These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

113 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1619708)

  • 1. Validation of Doppler measurement of pressure gradients across peripheral model arterial stenosis.
    Weber G; Strauss AL; Rieger H; Scheffler A; Eisenhoffer J
    J Vasc Surg; 1992 Jul; 16(1):10-6. PubMed ID: 1619708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Why is the Doppler pressure gradient higher than the one measured by catheter?].
    Wéber G; Strauss AL; Horst R; Andreas S; Eisenhoffer JS
    Orv Hetil; 1992 Aug; 133(31):1953-8. PubMed ID: 1495805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Noninvasive assessment of pressure gradients across iliac artery stenoses: duplex and catheter correlative study.
    Strauss AL; Roth FJ; Rieger H
    J Ultrasound Med; 1993 Jan; 12(1):17-22. PubMed ID: 8455216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effect of stenosis geometry on the Doppler-catheter gradient relation in vitro: a manifestation of pressure recovery.
    Baumgartner H; Schima H; Tulzer G; Kühn P
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 1993 Mar; 21(4):1018-25. PubMed ID: 8450150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. "Overestimation" of catheter gradients by Doppler ultrasound in patients with aortic stenosis: a predictable manifestation of pressure recovery.
    Baumgartner H; Stefenelli T; Niederberger J; Schima H; Maurer G
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 1999 May; 33(6):1655-61. PubMed ID: 10334438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Accuracy of the simplified Bernoulli relationship in measuring pressure gradients across stenosis.
    Rieu R; Pelissier R; Isaaz K
    Int Angiol; 1989; 8(4):210-5. PubMed ID: 2699483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Sources of error in intra-arterial pressure measurements across a stenosis.
    McWilliams RG; Robertson I; Smye SW; Wijesinghe L; Kessel D
    Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg; 1998 Jun; 15(6):535-40. PubMed ID: 9659891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Doppler ultrasound determination of pressure decrease in model peripheral arterial stenoses].
    Strauss AL; Scheffler A; Rieger H
    Vasa; 1990; 19(3):207-11. PubMed ID: 2238814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. How can the assessment of the hemodynamic significance of aortoiliac arterial stenosis by duplex scanning be improved? A comparative study with intraarterial pressure measurement.
    Legemate DA; Teeuwen C; Hoeneveld H; Eikelboom BC
    J Vasc Surg; 1993 Apr; 17(4):676-84. PubMed ID: 8464085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Detection of sub-critical arterial stenoses by hyperaemic Doppler.
    Currie IC; Wilson YG; Baird RN; Lamont PM
    Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg; 1996 Jan; 11(1):29-35. PubMed ID: 8564483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Studies by pulsed Doppler ultrasonography of velocity fields downstream of graded stenoses on the abdominal aorta in pigs.
    Kim WY; Pedersen EM; Nygaard H; Sømod L; Hasenkam JM
    J Vasc Surg; 1994 Mar; 19(3):414-25. PubMed ID: 8126854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Analysis and comparison of pressure gradients and ratios for predicting iliac stenosis.
    Archie JP
    Ann Vasc Surg; 1994 May; 8(3):271-80. PubMed ID: 8043361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Accuracy of duplex scanning in the prediction of pressure gradients across peripheral artery stenoses.
    Strauss AL; Karasch T; Roth FJ
    Bildgebung; 1993 Dec; 60(4):294-6. PubMed ID: 8118203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The use of deep duplex scanning to predict hemodynamically significant aortoiliac stenoses.
    Langsfeld M; Nepute J; Hershey FB; Thorpe L; Auer AI; Binnington HB; Hurley JJ; Peterson GJ; Schwartz R; Woods JJ
    J Vasc Surg; 1988 Mar; 7(3):395-9. PubMed ID: 2964532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [In vitro evaluation of the intravasal Doppler guide wire: determination of hemodynamic effects of stenoses in a flow model].
    Hoppe M; Wagner HJ; Kunisch M; Froelich JJ; Klose KJ
    Rofo; 1997 Jun; 166(6):544-9. PubMed ID: 9273009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The accuracy of Doppler ultrasound measurement of pressure gradients across irregular, dual, and tunnellike obstructions to blood flow.
    Teirstein PS; Yock PG; Popp RL
    Circulation; 1985 Sep; 72(3):577-84. PubMed ID: 3893794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. In Vivo Validation of Patient-Specific Pressure Gradient Calculations for Iliac Artery Stenosis Severity Assessment.
    Heinen SGH; van den Heuvel DAF; Huberts W; de Boer SW; van de Vosse FN; Delhaas T; de Vries JPM
    J Am Heart Assoc; 2017 Dec; 6(12):. PubMed ID: 29275367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Validation of Doppler-derived pulmonary arterial pressure in patients with ductus arteriosus under different hemodynamic states.
    Musewe NN; Smallhorn JF; Benson LN; Burrows PE; Freedom RM
    Circulation; 1987 Nov; 76(5):1081-91. PubMed ID: 2959394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Doppler ophthalmic blood pressure measurement in the hemodynamic evaluation of occlusive carotid artery disease.
    Strauss AL; Rieger H; Roth FJ; Schoop W
    Stroke; 1989 Aug; 20(8):1012-5. PubMed ID: 2667198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Arterial stenosis murmurs: an analysis of flow and pressure fields.
    Abdallah SA; Hwang NH
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1988 Jan; 83(1):318-34. PubMed ID: 2963847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.