These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

350 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16197678)

  • 21. Ipsilesional attentional-approach neglect or crossover effect.
    Drago V; Jeong Y; Crucian GP; Fitzgerald DB; Finney GR; Mizuno T; Pisani F; Heilman KM
    Neurocase; 2006 Aug; 12(4):207-11. PubMed ID: 17000588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The Character-line Bisection Task: a new test for hemispatial neglect.
    Lee BH; Kang SJ; Park JM; Son Y; Lee KH; Adair JC; Heilman KM; Na DL
    Neuropsychologia; 2004; 42(12):1715-24. PubMed ID: 15327939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Influence of moving background on line bisection performance in the normal elderly versus patients with hemispatial neglect.
    Choi KM; Lee BH; Lee SC; Ku BD; Kim EJ; Suh MK; Jeong Y; Heilman KM; Na DL
    Am J Phys Med Rehabil; 2007 Jul; 86(7):515-26. PubMed ID: 17581286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Individual variation in line bisection: a study of normal subjects with application to the interpretation of visual neglect.
    Manning L; Halligan PW; Marshall JC
    Neuropsychologia; 1990; 28(7):647-55. PubMed ID: 2215876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Context and crossover in unilateral neglect.
    Ricci R; Chatterjee A
    Neuropsychologia; 2001; 39(11):1138-43. PubMed ID: 11527550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. To see or not to see: the effects of visible and invisible cues on line bisection judgements in unilateral neglect.
    Mattingley JB; Pierson JM; Bradshaw JL; Phillips JG; Bradshaw JA
    Neuropsychologia; 1993 Nov; 31(11):1201-15. PubMed ID: 8107981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The line bisection bias as a deficit of proportional reasoning - evidence from number line estimation in neglect.
    Smaczny S; Klein E; Jung S; Moeller K; Karnath HO
    Neuropsychologia; 2024 Apr; 196():108848. PubMed ID: 38432323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Causes of cross-over in unilateral neglect: between-group comparisons, within-patient dissociations and eye movements.
    Doricchi F; Guariglia P; Figliozzi F; Silvetti M; Bruno G; Gasparini M
    Brain; 2005 Jun; 128(Pt 6):1386-406. PubMed ID: 15758037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Triangular backgrounds shift the bias of line bisection performance in hemispatial neglect.
    Shulman MB; Alexander MP; McGlinchey-Berroth R; Milberg W
    J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry; 2002 Jan; 72(1):68-72. PubMed ID: 11784828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The cross-over effect in unilateral neglect. Modelling detailed data in the line-bisection task.
    Monaghan P; Shillcock R
    Brain; 1998 May; 121 ( Pt 5)():907-21. PubMed ID: 9619193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Contributions of the left and right cerebral hemispheres to line bisection.
    Mennemeier M; Vezey E; Chatterjee A; Rapcsak SZ; Heilman KM
    Neuropsychologia; 1997 May; 35(5):703-15. PubMed ID: 9153033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Line versus representational bisections in unilateral spatial neglect.
    Ishiai S; Koyama Y; Seki K; Izawa M
    J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry; 2000 Dec; 69(6):745-50. PubMed ID: 11080226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Line and word bisection in right-brain-damaged patients with left spatial neglect.
    Veronelli L; Vallar G; Marinelli CV; Primativo S; Arduino LS
    Exp Brain Res; 2014 Jan; 232(1):133-46. PubMed ID: 24146192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Does spatial cueing affect line bisection in chronic hemianopia?
    Kuhn C; Rosenthal A; Bublak P; Grotemeyer KH; Reinhart S; Kerkhoff G
    Neuropsychologia; 2012 Jun; 50(7):1656-62. PubMed ID: 22480681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. A mathematical model of line bisection behaviour in neglect.
    Anderson B
    Brain; 1996 Jun; 119 ( Pt 3)():841-50. PubMed ID: 8673496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Radial bisection of words and lines in right-brain-damaged patients with spatial neglect.
    Veronelli L; Arduino LS; Girelli L; Vallar G
    J Neuropsychol; 2017 Sep; 11(3):396-413. PubMed ID: 26611497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Stimulus- and state-dependence of systematic bias in spatial attention: additive effects of stimulus-size and time-on-task.
    Benwell CS; Harvey M; Gardner S; Thut G
    Cortex; 2013 Mar; 49(3):827-36. PubMed ID: 22270326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Is the middle between both halves?: midpoint location and segment size estimation in neglect.
    Riestra AR; Womack KB; Crucian GP; Heilman KM
    Neurology; 2002 Nov; 59(10):1580-4. PubMed ID: 12451201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Influence of contextual stimuli on line bisection.
    Chieffi S; Ricci M
    Percept Mot Skills; 2002 Dec; 95(3 Pt 1):868-74. PubMed ID: 12509186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Dissociation of sensory-attentional from motor-intentional neglect.
    Na DL; Adair JC; Williamson DJ; Schwartz RL; Haws B; Heilman KM
    J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry; 1998 Mar; 64(3):331-8. PubMed ID: 9527144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.