These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1620050)

  • 1. A chamber and electrometer calibration factor as determined by each of the five AAPM accredited dosimetry calibration laboratories.
    Blackwell CR; McCullough EC
    Med Phys; 1992; 19(1):207-8. PubMed ID: 1620050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Ion chamber absorbed dose calibration coefficients, N(D,w), measured at ADCLs: distribution analysis and stability.
    Muir BR
    Med Phys; 2015 Apr; 42(4):1546-54. PubMed ID: 25832045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Calculated absorbed-dose ratios, TG51/TG21, for most widely used cylindrical and parallel-plate ion chambers over a range of photon and electron energies.
    Tailor RC; Hanson WF
    Med Phys; 2002 Jul; 29(7):1464-72. PubMed ID: 12148727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Assessment of a self-inspection method and reporting measured electrometer correction factors for reference-class electrometers in radiotherapy.
    Kawashima M; Varnava M; Ozawa S; Okada H; Higuchi H; Hoshino Y; Tashiro M
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2023 Aug; 24(8):e14082. PubMed ID: 37357597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The US radiation dosimetry standards for 60Co therapy level beams, and the transfer to the AAPM accredited dosimetry calibration laboratories.
    Minniti R; Chen-Mayer H; Seltzer SM; Huq MS; Bryson L; Slowey T; Micka JA; DeWerd LA; Wells N; Hanson WF; Ibbott GS;
    Med Phys; 2006 Apr; 33(4):1074-7. PubMed ID: 16696484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Evaluation of relative electrometer calibration factor with user beam.].
    Hatanaka S; Fujisaki T; Myojoyama A; Hiraoka T; Saitoh H
    Igaku Butsuri; 2008; 27(3):129-35. PubMed ID: 18367823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Long-term use of an isotope check source for verification of ion chamber calibration.
    Barish RJ; Lerch IA
    Med Phys; 1992; 19(1):203-5. PubMed ID: 1620049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The calibration and use of plane-parallel ionization chambers for dosimetry of electron beams: an extension of the 1983 AAPM protocol report of AAPM Radiation Therapy Committee Task Group No. 39.
    Almond PR; Attix FH; Humphries LJ; Kubo H; Nath R; Goetsch S; Rogers DW
    Med Phys; 1994 Aug; 21(8):1251-60. PubMed ID: 7799867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A round-robin gamma stereotactic radiosurgery dosimetry interinstitution comparison of calibration protocols.
    Drzymala RE; Alvarez PE; Bednarz G; Bourland JD; DeWerd LA; Ma L; Meltsner SG; Neyman G; Novotny J; Petti PL; Rivard MJ; Shiu AS; Goetsch SJ
    Med Phys; 2015 Nov; 42(11):6745-56. PubMed ID: 26520764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A proposal for the calibration of plane-parallel ion chambers by accredited dosimetry calibration laboratories.
    Attix FH
    Med Phys; 1990; 17(5):931-3. PubMed ID: 2233583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Calibration instrumentation used by the AAPM Radiological Physics Center.
    Grant W; Cundiff J; Hanson W; Gagnon W; Shalek R
    Med Phys; 1976 SEP-OCT; 3(5):353-4. PubMed ID: 979927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A review of the reliability of chamber factors used clinically in the United States (1968--1976).
    Hanson WF; Grant W; Kennedy P; Cundiff JH; Gagnon WF; Berkley LW; Shalek RJ
    Med Phys; 1978; 5(6):552-5. PubMed ID: 104138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Reference dosimetry in clinical high-energy electron beams: comparison of the AAPM TG-51 and AAPM TG-21 dosimetry protocols.
    Saiful Huq M; Song H; Andreo P; Houser CJ
    Med Phys; 2001 Oct; 28(10):2077-87. PubMed ID: 11695769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Electrometer offset current due to scattered radiation.
    Wegener S; Sauer OA
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2018 Nov; 19(6):274-281. PubMed ID: 30298980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Verification of Response Uncertainty in Electrometers through Cross-Comparison with a Novel Current Source: A Comparative Study with Guidelines for Electrometers Used in Radiation Therapy Dosimeters].
    Tsuno H; Matsubayashi F; Sasaki K; Sakai T; Matsumoto K; Takeuchi K
    Igaku Butsuri; 2024; 44(2):21-28. PubMed ID: 38945879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Uncertainty of calibrations at the accredited dosimetry calibration laboratories.
    Ibbott GS; Attix FH; Slowey TW; Fontenla DP; Rozenfeld M
    Med Phys; 1997 Aug; 24(8):1249-54. PubMed ID: 9284248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Dosimetric calibration of CT pencil chamber in cobalt beams].
    Li Y; Wang J; Wang Y
    Zhongguo Yi Liao Qi Xie Za Zhi; 2014 Jan; 38(1):76-8. PubMed ID: 24839859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Calorimetric determination of the cavity-gas calibration factor Ngas.
    Schulz RJ; Weinhous MS
    Med Phys; 1985; 12(2):166-8. PubMed ID: 4000071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Procedures for establishing and maintaining consistent air-kerma strength standards for low-energy, photon-emitting brachytherapy sources: recommendations of the Calibration Laboratory Accreditation Subcommittee of the American Association of Physicists in Medicine.
    DeWerd LA; Huq MS; Das IJ; Ibbott GS; Hanson WF; Slowey TW; Williamson JF; Coursey BM;
    Med Phys; 2004 Mar; 31(3):675-81. PubMed ID: 15070265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Development of a new ionisation chamber, for HP(10) measurement, using Monte-Carlo simulation and experimental methods.
    Silva H; Cardoso J; Oliveira C
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2011 Mar; 144(1-4):168-72. PubMed ID: 21208934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.