BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

201 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16199537)

  • 21. Comparative genomic hybridization-array analysis enhances the detection of aneuploidies and submicroscopic imbalances in spontaneous miscarriages.
    Schaeffer AJ; Chung J; Heretis K; Wong A; Ledbetter DH; Lese Martin C
    Am J Hum Genet; 2004 Jun; 74(6):1168-74. PubMed ID: 15127362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. ACOG Committee Opinion No. 446: array comparative genomic hybridization in prenatal diagnosis.
    Obstet Gynecol; 2009 Nov; 114(5):1161-1163. PubMed ID: 20168129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. [Results of 1043 prenatal cytogenetic studies: retrospective study in the context of applicability of interphase FISH in prenatal diagnosis]].
    Bocian E; Jakubów-Durska K; Mazurczak T
    Ginekol Pol; 2001 Jun; 72(6):449-55. PubMed ID: 11526742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. [Confirmation and analysis of 2 398 positive results of cell-free fetal DNA].
    Zhao JH; Dai P; Zhu RN; Shi PL; Meng JJ; Kong XD
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2020 Oct; 55(10):679-684. PubMed ID: 33120479
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. [Prenatal diagnosis for a women with a suspected birth history of Angelman syndrome].
    Guo C; Xiao J; Wang J; Yang L; Tang Y
    Zhonghua Yi Xue Yi Chuan Xue Za Zhi; 2015 Dec; 32(6):827-9. PubMed ID: 26663058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Chromosomal microarray versus karyotyping for prenatal diagnosis.
    Wapner RJ; Martin CL; Levy B; Ballif BC; Eng CM; Zachary JM; Savage M; Platt LD; Saltzman D; Grobman WA; Klugman S; Scholl T; Simpson JL; McCall K; Aggarwal VS; Bunke B; Nahum O; Patel A; Lamb AN; Thom EA; Beaudet AL; Ledbetter DH; Shaffer LG; Jackson L
    N Engl J Med; 2012 Dec; 367(23):2175-84. PubMed ID: 23215555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. [Application of whole-genome and high-resolution chromosome microarray analysis for the investigation of fetuses with ultrasound abnormalities].
    Zhang Y; Fu F; Li R; Xie G; Han J; Pan M; Zhen L; Yang X; Li D; Liao C
    Zhonghua Yi Xue Yi Chuan Xue Za Zhi; 2015 Apr; 32(2):169-74. PubMed ID: 25863078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Implementation of high resolution whole genome array CGH in the prenatal clinical setting: advantages, challenges, and review of the literature.
    Evangelidou P; Alexandrou A; Moutafi M; Ioannides M; Antoniou P; Koumbaris G; Kallikas I; Velissariou V; Sismani C; Patsalis PC
    Biomed Res Int; 2013; 2013():346762. PubMed ID: 23555083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Prenatal diagnosis of chromosomal abnormalities using array-based comparative genomic hybridization.
    Sahoo T; Cheung SW; Ward P; Darilek S; Patel A; del Gaudio D; Kang SH; Lalani SR; Li J; McAdoo S; Burke A; Shaw CA; Stankiewicz P; Chinault AC; Van den Veyver IB; Roa BB; Beaudet AL; Eng CM
    Genet Med; 2006 Nov; 8(11):719-27. PubMed ID: 17108764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Detection of low-level mosaicism by array CGH in routine diagnostic specimens.
    Ballif BC; Rorem EA; Sundin K; Lincicum M; Gaskin S; Coppinger J; Kashork CD; Shaffer LG; Bejjani BA
    Am J Med Genet A; 2006 Dec; 140(24):2757-67. PubMed ID: 17103431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Rapid prenatal diagnosis of trisomy 21 in 5049 consecutive uncultured amniotic fluid samples by fluorescence in situ hybridisation (FISH).
    Witters I; Devriendt K; Legius E; Matthijs G; Van Schoubroeck D; Van Assche FA; Fryns JP
    Prenat Diagn; 2002 Jan; 22(1):29-33. PubMed ID: 11810646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Application of a target array comparative genomic hybridization to prenatal diagnosis.
    Park JH; Woo JH; Shim SH; Yang SJ; Choi YM; Yang KS; Cha DH
    BMC Med Genet; 2010 Jun; 11():102. PubMed ID: 20576126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Validation of a Chromosomal Microarray for Prenatal Diagnosis Using a Prospective Cohort of Pregnancies with Increased Risk for Chromosome Abnormalities.
    Wright D; Carey L; Battersby S; Nguyen T; Clarke M; Nash B; Gulesserian E; Cross J; Darmanian A
    Genet Test Mol Biomarkers; 2016 Dec; 20(12):791-798. PubMed ID: 27690282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. [Application of multiplex quantitative fluorescent PCR with non-polymorphic loci in prenatal diagnosis].
    Zhu XY; Hu YL; Wang YP; Zhu HY; Li J; Zhu RF; Zhang Y; Wu X; Yang Y
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2008 Nov; 43(11):818-23. PubMed ID: 19087563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Whole-genome array CGH evaluation for replacing prenatal karyotyping in Hong Kong.
    Kan AS; Lau ET; Tang WF; Chan SS; Ding SC; Chan KY; Lee CP; Hui PW; Chung BH; Leung KY; Ma T; Leung WC; Tang MH
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(2):e87988. PubMed ID: 24505343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. A prospective study of the clinical utility of prenatal chromosomal microarray analysis in fetuses with ultrasound abnormalities and an exploration of a framework for reporting unclassified variants and risk factors.
    Brady PD; Delle Chiaie B; Christenhusz G; Dierickx K; Van Den Bogaert K; Menten B; Janssens S; Defoort P; Roets E; Sleurs E; Keymolen K; De Catte L; Deprest J; de Ravel T; Van Esch H; Fryns JP; Devriendt K; Vermeesch JR
    Genet Med; 2014 Jun; 16(6):469-76. PubMed ID: 24177055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. De novo 16p13.11 microdeletion identified by high-resolution array CGH in a fetus with increased nuchal translucency.
    Law LW; Lau TK; Fung TY; Leung TY; Wang CC; Choy KW
    BJOG; 2009 Jan; 116(2):339-43. PubMed ID: 19018765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Genomic profiling of plasma cell disorders in a clinical setting: integration of microarray and FISH, after CD138 selection of bone marrow.
    Berry NK; Bain NL; Enjeti AK; Rowlings P
    J Clin Pathol; 2014 Jan; 67(1):66-9. PubMed ID: 23969274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Analysis of tissue from products of conception and perinatal losses using QF-PCR and microarray: A three-year retrospective study resulting in an efficient protocol.
    Wou K; Hyun Y; Chitayat D; Vlasschaert M; Chong K; Wasim S; Keating S; Shannon P; Kolomietz E
    Eur J Med Genet; 2016 Aug; 59(8):417-24. PubMed ID: 27233578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Analysis of uncultured amniocytes by comparative genomic hybridization: a prospective prenatal study.
    Lapierre JM; Cacheux V; Luton D; Collot N; Oury JF; Aurias A; Tachdjian G
    Prenat Diagn; 2000 Feb; 20(2):123-31. PubMed ID: 10694684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.