141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16198505)
1. Use of CT simulation for treatment of cervical cancer to assess the adequacy of lymph node coverage of conventional pelvic fields based on bony landmarks.
Finlay MH; Ackerman I; Tirona RG; Hamilton P; Barbera L; Thomas G
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2006 Jan; 64(1):205-9. PubMed ID: 16198505
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluation of pelvic lymph node coverage of conventional radiotherapy fields based on bony landmarks in Chinese cervical cancer patients using CT simulation.
Zhang X; Yu H
J Zhejiang Univ Sci B; 2009 Sep; 10(9):683-8. PubMed ID: 19735101
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Bony landmarks are not an adequate substitute for lymphangiography in defining pelvic lymph node location for the treatment of cervical cancer with radiotherapy.
Bonin SR; Lanciano RM; Corn BW; Hogan WM; Hartz WH; Hanks GE
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1996 Jan; 34(1):167-72. PubMed ID: 12118547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Use of CT simulation for treatment of cervical cancer to assess the adequacy of lymph node coverage of conventional pelvic fields based on bony landmarks: In regard to Finlay et al. (Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2006;64:205-209).
Yazici G; Yildiz F; Cengiz M; Ozyigit G; Selek U; Genç M; Atahan IL
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2006 Aug; 65(5):1594; author reply 1594. PubMed ID: 16863938
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. CT Simulation to Evaluate of Pelvic Lymph Node Coverage in Conventional Radiotherapy Fields Based on Bone and Vessels Landmarks in Prostate Cancer Patients.
Yousefi Kashi AS; Khaledi S; Houshyari M
Iran J Cancer Prev; 2016 Jun; 9(3):e6233. PubMed ID: 27703649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Interindividual variability of lymph drainages in patients with cervical cancer. Implication on irradiation planning.
Marnitz S; Köhler C; Schneider A; Seiler F; Hinkelbein W
Strahlenther Onkol; 2006 Feb; 182(2):80-5. PubMed ID: 16447014
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Conventional four-field pelvic radiotherapy technique without computed tomography-treatment planning in cancer of the cervix: potential geographic miss and its impact on pelvic control.
Kim RY; McGinnis LS; Spencer SA; Meredith RF; Jennelle RL; Salter MM
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1995 Jan; 31(1):109-12. PubMed ID: 7995740
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Vessel-contouring-based pelvic radiotherapy in patients with uterine cervical cancer.
Uno T; Isobe K; Ueno N; Kobayashi H; Sanayama Y; Mitsuhashi A; Shozu M; Ito H
Jpn J Clin Oncol; 2009 Jun; 39(6):376-80. PubMed ID: 19351660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Anatomic study of the pelvis in carcinoma of the uterine cervix as related to the box technique.
Zunino S; Rosato O; Lucino S; Jauregui E; Rossi L; Venencia D
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1999 Apr; 44(1):53-9. PubMed ID: 10219794
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Magnetic resonance imaging in the treatment planning of radiation therapy in carcinoma of the cervix treated with the four-field pelvic technique.
Thomas L; Chacon B; Kind M; Lasbareilles O; Muyldermans P; Chemin A; Le Treut A; Pigneux J; Kantor G
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1997 Mar; 37(4):827-32. PubMed ID: 9128958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Patterns of Lymph Node Failure after Dose-escalated Radiotherapy: Implications for Extended Pelvic Lymph Node Coverage.
Spratt DE; Vargas HA; Zumsteg ZS; Golia Pernicka JS; Osborne JR; Pei X; Zelefsky MJ
Eur Urol; 2017 Jan; 71(1):37-43. PubMed ID: 27523595
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Clinical significance of geographic miss when using conventional four field radiotherapy technique in treatment of locally advanced carcinoma cervix.
Gulia A; Patel FD; Santam C; Bhavana R; Reena K; Sharma SC
Indian J Cancer; 2016; 53(1):80-5. PubMed ID: 27146749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A consensus-based guideline defining the clinical target volume for pelvic lymph nodes in external beam radiotherapy for uterine cervical cancer.
; Toita T; Ohno T; Kaneyasu Y; Uno T; Yoshimura R; Kodaira T; Furutani K; Kasuya G; Ishikura S; Kamura T; Hiraoka M
Jpn J Clin Oncol; 2010 May; 40(5):456-63. PubMed ID: 20133334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Pelvic nodal CTV from L4-L5 or aortic bifurcation? An audit of the patterns of regional failures in cervical cancer patients treated with pelvic radiotherapy.
Rai B; Bansal A; Patel F; Gulia A; Kapoor R; Sharma SC
Jpn J Clin Oncol; 2014 Oct; 44(10):941-7. PubMed ID: 25104792
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Gynecologic radiotherapy fields defined by intraoperative measurements.
Greer BE; Koh WJ; Figge DC; Russell AH; Cain JM; Tamimi HK
Gynecol Oncol; 1990 Sep; 38(3):421-4. PubMed ID: 2227555
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A verification study of proposed pelvic lymph node localisation guidelines using nanoparticle-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging.
Vilarino-Varela MJ; Taylor A; Rockall AG; Reznek RH; Powell ME
Radiother Oncol; 2008 Nov; 89(2):192-6. PubMed ID: 18771811
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Conventional four-field pelvic radiotherapy technique without CT treatment planning in cancer of the cervix: potential geographic miss.
Kim RY; McGinnis LS; Spencer SA; Meredith RF; Jennelle RL; Salter MM
Radiother Oncol; 1994 Feb; 30(2):140-5. PubMed ID: 8184111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. IMRT dose escalation for positive para-aortic lymph nodes in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer while reducing dose to bone marrow and other organs at risk.
Ahmed RS; Kim RY; Duan J; Meleth S; De Los Santos JF; Fiveash JB
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2004 Oct; 60(2):505-12. PubMed ID: 15380585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation of the use of computed tomography versus conventional orthogonal X-ray simulation in the treatment of rectal cancer.
Chao M; Gibbs P; Tjandra J; Darben P; Lim-Joon D; Jones IT
Australas Radiol; 2005 Apr; 49(2):122-6. PubMed ID: 15845048
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Role of bipedal lymphangiogram in radiation treatment planning for cervix cancer.
Pendlebury SC; Cahill S; Crandon AJ; Bull CA
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1993 Nov; 27(4):959-62. PubMed ID: 8244829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
