These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
325 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16199322)
1. Cervical brachytherapy utilizing ring applicator: comparison of standard and conformal loading. Brooks S; Bownes P; Lowe G; Bryant L; Hoskin PJ Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2005 Nov; 63(3):934-9. PubMed ID: 16199322 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A dose-volume analysis of magnetic resonance imaging-aided high-dose-rate image-based interstitial brachytherapy for uterine cervical cancer. Yoshida K; Yamazaki H; Takenaka T; Kotsuma T; Yoshida M; Furuya S; Tanaka E; Uegaki T; Kuriyama K; Matsumoto H; Yamada S; Ban C Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2010 Jul; 77(3):765-72. PubMed ID: 19836165 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Conventional, conformal, and intensity-modulated radiation therapy treatment planning of external beam radiotherapy for cervical cancer: The impact of tumor regression. van de Bunt L; van der Heide UA; Ketelaars M; de Kort GA; Jürgenliemk-Schulz IM Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2006 Jan; 64(1):189-96. PubMed ID: 15978745 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Magnetic resonance imaging-guided intracavitary brachytherapy for cancer of the cervix. Zwahlen D; Jezioranski J; Chan P; Haider MA; Cho YB; Yeung I; Levin W; Manchul L; Fyles A; Milosevic M Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2009 Jul; 74(4):1157-64. PubMed ID: 19101097 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Point vs. volumetric bladder and rectal doses in combined intracavitary-interstitial high-dose-rate brachytherapy: correlation and comparison with published Vienna applicator data. Yaparpalvi R; Mutyala S; Gorla GR; Butler J; Mah D; Garg MK; Kalnicki S Brachytherapy; 2008; 7(4):336-42. PubMed ID: 18782683 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Dose and volume parameters for MRI-based treatment planning in intracavitary brachytherapy for cervical cancer. Kirisits C; Pötter R; Lang S; Dimopoulos J; Wachter-Gerstner N; Georg D Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2005 Jul; 62(3):901-11. PubMed ID: 15936576 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Clinical impact of computed tomography-based image-guided brachytherapy for cervix cancer using the tandem-ring applicator - the Addenbrooke's experience. Tan LT; Coles CE; Hart C; Tait E Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol); 2009 Apr; 21(3):175-82. PubMed ID: 19101130 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Single versus customized treatment planning for image-guided high-dose-rate brachytherapy for cervical cancer: dosimetric comparison and predicting factor for organs at risk overdose with single plan approach. Chi A; Gao M; Sinacore J; Nguyen NP; Vali F; Albuquerque K Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2009 Sep; 75(1):309-14. PubMed ID: 19540070 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Image-guided cervix high-dose-rate brachytherapy treatment planning: does custom computed tomography planning for each insertion provide better conformal avoidance of organs at risk? Davidson MT; Yuen J; D'Souza DP; Batchelar DL Brachytherapy; 2008; 7(1):37-42. PubMed ID: 18299111 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparative study of reference points by dosimetric analyses for late complications after uniform external radiotherapy and high-dose-rate brachytherapy for cervical cancer. Chen SW; Liang JA; Yeh LS; Yang SN; Shiau AC; Lin FJ Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2004 Oct; 60(2):663-71. PubMed ID: 15380604 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of low and high dose rate brachytherapy in the treatment of uterine cervix cancer. Retrospective analysis of two sequential series. Ferrigno R; Nishimoto IN; Novaes PE; Pellizzon AC; Maia MA; Fogarolli RC; Salvajoli JV Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2005 Jul; 62(4):1108-16. PubMed ID: 15990016 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A comparison of ICRU point doses and volumetric doses of organs at risk (OARs) in brachytherapy for cervical cancer. Vinod SK; Caldwell K; Lau A; Fowler AR J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol; 2011 Jun; 55(3):304-10. PubMed ID: 21696566 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Intensity-modulated radiation therapy after hysterectomy: comparison with conventional treatment and sensitivity of the normal-tissue-sparing effect to margin size. Ahamad A; D'Souza W; Salehpour M; Iyer R; Tucker SL; Jhingran A; Eifel PJ Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2005 Jul; 62(4):1117-24. PubMed ID: 15990017 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Geometrical sparing factors for the rectum and bladder in the prediction of grade 2 and higher complications after high-dose-rate brachytherapy for cervical cancer. Chen SW; Liang JA; Hung YC; Yeh LS; Chang WC; Yang SN; Lin FJ Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2009 Dec; 75(5):1335-43. PubMed ID: 19386443 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Preoperative radiation treatment for rectal cancer: comparison of target coverage and small bowel NTCP in conventional vs. 3D-conformal planning. Cella L; Ciscognetti N; Martin G; Liuzzi R; Punzo G; Solla R; Farella A; Salvatore M; Pacelli R Med Dosim; 2009; 34(1):75-81. PubMed ID: 19181259 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Persistently better treatment planning results of intensity-modulated (IMRT) over conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT) in prostate cancer patients with significant variation of clinical target volume and/or organs-at-risk. Fenoglietto P; Laliberte B; Allaw A; Ailleres N; Idri K; Hay MH; Moscardo CL; Gourgou S; Dubois JB; Azria D Radiother Oncol; 2008 Jul; 88(1):77-87. PubMed ID: 18215434 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Combined intensity-modulated radiation therapy and brachytherapy in the treatment of cervical cancer. Macdonald DM; Lin LL; Biehl K; Mutic S; Nantz R; Grigsby PW Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2008 Jun; 71(2):618-24. PubMed ID: 18407429 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Computed tomography-based high-dose-rate intracavitary brachytherapy for uterine cervical cancer: preliminary demonstration of correlation between dose-volume parameters and rectal mucosal changes observed by flexible sigmoidoscopy. Koom WS; Sohn DK; Kim JY; Kim JW; Shin KH; Yoon SM; Kim DY; Yoon M; Shin D; Park SY; Cho KH Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2007 Aug; 68(5):1446-54. PubMed ID: 17482766 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]