These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16194992)
21. Upon Further Review: Peer Process Vital to Publishing. Katz A Oncol Nurs Forum; 2016 Nov; 43(6):675-676. PubMed ID: 27768133 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Responsibilities of our journal editors and reviewers. Zandi I Plast Reconstr Surg; 2004 Jun; 113(7):2238. PubMed ID: 15253240 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Role of the manuscript reviewer. Peh WC; Ng KH Singapore Med J; 2009 Oct; 50(10):931-3; quiz 934. PubMed ID: 19907880 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Journals: how to decide what's worth publishing. Jefferson T; Shashok K Nature; 2003 Jan; 421(6920):209-10. PubMed ID: 12529609 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Your paper has been accepted for publication. Munk-Jørgensen P; Christiansen B; Licht RW Acta Psychiatr Scand; 2010 Jan; 121(1):1-3. PubMed ID: 20059451 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Reply to "responsibilities of our journal editors and reviewers". Tebbetts JB Plast Reconstr Surg; 2004 Sep; 114(3):832-3. PubMed ID: 15318090 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Journals submit to scrutiny of their peer-review process. Giles J Nature; 2006 Jan; 439(7074):252. PubMed ID: 16421533 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Readers' and author's responses to "are traditional peer-reviewed medical articles obsolete?". Goldstone RA MedGenMed; 2006; 8(1):70; author reply 70. PubMed ID: 16967523 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. The matter of standards. III. The editorial process. Wilkins AS Bioessays; 2008 Nov; 30(11-12):1037-9. PubMed ID: 18937297 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Are reviewers suggested by authors as good as those chosen by editors? Results of a rater-blinded, retrospective study. Wager E; Parkin EC; Tamber PS BMC Med; 2006 May; 4():13. PubMed ID: 16734897 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Next steps in the Schön affair. Kennedy D Science; 2002 Oct; 298(5593):495. PubMed ID: 12386303 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Too close to call. Curfman GD; Drazen JM N Engl J Med; 2001 Sep; 345(11):832. PubMed ID: 11556307 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. A comparison of reports from referees chosen by authors or journal editors in the peer review process. Earnshaw JJ; Farndon JR; Guillou PJ; Johnson CD; Murie JA; Murray GD Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 2000 Apr; 82(4 Suppl):133-5. PubMed ID: 10889776 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Beyond the language barrier. Umakantha N Nature; 1997 Feb; 385(6619):764. PubMed ID: 9039902 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]