These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
255 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1619625)
21. Four approaches to doing ethics. Levi BH J Med Philos; 1996 Feb; 21(1):7-39. PubMed ID: 8740882 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Practice verus theory. Jonsen AR Hastings Cent Rep; 1990; 20(4):32-4. PubMed ID: 11655997 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Casuistry: an alternative or complement to principles? Jonsen AR Kennedy Inst Ethics J; 1995 Sep; 5(3):237-51. PubMed ID: 11645308 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Amenable to reason: Aristotle's rhetoric and the moral psychology of practical ethics. London AJ Kennedy Inst Ethics J; 2000 Dec; 10(4):287-305. PubMed ID: 11699543 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Principles and particularity: the roles of cases in bioethics. Arras JD Indiana Law J; 1994; 69(4):983-1014. PubMed ID: 11653167 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. A memo from the central office: the "Ethical and Religious Directives for Catholic Health Care Services". Wildes KW Kennedy Inst Ethics J; 1995 Jun; 5(2):133-9. PubMed ID: 10143181 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Bioethics, expertise, and the courts: an overview and an argument for inevitability. Morreim EH J Med Philos; 1997 Aug; 22(4):291-5. PubMed ID: 9309545 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Who is entitled to double effect? Boyle J J Med Philos; 1991 Oct; 16(5):475-94; discussion 511-4. PubMed ID: 1779208 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Principles and other emerging paradigms in bioethics. Beauchamp TL Indiana Law J; 1994; 69(4):955-71. PubMed ID: 11653164 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. How medicine saved the life of ethics. Toulmin S Perspect Biol Med; 1982; 25(4):736-50. PubMed ID: 11643854 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Against medical ethics: a response to Cassell. Seedhouse D J Med Ethics; 1998 Feb; 24(1):13-7. PubMed ID: 11645072 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Bioethics as methodological case resolution: specification, specified principlism and casuistry. Iltis AS J Med Philos; 2000 Jun; 25(3):271-84. PubMed ID: 10852335 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Is there no common morality? Strong C Med Humanit Rev; 1997; 11(1):39-45. PubMed ID: 11656904 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. The power (and limits) of proximity. Koenig BA Hastings Cent Rep; 1996; 26(6):30-2. PubMed ID: 8970797 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. A meta-ethical critique of care ethics. Rudnick A Theor Med Bioeth; 2001; 22(6):505-17. PubMed ID: 11939422 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Ethical and logical analysis as human sciences. Langsdorf L Hum Stud; 1988 Jan; 11(1):43-63. PubMed ID: 11651934 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Can phronesis save the life of medical ethics? Beresford EB Theor Med; 1996 Sep; 17(3):209-24. PubMed ID: 8952418 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Ethics and imagination. Implications of cognitive semantics for medical ethics. Nordgren A Theor Med Bioeth; 1998 Apr; 19(2):117-41. PubMed ID: 9564091 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Bioethics as politics: the limits of moral expertise. Powers M Kennedy Inst Ethics J; 2005 Sep; 15(3):305-22. PubMed ID: 16250118 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]