147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16199468)
21. Psychometrics of Multiple Choice Questions with Non-Functioning Distracters: Implications to Medical Education.
Deepak KK; Al-Umran KU; AI-Sheikh MH; Dkoli BV; Al-Rubaish A
Indian J Physiol Pharmacol; 2015; 59(4):428-35. PubMed ID: 27530011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Rarely selected distractors in high stakes medical multiple-choice examinations and their recognition by item authors: a simulation and survey.
Rogausch A; Hofer R; Krebs R
BMC Med Educ; 2010 Nov; 10():85. PubMed ID: 21106066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Education techniques for lifelong learning: writing multiple-choice questions for continuing medical education activities and self-assessment modules.
Collins J
Radiographics; 2006; 26(2):543-51. PubMed ID: 16549616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Retention of basic science information by senior medical students.
Ling Y; Swanson DB; Holtzman K; Bucak SD
Acad Med; 2008 Oct; 83(10 Suppl):S82-5. PubMed ID: 18820508
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Is a picture worth a thousand words: an analysis of the difficulty and discrimination parameters of illustrated vs. text-alone vignettes in histology multiple choice questions.
Holland J; O'Sullivan R; Arnett R
BMC Med Educ; 2015 Oct; 15():184. PubMed ID: 26502882
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Item statistics derived from three-option versions of multiple-choice questions are usually as robust as four- or five-option versions: implications for exam design.
Loudon C; Macias-Muñoz A
Adv Physiol Educ; 2018 Dec; 42(4):565-575. PubMed ID: 30192185
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Comparing Item Performance on Three- Versus Four-Option Multiple Choice Questions in a Veterinary Toxicology Course.
Royal K; Dorman D
Vet Sci; 2018 Jun; 5(2):. PubMed ID: 29890727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. North American Veterinary Licensing Examination pacing study.
Subhiyah RG; Boyce JR
J Vet Med Educ; 2010; 37(4):377-82. PubMed ID: 21135405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. A, B, or C? A Quasi-experimental Multi-site Study Investigating Three Option Multiple Choice Questions.
Hartigan-Rogers JA; Redmond S; Cobbett S; Cifuentes K; Honan D; Richard E; Sheane V; VanTassell T
Int J Nurs Educ Scholarsh; 2019 Dec; 16(1):. PubMed ID: 31863697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Comparison between three option, four option and five option multiple choice question tests for quality parameters: A randomized study.
Vegada B; Shukla A; Khilnani A; Charan J; Desai C
Indian J Pharmacol; 2016; 48(5):571-575. PubMed ID: 27721545
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Beyond multiple-choice questions and essays: the need for a new way to assess clinical competence.
Elstein AS
Acad Med; 1993 Apr; 68(4):244-9. PubMed ID: 8466598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Do item-writing flaws reduce examinations psychometric quality?
Pais J; Silva A; Guimarães B; Povo A; Coelho E; Silva-Pereira F; Lourinho I; Ferreira MA; Severo M
BMC Res Notes; 2016 Aug; 9(1):399. PubMed ID: 27516160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. An investigation into the optimal number of distractors in single-best answer exams.
Kilgour JM; Tayyaba S
Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2016 Aug; 21(3):571-85. PubMed ID: 26597452
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. F-type testlets and the effects of feedback and case-specificity.
Baldwin P; Baldwin SG; Haist SA
Acad Med; 2011 Oct; 86(10 Suppl):S55-8; quiz S58. PubMed ID: 21955770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Evaluation of vignette-type examination items for testing medical physiology.
Carroll RG
Am J Physiol; 1993 Jun; 264(6 Pt 3):S11-5. PubMed ID: 8328552
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Assessment of medical knowledge: the pros and cons of using true/false multiple choice questions.
Chandratilake M; Davis M; Ponnamperuma G
Natl Med J India; 2011; 24(4):225-8. PubMed ID: 22208143
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Item development process and analysis of 50 case-based items for implementation on the Korean Nursing Licensing Examination.
Park IS; Suh YO; Park HS; Kang SY; Kim KS; Kim GH; Choi YH; Kim HJ
J Educ Eval Health Prof; 2017; 14():20. PubMed ID: 28900070
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Multiple true-false items: a comparison of scoring algorithms.
Lahner FM; Lörwald AC; Bauer D; Nouns ZM; Krebs R; Guttormsen S; Fischer MR; Huwendiek S
Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2018 Aug; 23(3):455-463. PubMed ID: 29189963
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Adding to the debate on the numbers of options for MCQs: the case for not being limited to MCQs with three, four or five options.
Tweed M
BMC Med Educ; 2019 Sep; 19(1):354. PubMed ID: 31521151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. An assessment of functioning and non-functioning distractors in multiple-choice questions: a descriptive analysis.
Tarrant M; Ware J; Mohammed AM
BMC Med Educ; 2009 Jul; 9():40. PubMed ID: 19580681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
