These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

244 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16198356)

  • 21. Total disc replacement positioning affects facet contact forces and vertebral body strains.
    Rundell SA; Auerbach JD; Balderston RA; Kurtz SM
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Nov; 33(23):2510-7. PubMed ID: 18978591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Evaluation of load transfer characteristics of a dynamic stabilization device on disc loading under compression.
    Zhang QH; Zhou YL; Petit D; Teo EC
    Med Eng Phys; 2009 Jun; 31(5):533-8. PubMed ID: 19038569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Buck's direct repair of lumbar spondylolysis restores disc stresses at the involved and adjacent levels.
    Sairyo K; Goel VK; Faizan A; Vadapalli S; Biyani S; Ebraheim N
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2006 Dec; 21(10):1020-6. PubMed ID: 16959387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Interlaminar shear stresses and laminae separation in a disc. Finite element analysis of the L3-L4 motion segment subjected to axial compressive loads.
    Goel VK; Monroe BT; Gilbertson LG; Brinckmann P
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1995 Mar; 20(6):689-98. PubMed ID: 7604345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Effect of an interspinous implant on loads in the lumbar spine.
    Rohlmann A; Zander T; Burra NK; Bergmann G
    Biomed Tech (Berl); 2005 Oct; 50(10):343-7. PubMed ID: 16300050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Effect of a posterior dynamic implant adjacent to a rigid spinal fixator.
    Zander T; Rohlmann A; Burra NK; Bergmann G
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2006 Oct; 21(8):767-74. PubMed ID: 16750875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Influence of different artificial disc kinematics on spine biomechanics.
    Zander T; Rohlmann A; Bergmann G
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2009 Feb; 24(2):135-42. PubMed ID: 19121822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Biomechanical investigation on the influence of the regional material degeneration of an intervertebral disc in a lower lumbar spinal unit: A finite element study.
    Masni-Azian ; Tanaka M
    Comput Biol Med; 2018 Jul; 98():26-38. PubMed ID: 29758454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Comparison of biomechanical function at ideal and varied surgical placement for two lumbar artificial disc implant designs: mobile-core versus fixed-core.
    Moumene M; Geisler FH
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Aug; 32(17):1840-51. PubMed ID: 17762291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Influence of the geometry of a ball-and-socket intervertebral prosthesis at the cervical spine: a finite element study.
    Rousseau MA; Bonnet X; Skalli W
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Jan; 33(1):E10-4. PubMed ID: 18165735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Application of a new calibration method for a three-dimensional finite element model of a human lumbar annulus fibrosus.
    Schmidt H; Heuer F; Simon U; Kettler A; Rohlmann A; Claes L; Wilke HJ
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2006 May; 21(4):337-44. PubMed ID: 16439042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. A three-dimensional nonlinear finite element analysis of the mechanical behavior of tissue engineered intervertebral discs under complex loads.
    Yao J; Turteltaub SR; Ducheyne P
    Biomaterials; 2006 Jan; 27(3):377-87. PubMed ID: 16168476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Does disc space height of fused segment affect adjacent degeneration in ALIF? A finite element study.
    Tang S; Meng X
    Turk Neurosurg; 2011; 21(3):296-303. PubMed ID: 21845564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Influence of surgical treatment for disc degeneration disease at C5-C6 on changes in some biomechanical parameters of the cervical spine.
    Li Y; Lewis G
    Med Eng Phys; 2010 Jul; 32(6):595-603. PubMed ID: 20211575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Biomechanical comparison between lumbar disc arthroplasty and fusion.
    Chen SH; Zhong ZC; Chen CS; Chen WJ; Hung C
    Med Eng Phys; 2009 Mar; 31(2):244-53. PubMed ID: 18760654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Influence prediction of injury and vibration on adjacent components of spine using finite element methods.
    Guo LX; Teo EC
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2006 Apr; 19(2):118-24. PubMed ID: 16760786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Cervical spine biomechanics following implantation of a disc prosthesis.
    Galbusera F; Bellini CM; Raimondi MT; Fornari M; Assietti R
    Med Eng Phys; 2008 Nov; 30(9):1127-33. PubMed ID: 18359659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Effects of degenerated intervertebral discs on intersegmental rotations, intradiscal pressures, and facet joint forces of the whole lumbar spine.
    Park WM; Kim K; Kim YH
    Comput Biol Med; 2013 Sep; 43(9):1234-40. PubMed ID: 23930818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. [Finite element analysis on stress change of the lumbar disc degeneration].
    Yan JZ; Wu ZH; Wang XS; Xing ZJ; Zhao Y; Zhang JG; Wang YP; Qiu GX
    Zhongguo Yi Xue Ke Xue Yuan Xue Bao; 2009 Aug; 31(4):464-7. PubMed ID: 19771735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Contribution of disc degeneration to osteophyte formation in the cervical spine: a biomechanical investigation.
    Kumaresan S; Yoganandan N; Pintar FA; Maiman DJ; Goel VK
    J Orthop Res; 2001 Sep; 19(5):977-84. PubMed ID: 11562150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.