BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

350 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16197678)

  • 1. Biases in attentional orientation and magnitude estimation explain crossover: neglect is a disorder of both.
    Mennemeier M; Pierce CA; Chatterjee A; Anderson B; Jewell G; Dowler R; Woods AJ; Glenn T; Mark VW
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2005 Aug; 17(8):1194-211. PubMed ID: 16197678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Crossover is not a consequence of neglect: a test of the orientation/estimation hypothesis.
    Mennemeier M; Vezey E; Lamar M; Jewell G
    J Int Neuropsychol Soc; 2002 Jan; 8(1):107-14. PubMed ID: 11843067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Crossover by line length and spatial location.
    Mennemeier M; Rapcsak SZ; Pierce C; Vezey E
    Brain Cogn; 2001 Dec; 47(3):412-22. PubMed ID: 11748897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Weight and see: Line bisection in neglect reliably measures the allocation of attention, but not the perception of length.
    McIntosh RD; Ietswaart M; Milner AD
    Neuropsychologia; 2017 Nov; 106():146-158. PubMed ID: 28923304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Image of a line is not shrunk but neglected. Absence of crossover in unilateral spatial neglect.
    Ishiai S; Koyama Y; Nakano N; Seki K; Nishida Y; Hayashi K
    Neuropsychologia; 2004; 42(2):251-6. PubMed ID: 14644110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Representational neglect for words as revealed by bisection tasks.
    Arduino LS; Marinelli CV; Pasotti F; Ferrè ER; Bottini G
    J Neuropsychol; 2012 Mar; 6(1):43-64. PubMed ID: 22257574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Can Crossover and Altered Magnitude Estimation in Neglect Be Explained by Contextual Effects?
    Jewell GR; Salem J; Hartley S; Vezey E; Mark VW; Mennemeier MS
    Adv Neurol Neurosci Res; 2022; 3():. PubMed ID: 35969715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Diagonal spatial neglect.
    Mark VW; Heilman KM
    J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry; 1998 Sep; 65(3):348-52. PubMed ID: 9728947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The psychophysical power law and unilateral spatial neglect.
    Chatterjee A; Mennemeier M; Heilman KM
    Brain Cogn; 1994 May; 25(1):92-107. PubMed ID: 8043269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. "Mind the gap": the size-distance dissociation in visual neglect is a cueing effect.
    McIntosh RD; McClements KI; Dijkerman HC; Milner AD
    Cortex; 2004 Apr; 40(2):339-46. PubMed ID: 15156792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effects of visible and invisible cueing on line bisection and Landmark performance in hemispatial neglect.
    Olk B; Harvey M
    Neuropsychologia; 2002; 40(3):282-90. PubMed ID: 11684161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Attention biases the perceived midpoint of horizontal lines.
    Toba MN; Cavanagh P; Bartolomeo P
    Neuropsychologia; 2011 Jan; 49(2):238-46. PubMed ID: 21110990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Rightward and leftward bisection biases in spatial neglect: two sides of the same coin?
    Savazzi S; Posteraro L; Veronesi G; Mancini F
    Brain; 2007 Aug; 130(Pt 8):2070-84. PubMed ID: 17584772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Line bisection under an attentional gradient induced by simulated neglect in healthy subjects.
    Grewal P; Viswanathan J; Barton JJ; Lanyon LJ
    Neuropsychologia; 2012 May; 50(6):1190-201. PubMed ID: 22118912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Dissecting the component deficits of perceptual imbalance in visual neglect: evidence from horizontal-vertical length comparisons.
    Charras P; Lupiáñez J; Migliaccio R; Toba M; Pradat-Diehl P; Duret C; Bartolomeo P
    Cortex; 2012 May; 48(5):540-52. PubMed ID: 21371700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. How does phasic alerting improve performance in patients with unilateral neglect? A systematic analysis of attentional processing capacity and spatial weighting mechanisms.
    Finke K; Matthias E; Keller I; Müller HJ; Schneider WX; Bublak P
    Neuropsychologia; 2012 May; 50(6):1178-89. PubMed ID: 22386879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The end of the line: Antagonistic attentional weightings in unilateral neglect.
    McIntosh RD
    Cortex; 2018 Oct; 107():220-228. PubMed ID: 28807326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Selective spatial attention and length representation in normal subjects and in patients with unilateral spatial neglect.
    Nichelli P; Rinaldi M; Cubelli R
    Brain Cogn; 1989 Jan; 9(1):57-70. PubMed ID: 2912475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Visuospatial attention in line bisection: stimulus modulation of pseudoneglect.
    McCourt ME; Jewell G
    Neuropsychologia; 1999 Jun; 37(7):843-55. PubMed ID: 10408651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Context effects in pseudo-neglect measured with a free vision Landmark task.
    Rueckert L; McFadden HG
    Laterality; 2004 Oct; 9(4):421-32. PubMed ID: 15513239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.