67 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1619736)
1. From the Centers for Disease Control. Public health focus: mammography.
JAMA; 1992 Jul 22-29; 268(4):452-3. PubMed ID: 1619736
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Public health focus: mammography.
Centers for Disease Control (CDC)
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep; 1992 Jun; 41(25):454-9. PubMed ID: 1608394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Mammography screening in Germany: how, when and why?].
Bick U
Rofo; 2006 Oct; 178(10):957-69. PubMed ID: 17021975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The impact of alternative practices on the cost and quality of mammographic screening in the United States.
Burnside E; Belkora J; Esserman L
Clin Breast Cancer; 2001 Jul; 2(2):145-52. PubMed ID: 11899786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Use of mammography--United States, 1990.
Centers for Disease Control (CDC)
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep; 1990 Sep; 39(36):621, 627-30. PubMed ID: 2118588
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. The feasibility of breast cancer screening.
Health Technol; 1987; 1(1):26-37. PubMed ID: 10311915
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Performance goals for an adjunct diagnostic test to reduce unnecessary biopsies after screening mammography: analysis of costs, benefits, and consequences.
Lee CI; Bensink ME; Berry K; Musa Z; Bodnar C; Dann R; Jarvik JG; Lehman CD; Ramsey SD
J Am Coll Radiol; 2013 Dec; 10(12):924-30. PubMed ID: 24295942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The radiologist as clinician.
Kozlowski K
Adm Radiol; 1995 Sep; 14(9):35-8, 43-4. PubMed ID: 10152263
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Mammographic screening for breast cancer: An invited review of the benefits and costs.
Greif JM
Breast; 2010 Aug; 19(4):268-72. PubMed ID: 20371181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. From the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Mammography and clinical breast examinations among women aged 50 years and older--Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, 1992.
JAMA; 1993 Oct; 270(15):1792-3. PubMed ID: 8411512
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. [Mammography screening as early detection measure. Pro].
Koch MG
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 1996; 259 Suppl 1():S161-77. PubMed ID: 9133270
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Stat bite: Frequency of breast cancer screening by health plan, 2000-2003.
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2004 Nov; 96(22):1657. PubMed ID: 15547177
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. The muddle over screening breast Ca.
Thomas P
Med World News; 1988 May; 29(9):34-6, 42, 47-8. PubMed ID: 10312486
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. The cost-effectiveness of mammographic screening strategies.
Lindfors KK; Rosenquist CJ
JAMA; 1995 Sep; 274(11):881-4. PubMed ID: 7674501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Economic aspects of MR-mammography in dense breasts.
Kaiser CG; Reich C; Wasser K; Schönberg SO; Kaiser WA
Eur J Radiol; 2012 Sep; 81 Suppl 1():S69-71. PubMed ID: 23083609
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Financial barriers to mammography: who pays out-of-pocket?
Makuc DM; Breen N; Meissner HI; Vernon SW; Cohen A
J Womens Health (Larchmt); 2007 Apr; 16(3):349-60. PubMed ID: 17439380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Toward effective application of efficacious cancer control interventions.
Urban N; Thompson B; Pasket E
Prog Clin Biol Res; 1987; 248():39-51. PubMed ID: 3118390
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Mammoscam.
Randal J
N C Med J; 1993 May; 54(5):194-5; discussion 196-9. PubMed ID: 8510774
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. [Offering mammography is beneficial in the long run].
Cederblom S
Lakartidningen; 1995 Dec; 92(51-52):4865-8. PubMed ID: 8544497
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Screening mammography in women 40 to 49 years of age.
Lisby MD
Am Fam Physician; 2004 Nov; 70(9):1750-2. PubMed ID: 15554494
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
