These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16199382)

  • 1. Test bed for assessment of the kinematical determination of navigation systems for total knee arthroplasty. Does a limited range of motion of the hip joint influence the accuracy of the determination?
    Schwarz ML; Pott PP; Beck A; Heute S; Scharf HP
    Comput Aided Surg; 2005 Jan; 10(1):51-7. PubMed ID: 16199382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Detection of the center of the hip joint in computer-assisted surgery: an evaluation study of the Surgetics algorithm.
    Stindel E; Gil D; Briard JL; Merloz P; Dubrana F; Lefevre C
    Comput Aided Surg; 2005 May; 10(3):133-9. PubMed ID: 16321910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A cadaveric study to assess the accuracy of computer-assisted surgery in locating the hip center during total knee arthroplasty.
    Picard F; Leitner F; Gregori A; Martin P
    J Arthroplasty; 2007 Jun; 22(4):590-5. PubMed ID: 17562418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Bone morphing system for rotational alignment in total knee arthroplasty].
    Wu H; van Driessche S; Goutallier D
    Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2008 Jan; 22(1):12-5. PubMed ID: 18361228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Rotational alignment of femoral component with computed-assisted surgery (CAS) during total knee arthroplasty].
    Michaut M; Beaufils P; Galaud B; Abadie P; Boisrenoult P; Fallet L
    Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 2008 Oct; 94(6):580-4. PubMed ID: 18929753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Movement mapping as dynamic preoperative surgical planning in total hip replacement. A precondition to navigation?
    Jerosch J; Weipert A; Hanusek S; Schneppenheim M
    Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2002 Jul; 122(6):342-5. PubMed ID: 12136299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of formal methods in hip joint center assessment: an in vitro analysis.
    Lopomo N; Sun L; Zaffagnini S; Giordano G; Safran MR
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2010 Mar; 25(3):206-12. PubMed ID: 20006913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Accuracy of imageless stem navigation during simulated total hip arthroplasty.
    Renkawitz T; Sendtner E; Grifka J; Kalteis T
    Acta Orthop; 2008 Dec; 79(6):785-8. PubMed ID: 19085495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Anatomic hip range of motion after implantation during total hip arthroplasty as measured by a navigation system.
    Miki H; Yamanashi W; Nishii T; Sato Y; Yoshikawa H; Sugano N
    J Arthroplasty; 2007 Oct; 22(7):946-52. PubMed ID: 17920464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Virtual image-guided minimal incision sugary unicondylar knee arthroplasty].
    Yu Z; Wang LM; Gui JC; Hou MF; Yao JD; Song HR; Xu Y
    Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2007 Dec; 87(47):3335-8. PubMed ID: 18478946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Influence of preoperative range of motion on the early clinical outcome of total knee arthroplasty].
    Shi MG; Lü HS; Guan ZP
    Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2006 Aug; 44(16):1101-5. PubMed ID: 17081464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Computer-assisted total-knee arthroplasty. Comparison of two successive systems. Learning curve].
    Bové JC
    Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 2008 May; 94(3):252-60. PubMed ID: 18456060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation of a new algorithm to determine the hip joint center.
    Siston RA; Delp SL
    J Biomech; 2006; 39(1):125-30. PubMed ID: 16271596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Accuracy evaluation of surface-based registration methods in a computer navigation system for hip surgery performed through a posterolateral approach.
    Sugano N; Sasama T; Sato Y; Nakajima Y; Nishii T; Yonenobu K; Tamura S; Ochi T
    Comput Aided Surg; 2001; 6(4):195-203. PubMed ID: 11835614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Joint gap kinematics in posterior-stabilized total knee arthroplasty measured by a new tensor with the navigation system.
    Matsumoto T; Muratsu H; Tsumura N; Mizuno K; Kuroda R; Yoshiya S; Kurosaka M
    J Biomech Eng; 2006 Dec; 128(6):867-71. PubMed ID: 17154688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Accuracy of a computer-assisted navigation system for total knee replacement.
    Pitto RP; Graydon AJ; Bradley L; Malak SF; Walker CG; Anderson IA
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2006 May; 88(5):601-5. PubMed ID: 16645104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Factors affecting hip range of motion in surface replacement arthroplasty.
    Vendittoli PA; Ganapathi M; Nuño N; Plamondon D; Lavigne M
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2007 Nov; 22(9):1004-12. PubMed ID: 17870221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Validation of a computer navigation system and a CT method for determination of the orientation of implanted acetabular cup in total hip arthroplasty: a cadaver study.
    Lin F; Lim D; Wixson RL; Milos S; Hendrix RW; Makhsous M
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2008 Oct; 23(8):1004-11. PubMed ID: 18541352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effects of the femoral offset and the head size on the safe range of motion in total hip arthroplasty.
    Matsushita A; Nakashima Y; Jingushi S; Yamamoto T; Kuraoka A; Iwamoto Y
    J Arthroplasty; 2009 Jun; 24(4):646-51. PubMed ID: 18534445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Mechanical accuracy of navigated minimally invasive total knee arthroplasty (MIS TKA).
    Biasca N; Wirth S; Bungartz M
    Knee; 2009 Jan; 16(1):22-9. PubMed ID: 19070495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.