These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
223 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16200693)
41. The Supreme Court and the Partial-birth Abortion Ban Act of 2003: a political procedure replaces woman-centered care. Poppema ST MedGenMed; 2007; 9(3):41; author reply 41. PubMed ID: 18159625 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
42. The Supreme Court and the Partial-birth Abortion Ban Act of 2003: a political procedure replaces woman-centered care. Gartner EC MedGenMed; 2007; 9(3):41; author reply 41. PubMed ID: 18159623 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
43. Minors as medical decision makers: the pretextual reasoning of the court in the abortion cases. Ehrlich JS Mich J Gend Law; 2000; 7(1):65-106. PubMed ID: 12715809 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
44. What happens if Roe is overruled? Extraterritorial regulation of abortion by the states. Bradford CS Ariz Law Rev; 1993; 35(1):87-171. PubMed ID: 12645556 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
46. From arguments to Supreme Court opinions in Planned Parenthood v. Casey. Kassop N PS (Wash DC); 1993 Mar; 26(1):53-8. PubMed ID: 12085874 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
47. What Lawrence v. Texas says about the history and future of reproductive rights. Dailard C Fordham Urban Law J; 2004 Mar; 31(3):717-23. PubMed ID: 16700117 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
48. Restrictions on women's right to abortion: informed consent, spousal consent, and record keeping provisions. Karg B Womens Rights Law Report; 1978; 5(1):35-51. PubMed ID: 11665035 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
49. State constitutional privacy rights post Webster--broader protection against abortion restrictions? Ezzard MM Denver Univ Law Rev; 1990; 67(3):401-19. PubMed ID: 15999439 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
50. State Abortion Restrictions and the New Supreme Court: Women's Access to Reproductive Health Services. Reingold RB; Gostin LO JAMA; 2019 Jul; 322(1):21-22. PubMed ID: 31166573 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
51. Change of venue: abortion regulation in the states. Rogers EH Tex J Women Law; 1994; 3(1):123-33. PubMed ID: 12645607 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
52. Whither the family and family privacy? Jones TR; Peterman L Tex Rev Law Polit; 1999; 4(1):193-236. PubMed ID: 15706723 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
53. Must we really make the case for abortion rights all over again? Forde C Conscience; 2005; 26(1):22-3. PubMed ID: 16639810 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
54. Whole Woman's Health v. Hellerstedt. Harv Law Rev; 2016 Nov; 130(1):397-406. PubMed ID: 28117562 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
55. Implications of the Federal Abortion Ban for Women's Health in the United States. Weitz TA; Yanow S Reprod Health Matters; 2008 May; 16(31 Suppl):99-107. PubMed ID: 18772090 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. The argument that never ends. Simon R US News World Rep; 2003 Jan; 134(2):24. PubMed ID: 12561696 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
57. The women of Roe v. Wade. Glendon MA Hum Life Rev; 2003; 29(3):31-8. PubMed ID: 14964200 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
58. The Supreme Court and the Partial-birth Abortion Ban Act of 2003: a political procedure replaces woman-centered care. Nordholm S MedGenMed; 2007; 9(3):41; author reply 41. PubMed ID: 18159624 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
59. New York v. Sullivan: shhh ... don't say the "a" word! Another outcome-oriented abortion decision. Kendall CC John Marshall Law Rev; 1990; 23(4):753-70. PubMed ID: 16622962 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
60. The rhetoric of disrespect: uncovering the faulty premises infecting reproductive rights. Reilly EA Am Univ J Gend Soc Policy Law; 1996; 5(1):147-205. PubMed ID: 16594108 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]