These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16199468)

  • 41. When Listening Is Better Than Reading: Performance Gains on Cardiac Auscultation Test Questions.
    Short K; Bucak SD; Rosenthal F; Raymond MR
    Acad Med; 2018 May; 93(5):781-785. PubMed ID: 28930764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. The effects of violating standard item writing principles on tests and students: the consequences of using flawed test items on achievement examinations in medical education.
    Downing SM
    Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2005; 10(2):133-43. PubMed ID: 16078098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Effect of changing multiple choice questions from "all of the above" to "select all that apply".
    Dell KA; DeVries DM
    Curr Pharm Teach Learn; 2024 Mar; 16(3):174-177. PubMed ID: 38218657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Characteristics and Implications of Diagnostic Justification Scores Based on the New Patient Note Format of the USMLE Step 2 CS Exam.
    Yudkowsky R; Park YS; Hyderi A; Bordage G
    Acad Med; 2015 Nov; 90(11 Suppl):S56-62. PubMed ID: 26505103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Analysis of MCQ and distractor use in a large first year Health Faculty Foundation Program: assessing the effects of changing from five to four options.
    Fozzard N; Pearson A; du Toit E; Naug H; Wen W; Peak IR
    BMC Med Educ; 2018 Nov; 18(1):252. PubMed ID: 30404624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Relationship between performance on the NBME Comprehensive Basic Sciences Self-Assessment and USMLE Step 1 for U.S. and Canadian medical school students.
    Morrison CA; Ross LP; Fogle T; Butler A; Miller J; Dillon GF
    Acad Med; 2010 Oct; 85(10 Suppl):S98-101. PubMed ID: 20881715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Competency-based classification of COMLEX-USA cognitive examination test items.
    Langenau E; Pugliano G; Roberts W
    J Am Osteopath Assoc; 2011 Jun; 111(6):396-402. PubMed ID: 21771926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. High time for a change: psychometric analysis of multiple-choice questions in nursing.
    Redmond SP; Hartigan-Rogers JA; Cobbett S
    Int J Nurs Educ Scholarsh; 2012 Nov; 9():. PubMed ID: 23192053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Calibrating the Medical Council of Canada's Qualifying Examination Part I using an integrated item response theory framework: a comparison of models and designs.
    De Champlain AF; Boulais AP; Dallas A
    J Educ Eval Health Prof; 2016; 13():6. PubMed ID: 26883811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Three Sources of Validation Evidence Needed to Evaluate the Quality of Generated Test Items for Medical Licensure.
    Gierl M; Swygert K; Matovinovic D; Kulesher A; Lai H
    Teach Learn Med; 2024; 36(1):72-82. PubMed ID: 36106359
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Quality assurance of item writing: during the introduction of multiple choice questions in medicine for high stakes examinations.
    Ware J; Vik T
    Med Teach; 2009 Mar; 31(3):238-43. PubMed ID: 18825568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Assessing the validity of the USMLE step 2 clinical knowledge examination through an evaluation of its clinical relevance.
    Cuddy MM; Dillon GF; Clauser BE; Holtzman KZ; Margolis MJ; McEllhenney SM; Swanson DB
    Acad Med; 2004 Oct; 79(10 Suppl):S43-5. PubMed ID: 15383386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. A validity study of the writing sample section of the medical college admission test.
    Hojat M; Erdmann JB; Veloski JJ; Nasca TJ; Callahan CA; Julian E; Peck J
    Acad Med; 2000 Oct; 75(10 Suppl):S25-7. PubMed ID: 11031164
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. The frequency of item writing flaws in multiple-choice questions used in high stakes nursing assessments.
    Tarrant M; Knierim A; Hayes SK; Ware J
    Nurse Educ Today; 2006 Dec; 26(8):662-71. PubMed ID: 17014932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Testing and evaluation: the present and future of the assessment of medical professionals.
    Haist SA; Butler AP; Paniagua MA
    Adv Physiol Educ; 2017 Mar; 41(1):149-153. PubMed ID: 28235753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Using the NBME self-assessments to project performance on USMLE Step 1 and Step 2: impact of test administration conditions.
    Sawhill A; Butler A; Ripkey D; Swanson DB; Subhiyah R; Thelman J; Walsh W; Holtzman KZ; Angelucci K
    Acad Med; 2004 Oct; 79(10 Suppl):S55-7. PubMed ID: 15383390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Relationship between assessment item format and item performance characteristics.
    Phipps SD; Brackbill ML
    Am J Pharm Educ; 2009 Dec; 73(8):146. PubMed ID: 20221339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Dual process theory and intermediate effect: are faculty and residents' performance on multiple-choice, licensing exam questions different?
    Dong T; Durning SJ; Artino AR; van der Vleuten C; Holmboe E; Lipner R; Schuwirth L
    Mil Med; 2015 Apr; 180(4 Suppl):92-6. PubMed ID: 25850134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Illustrated versus non-illustrated anatomical test items in anatomy course tests and German Medical Licensing examinations (M1).
    Bahlmann O
    GMS J Med Educ; 2018; 35(2):Doc25. PubMed ID: 29963615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Reliability of a 25-item low-stakes multiple-choice assessment of bronchoscopic knowledge.
    Quadrelli S; Davoudi M; Galíndez F; Colt HG
    Chest; 2009 Feb; 135(2):315-321. PubMed ID: 18849404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.