These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

62 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1619736)

  • 1. From the Centers for Disease Control. Public health focus: mammography.
    JAMA; 1992 Jul 22-29; 268(4):452-3. PubMed ID: 1619736
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Public health focus: mammography.
    Centers for Disease Control (CDC)
    MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep; 1992 Jun; 41(25):454-9. PubMed ID: 1608394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Mammography screening in Germany: how, when and why?].
    Bick U
    Rofo; 2006 Oct; 178(10):957-69. PubMed ID: 17021975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The impact of alternative practices on the cost and quality of mammographic screening in the United States.
    Burnside E; Belkora J; Esserman L
    Clin Breast Cancer; 2001 Jul; 2(2):145-52. PubMed ID: 11899786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Use of mammography--United States, 1990.
    Centers for Disease Control (CDC)
    MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep; 1990 Sep; 39(36):621, 627-30. PubMed ID: 2118588
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The feasibility of breast cancer screening.
    Health Technol; 1987; 1(1):26-37. PubMed ID: 10311915
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Performance goals for an adjunct diagnostic test to reduce unnecessary biopsies after screening mammography: analysis of costs, benefits, and consequences.
    Lee CI; Bensink ME; Berry K; Musa Z; Bodnar C; Dann R; Jarvik JG; Lehman CD; Ramsey SD
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2013 Dec; 10(12):924-30. PubMed ID: 24295942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The radiologist as clinician.
    Kozlowski K
    Adm Radiol; 1995 Sep; 14(9):35-8, 43-4. PubMed ID: 10152263
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Mammographic screening for breast cancer: An invited review of the benefits and costs.
    Greif JM
    Breast; 2010 Aug; 19(4):268-72. PubMed ID: 20371181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. From the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Mammography and clinical breast examinations among women aged 50 years and older--Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, 1992.
    JAMA; 1993 Oct; 270(15):1792-3. PubMed ID: 8411512
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Mammography screening as early detection measure. Pro].
    Koch MG
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 1996; 259 Suppl 1():S161-77. PubMed ID: 9133270
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Stat bite: Frequency of breast cancer screening by health plan, 2000-2003.
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2004 Nov; 96(22):1657. PubMed ID: 15547177
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The muddle over screening breast Ca.
    Thomas P
    Med World News; 1988 May; 29(9):34-6, 42, 47-8. PubMed ID: 10312486
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The cost-effectiveness of mammographic screening strategies.
    Lindfors KK; Rosenquist CJ
    JAMA; 1995 Sep; 274(11):881-4. PubMed ID: 7674501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Economic aspects of MR-mammography in dense breasts.
    Kaiser CG; Reich C; Wasser K; Schönberg SO; Kaiser WA
    Eur J Radiol; 2012 Sep; 81 Suppl 1():S69-71. PubMed ID: 23083609
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Financial barriers to mammography: who pays out-of-pocket?
    Makuc DM; Breen N; Meissner HI; Vernon SW; Cohen A
    J Womens Health (Larchmt); 2007 Apr; 16(3):349-60. PubMed ID: 17439380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Toward effective application of efficacious cancer control interventions.
    Urban N; Thompson B; Pasket E
    Prog Clin Biol Res; 1987; 248():39-51. PubMed ID: 3118390
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Mammoscam.
    Randal J
    N C Med J; 1993 May; 54(5):194-5; discussion 196-9. PubMed ID: 8510774
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Offering mammography is beneficial in the long run].
    Cederblom S
    Lakartidningen; 1995 Dec; 92(51-52):4865-8. PubMed ID: 8544497
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Screening mammography in women 40 to 49 years of age.
    Lisby MD
    Am Fam Physician; 2004 Nov; 70(9):1750-2. PubMed ID: 15554494
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.