These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

195 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16200699)

  • 1. At what cost?: an argument against mandatory AZT treatment of HIV-positive pregnant women.
    Halem SC
    Harv Civ Rights-Civil Lib Law Rev; 1997; 32(2):492-528. PubMed ID: 16200699
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Mandatory HIV testing and treating of child-bearing women: an unnatural, illegal, and unsound approach.
    McGovern TM
    Columbia Human Rights Law Rev; 1997; 28(3):469-99. PubMed ID: 16437777
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Is mama a criminal? An analysis of potential criminal liability of HIV-infected pregnant women in the context of mandated drug therapy.
    Ayers L
    Drake Law Rev; 2002; 50(2):293-314. PubMed ID: 12680390
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The law and ACTG protocol 076: do the slings and arrows of mandatory HIV testing penetrate a woman's right to privacy.
    Goldring DS
    Linc Law Rev; 1999; 25/26():1-23. PubMed ID: 15929237
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The case against mandatory HIV testing of pregnant women: the legal and public policy implications.
    McMillion E
    Duke J Gend Law Policy; 1998; 5(1):227-44. PubMed ID: 11979602
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The free exercise rights of pregnant women who refuse medical treatment.
    Cherry AL
    Tenn Law Rev; 2002; 69(3):563-622. PubMed ID: 15378820
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Perinatal HIV transmission: a children's human rights perspective.
    Hodge JG; Parini MJ
    Child Leg Rights J; 1998; 18(2):6-19. PubMed ID: 16437776
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Control of childbearing by HIV-positive women: some responses to emerging legal policies.
    Sangree S
    Buffalo Law Rev; 1993; 41(2):309-449. PubMed ID: 11659735
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Mandatory HIV testing: an Orwellian proposition.
    Lagitch KE
    St Johns Law Rev; 1998; 72(1):103-39. PubMed ID: 16184658
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. How far can a state go to protect a fetus? The Rebecca Corneau story and the case for requiring Massachusetts to follow the U.S. Constitution.
    Bower HR
    Gold Gate Univ Law Rev; 2001; 31(1):123-54. PubMed ID: 12666688
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Mandatory newborn HIV testing.
    Honig J; Jurgrau A
    J Nurs Law; 1999; 6(1):33-7. PubMed ID: 15508225
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Mandatory testing of pregnant women: a strategy for challenging the law.
    Cooper EB
    AIDS Policy Law; 1996 Aug; Bonus Report():1-2. PubMed ID: 11660351
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Attitudes of HIV-positive women toward zidovudine therapy during pregnancy.
    J Adv Nurs; 2002 Sep; 39(5):410-1. PubMed ID: 12229862
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. "For their own good": civil commitment of alcohol and drug-dependent pregnant women.
    Chavkin DF
    S D Law Rev; 1992; 37(2):224-88. PubMed ID: 11657122
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Mandatory HIV testing of pregnant women: public health policy considerations and alternatives.
    Nicholson E
    Duke J Gend Law Policy; 2002; 9():175-91. PubMed ID: 14986669
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Mandatory HIV testing in pregnancy: is there ever a time?
    Armstrong R
    Dev World Bioeth; 2008 Apr; 8(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 18315721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Compulsory abortion: next challenge to liberated women?
    Swan GS
    Ohio North Univ Law Rev; 1975; 3(1):152-75. PubMed ID: 11663633
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Not in my womb: compelled prenatal genetic testing.
    Roop WE
    Hastings Constit Law Q; 2000; 27(2):397-421. PubMed ID: 12449963
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Women's rights versus the protection of fetuses.
    Warren MA
    Midwest Med Ethics; 1991; 7(1):1, 3-7. PubMed ID: 16145788
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Senate favors promoting voluntary tests for pregnant women.
    AIDS Policy Law; 1995 Aug; 10(15):12. PubMed ID: 11362736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.