These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16196080)

  • 1. Bias resulting from the use of 'assay sensitivity' as an inclusion criterion for meta-analysis.
    Gelfand LA; Strunk DR; Tu XM; Noble RE; Derubeis RJ
    Stat Med; 2006 Mar; 25(6):943-55. PubMed ID: 16196080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Hypothesis tests for population heterogeneity in meta-analysis.
    Viechtbauer W
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2007 May; 60(Pt 1):29-60. PubMed ID: 17535578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Empirical evaluation showed that the Copas selection model provided a useful summary in 80% of meta-analyses.
    Carpenter JR; Schwarzer G; Rücker G; Künstler R
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2009 Jun; 62(6):624-631.e4. PubMed ID: 19282148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Critical reading of the meta-analysis of clinical trials.
    Nony P; Cucherat M; Haugh MC; Boissel JP
    Therapie; 1995; 50(4):339-51. PubMed ID: 7482388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Beyond classical meta-analysis: can inadequately reported studies be included?
    Robertson C; Idris NR; Boyle P
    Drug Discov Today; 2004 Nov; 9(21):924-31. PubMed ID: 15501727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Selective reporting of adjusted estimates in observational epidemiology studies: reasons and implications for meta-analyses.
    Peters J; Mengersen K
    Eval Health Prof; 2008 Dec; 31(4):370-89. PubMed ID: 19000980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Performance of the trim and fill method in the presence of publication bias and between-study heterogeneity.
    Peters JL; Sutton AJ; Jones DR; Abrams KR; Rushton L
    Stat Med; 2007 Nov; 26(25):4544-62. PubMed ID: 17476644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Publication bias was not a good reason to discourage trials with low power.
    Borm GF; den Heijer M; Zielhuis GA
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2009 Jan; 62(1):47.e1-10. PubMed ID: 18620841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Estimating the proportion of studies missing for meta-analysis due to publication bias.
    Formann AK
    Contemp Clin Trials; 2008 Sep; 29(5):732-9. PubMed ID: 18586577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management: part 6. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of observational studies.
    Manchikanti L; Datta S; Smith HS; Hirsch JA
    Pain Physician; 2009; 12(5):819-50. PubMed ID: 19787009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Bias of estimates of the number needed to treat.
    Duncan BW; Olkin I
    Stat Med; 2005 Jun; 24(12):1837-48. PubMed ID: 15806616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluation of underlying risk as a source of heterogeneity in meta-analyses: a simulation study of Bayesian and frequentist implementations of three models.
    Dohoo I; Stryhn H; Sanchez J
    Prev Vet Med; 2007 Sep; 81(1-3):38-55. PubMed ID: 17477995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Should meta-analyses of interventions include observational studies in addition to randomized controlled trials? A critical examination of underlying principles.
    Shrier I; Boivin JF; Steele RJ; Platt RW; Furlan A; Kakuma R; Brophy J; Rossignol M
    Am J Epidemiol; 2007 Nov; 166(10):1203-9. PubMed ID: 17712019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Using dissertations to examine potential bias in child and adolescent clinical trials.
    McLeod BD; Weisz JR
    J Consult Clin Psychol; 2004 Apr; 72(2):235-51. PubMed ID: 15065958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Fixed- versus random-effects models in meta-analysis: model properties and an empirical comparison of differences in results.
    Schmidt FL; Oh IS; Hayes TL
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2009 Feb; 62(Pt 1):97-128. PubMed ID: 18001516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The power of statistical tests in meta-analysis.
    Hedges LV; Pigott TD
    Psychol Methods; 2001 Sep; 6(3):203-17. PubMed ID: 11570228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Meta-analysis of repeated measures study designs.
    Peters JL; Mengersen KL
    J Eval Clin Pract; 2008 Oct; 14(5):941-50. PubMed ID: 19018929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. How meta-analysis increases statistical power.
    Cohn LD; Becker BJ
    Psychol Methods; 2003 Sep; 8(3):243-53. PubMed ID: 14596489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Statistical and clinical significance: alternative methods for understanding the importance of research findings.
    Glaros AG
    J Ir Dent Assoc; 2004; 50(3):128-31. PubMed ID: 15481525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Impact of allocation concealment on conclusions drawn from meta-analyses of randomized trials.
    Pildal J; Hróbjartsson A; Jørgensen KJ; Hilden J; Altman DG; Gøtzsche PC
    Int J Epidemiol; 2007 Aug; 36(4):847-57. PubMed ID: 17517809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.