These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16194992)

  • 1. Should reviewers' names be included at the end of journal papers?
    Stensel D
    J Sports Sci; 2005 May; 23(5):447. PubMed ID: 16194992
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Guide for peer reviewers of scientific article].
    Marusić M; Sambunjak D; Marusić A
    Lijec Vjesn; 2005; 127(5-6):107-11. PubMed ID: 16281469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Who is afraid of reviewers' comments? Or, why anything can be published and anything can be cited.
    Ioannidis JP; Tatsioni A; Karassa FB
    Eur J Clin Invest; 2010 Apr; 40(4):285-7. PubMed ID: 20486989
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Innovation, journal reviewers, and journal editors the game is worth the candle.
    Popp RL
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2005 Oct; 46(7):1360-1. PubMed ID: 16198856
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Guide for peer reviewers of scientific articles in the Croatian Medical Journal.
    Marusić M; Sambunjak D; Marusić A
    Croat Med J; 2005 Apr; 46(2):326-32. PubMed ID: 15849858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Blinding in peer review: the preferences of reviewers for nursing journals.
    Baggs JG; Broome ME; Dougherty MC; Freda MC; Kearney MH
    J Adv Nurs; 2008 Oct; 64(2):131-8. PubMed ID: 18764847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Bad peer reviewers.
    Nature; 2001 Sep; 413(6852):93. PubMed ID: 11557930
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The do's and don't's of submitting scientific papers.
    Walsh PJ; Mommsen TP; Nilsson GE
    Comp Biochem Physiol B Biochem Mol Biol; 2009 Mar; 152(3):203-4. PubMed ID: 19146976
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Student peer review decisions on submitted manuscripts are as stringent as faculty peer reviewers.
    Navalta JW; Lyons TS
    Adv Physiol Educ; 2010 Dec; 34(4):170-3. PubMed ID: 21098383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. ArrayExpress service for reviewers/editors of DNA microarray papers.
    Brazma A; Parkinson H;
    Nat Biotechnol; 2006 Nov; 24(11):1321-2. PubMed ID: 17093465
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Standards for papers on cloning.
    Nature; 2006 Jan; 439(7074):243. PubMed ID: 16421524
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Publishing in a peer-reviewed journal.
    Downer M
    Community Dent Health; 2003 Mar; 20(1):1-4. PubMed ID: 12688596
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Reviewers' perceptions of the peer review process for a medical education journal.
    Snell L; Spencer J
    Med Educ; 2005 Jan; 39(1):90-7. PubMed ID: 15612905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The use and misuse of journal metrics and other citation indicators.
    Pendlebury DA
    Arch Immunol Ther Exp (Warsz); 2009; 57(1):1-11. PubMed ID: 19219526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Integrity of the peer review process.
    Smith ER
    Can J Cardiol; 2000 Jun; 16(6):814. PubMed ID: 10863172
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. AJR reviewers: We need to continue to improve our education and monitoring methods!
    Berquist TH
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2013 Jun; 200(6):1179-80. PubMed ID: 23701050
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Paranoid about peer review?
    Rumjanek FD
    Nature; 1996 Dec; 384(6609):509. PubMed ID: 8955262
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Ensuring the quality of peer-review process.
    Afifi M
    Saudi Med J; 2006 Aug; 27(8):1253. PubMed ID: 16883466
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Peer review: "a critique of the critics".
    Andersson KE
    J Urol; 2011 Sep; 186(3):777-8. PubMed ID: 21788036
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Citations, impact factors and shady publication practices: how should the lasting clinical and social value of research really be measured?
    O'Connor SJ
    Eur J Cancer Care (Engl); 2010 Mar; 19(2):141-3. PubMed ID: 20486987
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.