BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

66 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16198400)

  • 21. Knowledge of the cervical cancer screening process among rural and urban illinois women undergoing colposcopy.
    Massad LS; Verhulst SJ; Hagemeyer M; Brady P
    J Low Genit Tract Dis; 2006 Oct; 10(4):252-5. PubMed ID: 17012992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. [Are analyses of cytological cervix smears from young women more harmful than beneficial?].
    Skjeldestad FE; Hagen B; Hagmar B; Iversen OE; Juvkam KH; Steen R; Thoresen S; Hareide B
    Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2007 Jun; 127(13):1782-5. PubMed ID: 17599128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Cervical cancer screening in Thailand: an overview.
    Sriamporn S; Khuhaprema T; Parkin M
    J Med Screen; 2006; 13 Suppl 1():S39-43. PubMed ID: 17227641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Is cytologic screening an effective surveillance method for detection of vaginal recurrence of uterine cancer?
    Cooper AL; Dornfeld-Finke JM; Banks HW; Davey DD; Modesitt SC
    Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Jan; 107(1):71-6. PubMed ID: 16394042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Alternative cervical cancer prevention in low-resource settings: Experiences of visual inspection by acetic acid with single-visit approach in the first five provinces of Thailand.
    Palanuwong B
    Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2007 Feb; 47(1):54-60. PubMed ID: 17261102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Hispanic acculturation and utilization of cervical cancer screening in the US.
    Shah M; Zhu K; Wu H; Potter J
    Prev Med; 2006 Feb; 42(2):146-9. PubMed ID: 16297444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. [Quality of the Early Cervical Cancer Detection Program in the State of Nuevo León].
    Salinas-Martínez AM; Villarreal-Ríos E; Garza-Elizondo ME; Fraire-Gloria JM; López-Franco JJ; Barboza-Quintana O
    Salud Publica Mex; 1997; 39(3):187-94. PubMed ID: 9304221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Cervical cytology in vulnerable pregnant women.
    Loomis DM; Pastore PA; Rejman K; Gutierrez KL; Bethea B
    J Am Acad Nurse Pract; 2009 May; 21(5):287-94. PubMed ID: 19432913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Can breast and cervical cancer screening visits be used to enhance colorectal cancer screening?
    Carlos RC; Fendrick AM; Ellis J; Bernstein SJ
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2004 Oct; 1(10):769-76. PubMed ID: 17411698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. [Cervical cancer screening and associated treatment costs in France].
    Bergeron C; Breugelmans JG; Bouée S; Lorans C; Bénard S; Rémy V
    Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2006 Nov; 34(11):1036-42. PubMed ID: 17070085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Cost-effectiveness of adding human papilloma virus testing to a managed care cervical cancer screening program.
    Lonky NM; Hunter MI; Sadeghi M; Edwards G; Bajamundi K; Monk BJ
    J Low Genit Tract Dis; 2007 Oct; 11(4):258-64. PubMed ID: 17917570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Screening history of women in Malmö with invasive cervical cancer.
    Lindqvist PG; Hellsten C; Rippe A
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2008 Mar; 137(1):77-83. PubMed ID: 17210219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Organisation of cervical cytology screening in Croatia: past, present and future.
    Pajtler M; Audy-Jurković S; Kardum-Skelin I; Mahovlić V; Mozetic-Vrdoljak D; Ovanin-Rakić A
    Coll Antropol; 2007 Apr; 31 Suppl 2():47-54. PubMed ID: 17598505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. [Cervical cancer after 10 years of nationally coordinated screening].
    Haldorsen T; Skare GB; Steen R; Thoresen SO
    Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2008 Mar; 128(6):682-5. PubMed ID: 18337847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Current techniques in screening for cervical cancer in Spain: updated recommendations.
    Puig-Tintoré LM; Torné A; Alonso I
    Gynecol Oncol; 2008 Sep; 110(3 Suppl 2):S8-S10. PubMed ID: 18606440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Effect of an antepartum Pap smear on the coverage of a cervical cancer screening programme: a population-based prospective study.
    Nygård M; Daltveit AK; Thoresen SO; Nygård JF
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2007 Jan; 7():10. PubMed ID: 17244348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Crossing the quality chasm: a requirement for successful cervical cancer prevention in developing countries.
    Suba EJ
    Clin Lab Med; 2004 Dec; 24(4):945-63. PubMed ID: 15555750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Pap screening clinics with native women in Skidegate, Haida Gwaii. Need for innovation.
    Calam B; Norgrove L; Brown D; Wilson MA
    Can Fam Physician; 1999 Feb; 45():355-60. PubMed ID: 10065309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. External quality assurance for cervical cytology in developing countries. Experience in Peru and Nicaragua.
    Salvetto M; Sandiford P
    Acta Cytol; 2004; 48(1):23-31. PubMed ID: 14969177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Health education and agency: a comprehensive program for young women in the Mixteca region of Mexico.
    Venguer T; Pick S; Fishbein M
    Psychol Health Med; 2007 Aug; 12(4):389-406. PubMed ID: 17620204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.