These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
103 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16194945)
21. Effects of wording and stimulus format on the use of contingency information in causal judgment. White PA Mem Cognit; 2003 Mar; 31(2):231-42. PubMed ID: 12749465 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Aging and the detection of contingency in causal learning. Mutter SA; Williams TW Psychol Aging; 2004 Mar; 19(1):13-26. PubMed ID: 15065928 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Judgments of causal efficacy under constant and changing interevent contingencies. Katagiri M; Kao SF; Simon AM; Castro L; Wasserman EA Behav Processes; 2007 Feb; 74(2):251-64. PubMed ID: 17029817 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. The sad truth about depressive realism. Allan LG; Siegel S; Hannah S Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2007 Mar; 60(3):482-95. PubMed ID: 17366313 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Information integration in judgements of time to contact. DeLucia P; Kaiser M; Bush J; Meyer L; Sweet B Q J Exp Psychol A; 2003 Oct; 56(7):1165-89. PubMed ID: 12959909 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Interaction between previous beliefs and cue predictive value in covariation-based causal induction. Catena A; Maldonado A; Perales JC; Cándido A Acta Psychol (Amst); 2008 Jun; 128(2):339-49. PubMed ID: 18445489 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Spatial separation of target and competitor cues enhances blocking of human causality judgements. Glautier S Q J Exp Psychol B; 2002 Apr; 55(2):121-35. PubMed ID: 12075979 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Does the type of judgement required modulate cue competition? Cobos PL; Caño A; López FJ; Luque JL; Almaraz J Q J Exp Psychol B; 2000 Aug; 53(3):193-207. PubMed ID: 11006718 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Outcome and cue properties modulate blocking. De Houwer J; Beckers T; Glautier S Q J Exp Psychol A; 2002 Jul; 55(3):965-85. PubMed ID: 12188522 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Causal judgements about temporal sequences of events in single individuals. White PA Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2015; 68(11):2149-74. PubMed ID: 25728947 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Adult age differences in on-line contingency judgements. Parr WV; Mercier P Can J Exp Psychol; 1998 Sep; 52(3):147-59. PubMed ID: 9849098 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Metacomprehension judgements reflect the belief that diagrams improve learning from text. Serra MJ; Dunlosky J Memory; 2010 Oct; 18(7):698-711. PubMed ID: 20730677 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. The effects of assessment type on verbal ratings of conditional stimulus valence and contingency judgments: implications for the extinction of evaluative learning. Lipp OV; Purkis HM J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2006 Oct; 32(4):431-40. PubMed ID: 17044745 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Driven by power? Probe question and presentation format effects on causal judgment. Perales JC; Shanks DR J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 Nov; 34(6):1482-94. PubMed ID: 18980409 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Does binocular disparity or familiar size information override effects of relative size on judgements of time to contact? DeLucia PR Q J Exp Psychol A; 2005 Jul; 58(5):865-86. PubMed ID: 16194939 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Making causal judgments from the proportion of confirming instances: the pCI rule. White PA J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2003 Jul; 29(4):710-27. PubMed ID: 12924869 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]