BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

118 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16196407)

  • 1. The role of potassium, magnesium and calcium in the Enhanced Biological Phosphorus Removal treatment plants.
    Barat R; Montoya T; Seco A; Ferrer J
    Environ Technol; 2005 Sep; 26(9):983-92. PubMed ID: 16196407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The contribution of 'omic'-based approaches to the study of enhanced biological phosphorus removal microbiology.
    Forbes CM; O'Leary ND; Dobson AD; Marchesi JR
    FEMS Microbiol Ecol; 2009 Jul; 69(1):1-15. PubMed ID: 19486153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effects of potassium and magnesium in the enhanced biological phosphorus removal process using a membrane bioreactor.
    Choi HJ; Yu SW; Lee SM; Yu SY
    Water Environ Res; 2011 Jul; 83(7):613-21. PubMed ID: 21790079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effect of pH on biological phosphorus uptake.
    Serralta J; Ferrer J; Borrás L; Seco A
    Biotechnol Bioeng; 2006 Dec; 95(5):875-82. PubMed ID: 16958137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Advances in enhanced biological phosphorus removal: from micro to macro scale.
    Oehmen A; Lemos PC; Carvalho G; Yuan Z; Keller J; Blackall LL; Reis MA
    Water Res; 2007 Jun; 41(11):2271-300. PubMed ID: 17434562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Enhanced biological phosphorus removal in a semi full-scale SBBR.
    Arnz P; Arnold E; Wilderer PA
    Water Sci Technol; 2001; 43(3):167-74. PubMed ID: 11381901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effect of prefermentation on denitrifying phosphorus removal in slaughterhouse wastewater.
    Merzouki M; Bernet N; Delgenès JP; Benlemlih M
    Bioresour Technol; 2005 Aug; 96(12):1317-22. PubMed ID: 15792577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Enhanced biological phosphorus removal process implemented in membrane bioreactors to improve phosphorous recovery and recycling.
    Lesjean B; Gnirss R; Adam C; Kraume M; Luck F
    Water Sci Technol; 2003; 48(1):87-94. PubMed ID: 12926624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Effect of magnesium ion content on the biological phosphorus removal system in SBR].
    Li X; Gao DW; Liu L
    Huan Jing Ke Xue; 2011 Jul; 32(7):2036-40. PubMed ID: 21922827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Experimental assessment and modelling of the proton production linked to phosphorus release and uptake in EBPR systems.
    Marcelino M; Guisasola A; Baeza JA
    Water Res; 2009 May; 43(9):2431-40. PubMed ID: 19328517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Biochemistry of enhanced biological phosphorus removal and anaerobic COD stabilization.
    Erdal ZK; Erdal UG; Randall CW
    Water Sci Technol; 2005; 52(10-11):557-67. PubMed ID: 16459834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Performance of IFAS wastewater treatment processes for biological phosphorus removal.
    Sriwiriyarat T; Randall CW
    Water Res; 2005 Oct; 39(16):3873-84. PubMed ID: 16126245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Interactions between calcium precipitation and the polyphosphate-accumulating bacteria metabolism.
    Barat R; Montoya T; Borrás L; Ferrer J; Seco A
    Water Res; 2008 Jul; 42(13):3415-24. PubMed ID: 18538819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Simultaneous removal of phosphorus and potassium from synthetic urine through the precipitation of magnesium potassium phosphate hexahydrate.
    Xu K; Wang C; Liu H; Qian Y
    Chemosphere; 2011 Jun; 84(2):207-12. PubMed ID: 21596418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Factors affecting the microbial populations at full-scale enhanced biological phosphorus removal (EBPR) wastewater treatment plants in The Netherlands.
    López-Vázquez CM; Hooijmans CM; Brdjanovic D; Gijzen HJ; van Loosdrecht MC
    Water Res; 2008 May; 42(10-11):2349-60. PubMed ID: 18272198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. An extension of ASM2d including pH calculation.
    Serralta J; Ferrer J; Borrás L; Seco A
    Water Res; 2004 Nov; 38(19):4029-38. PubMed ID: 15491650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. An enhanced biological phosphorus removal (EBPR) control strategy for sequencing batch reactors (SBRs).
    Dassanayake CY; Irvine RL
    Water Sci Technol; 2001; 43(3):183-9. PubMed ID: 11381903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effect of pH control on EBPR stability and efficiency.
    Serafim LS; Lemos PC; Reis MA
    Water Sci Technol; 2002; 46(4-5):179-84. PubMed ID: 12361007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Requirement of Acinetobacter junii for magnesium, calcium and potassium ions.
    Hrenovic J; Ivankovic T; Rozic M
    J Biosci Bioeng; 2010 Aug; 110(2):180-6. PubMed ID: 20547327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A new interpretation of ASM2d for modeling of SBR performance for enhanced biological phosphorus removal under different P/HAc ratios.
    Yagci N; Insel G; Tasli R; Artan N; Randall CW; Orhon D
    Biotechnol Bioeng; 2006 Feb; 93(2):258-70. PubMed ID: 16261629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.