These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

94 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1619600)

  • 1. Cervex-Brush and Cytobrush: comparison of their ability to sample abnormal cells for cervical smears.
    Pfenninger JL
    J Reprod Med; 1992 Jun; 37(6):A32. PubMed ID: 1619600
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Improving the Cytobrush as an aid in the evaluation of the abnormal Papanicolaou test.
    Gosewehr JA; Julian TM; O'Connell BJ
    Obstet Gynecol; 1991 Sep; 78(3 Pt 1):440-3. PubMed ID: 1876381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Cervix cytology: Cervex Brush versus conventional cotton swab].
    Altermatt HJ; Wyler K; Fravi R; Liu X; Kraft R; Dreher E
    Praxis (Bern 1994); 1997 Jun; 86(24):1029-33. PubMed ID: 9312820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cervex-Brush and Cytobrush. Comparison of their ability to sample abnormal cells for cervical smears.
    Hutchinson M; Fertitta L; Goldbaum B; Hamza M; Vanerian S; Isenstein L
    J Reprod Med; 1991 Aug; 36(8):581-6. PubMed ID: 1941800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Cervical smears following laser treatment. Comparison of Cervex brush versus Cytobrush-Ayre spatula sampling.
    Szarewski A; Cuzick J; Singer A
    Acta Cytol; 1991; 35(1):76-8. PubMed ID: 1994639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of four cytologic sampling techniques in a large family planning center.
    Szarewski A; Curran G; Edwards R; Cuzick J; Kocjan G; Bounds W; Guillebaud J
    Acta Cytol; 1993; 37(4):457-60. PubMed ID: 8328239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of cytobrush and cotton swab for Papanicolaou smears in pregnancy.
    Rivlin ME; Woodliff JM; Bowlin RB; Moore JL; Martin RW; Grossman JH; Morrison JC
    J Reprod Med; 1993 Feb; 38(2):147-50. PubMed ID: 8445608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Use effectiveness of the Cytobrush in the primary care setting.
    Cauthen DB; Cullison M; Symm B; Peterson RF
    J Am Board Fam Pract; 1992; 5(4):365-8. PubMed ID: 1496891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of the Cytobrush plus plastic spatula with the Cervex Brush for obtaining endocervical cells.
    Cannon JM; Blythe JG
    Obstet Gynecol; 1993 Oct; 82(4 Pt 1):569-72. PubMed ID: 8377984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A comparison of the three most common Papanicolaou smear collection techniques.
    Germain M; Heaton R; Erickson D; Henry M; Nash J; O'Connor D
    Obstet Gynecol; 1994 Aug; 84(2):168-73. PubMed ID: 8041524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluation of the endocervical Cytobrush and Cervex-Brush in pregnant women.
    Paraiso MF; Brady K; Helmchen R; Roat TW
    Obstet Gynecol; 1994 Oct; 84(4):539-43. PubMed ID: 8090390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of the Cervex-Brush alone to Cytobrush plus Cervex-Brush for detection of cervical dysplasia in women with a transformation zone type 3.
    Manley KM; Wills AK; Villeneuve N; Hunt K; Patel A; Glew S
    Cytopathology; 2019 Mar; 30(2):157-163. PubMed ID: 30414286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The cytobrush for evaluating routine cervicovaginal-endocervical smears.
    Lai-Goldman M; Nieberg RK; Mulcahy D; Wiesmeier E
    J Reprod Med; 1990 Oct; 35(10):959-63. PubMed ID: 2246763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Cervex brush versus vaginal-cervical-endocervical (VCE) triple smear techniques in cervical sampling.
    Järvi K
    Cytopathology; 1997 Aug; 8(4):282-8. PubMed ID: 9252746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Cervex-Brush vs. spatula and Cytobrush. A cytohistologic evaluation.
    Risberg B; Andersson A; Zetterberg C; Nordin B
    J Reprod Med; 1997 Jul; 42(7):405-8. PubMed ID: 9252930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of Cytobrush sampling, spatula sampling and combined Cytobrush-spatula sampling of the uterine cervix.
    Buntinx F; Boon ME; Beck S; Knottnerus JA; Essed GG
    Acta Cytol; 1991; 35(1):64-8. PubMed ID: 1994637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A trial of two methods of taking cervical smears: the Aylesbury spatula plus cytology brush compared to the Cervex broom.
    Sparrow MJ; Fauck R; Gupta RK
    N Z Med J; 1997 Sep; 110(1052):356-8. PubMed ID: 9364178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparing the yield of the standard Papanicolaou and endocervical brush smears.
    Hoffman MS; Hill DA; Gordy LW; Lane J; Cavanagh D
    J Reprod Med; 1991 Apr; 36(4):267-9. PubMed ID: 1649306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A trap for atypical cells.
    Rubio CA
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1977 Jul; 128(6):687-8. PubMed ID: 327812
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A randomized trial of three methods of obtaining Papanicolaou smears.
    Pretorius RG; Sadeghi M; Fotheringham N; Semrad N; Watring WG
    Obstet Gynecol; 1991 Nov; 78(5 Pt 1):831-6. PubMed ID: 1923208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.