Transfer of orthogonal stimulus-response mappings to an orthogonal Simon task.
    Bae GY; Cho YS; Proctor RW
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2009 Apr; 62(4):746-65. PubMed ID: 18780263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Influences of multiple spatial stimulus and response codes on orthogonal stimulus-response compatibility.
    Cho YS; Proctor RW
    Percept Psychophys; 2004 Aug; 66(6):1003-17. PubMed ID: 15675647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Stimulus-set location does not affect orthogonal stimulus-response compatibility.
    Cho YS; Proctor RW
    Psychol Res; 2004 Dec; 69(1-2):106-14. PubMed ID: 14634811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Stimulus-response compatibility for mixed mappings and tasks with unique responses.
    Proctor RW; Vu KP
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2010 Feb; 63(2):320-40. PubMed ID: 19526436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effects of visual cue and response assignment on spatial stimulus coding in stimulus-response compatibility.
    Nishimura A; Yokosawa K
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2012; 65(1):55-72. PubMed ID: 21939367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Transfer of noncorresponding spatial associations to the auditory Simon task.
    Proctor RW; Yamaguchi M; Vu KP
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2007 Jan; 33(1):245-53. PubMed ID: 17201566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Influences of hand posture and hand position on compatibility effects for up-down stimuli mapped to left-right responses: evidence for a hand referent hypothesis.
    Cho YS; Proctor RW
    Percept Psychophys; 2002 Nov; 64(8):1301-15. PubMed ID: 12519027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Stimulus-response compatibility for absolute and relative spatial correspondence in reaching and in button pressing.
    Stins JF; Michaels CF
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2000 May; 53(2):569-89. PubMed ID: 10881619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Is direction position? Position- and direction-based correspondence effects in tasks with moving stimuli.
    Bosbach S; Prinz W; Kerzel D
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2005 Apr; 58(3):467-506. PubMed ID: 16025758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Stimulus and response representations underlying orthogonal stimulus-response compatibility effects.
    Cho YS; Proctor RW
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2003 Mar; 10(1):45-73. PubMed ID: 12747491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Influence of operator orientation on relative organizational mapping and spatial compatibility.
    Chua R; Weeks DJ; Ricker KL; Poon P
    Ergonomics; 2001 Jun; 44(8):751-65. PubMed ID: 11450874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Hierarchical knowledge influences stimulus-response compatibility effects.
    Tlauka M; McKenna FP
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2000 Feb; 53(1):85-103. PubMed ID: 10718065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Coding specificity of orthogonal S-R compatibility].
    Kleinsorge T
    Z Exp Psychol; 1999; 46(4):249-64. PubMed ID: 10551040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The role of instructions, practice, and stimulus-hand correspondence on the Simon effect.
    Roswarski TE; Proctor RW
    Psychol Res; 2003 Feb; 67(1):43-55. PubMed ID: 12589449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Influences of response position and hand posture on the orthogonal Simon effect.
    Cho YS; Proctor RW; Yamaguchi M
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2008 Jul; 61(7):1020-35. PubMed ID: 18938283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Influences of different combinations of conceptual, perceptual, and structural similarity on stimulus-response compatibility.
    Proctor RW; Wang H; Vu KP
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2002 Jan; 55(1):59-74. PubMed ID: 11873856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Some considerations of two alleged kinds of selective attention.
    Keren G
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 1976 Dec; 105(4):349-74. PubMed ID: 1003122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.