BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16201053)

  • 1. The changing association between prenatal participation in WIC and birth outcomes in New York City.
    Joyce T; Gibson D; Colman S
    J Policy Anal Manage; 2005; 24(4):661-85. PubMed ID: 16201053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The changing association between prenatal participation in WIC and birth outcomes in New York City: what does it mean?
    Bitler MP; Currie J
    J Policy Anal Manage; 2005; 24(4):687-90. PubMed ID: 16201054
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Assisted reproductive technology surveillance--United States, 2011.
    Sunderam S; Kissin DM; Crawford SB; Folger SG; Jamieson DJ; Barfield WD;
    MMWR Surveill Summ; 2014 Nov; 63(10):1-28. PubMed ID: 25412164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Prenatal WIC participation can reduce low birth weight and newborn medical costs: a cost-benefit analysis of WIC participation in North Carolina.
    Buescher PA; Larson LC; Nelson MD; Lenihan AJ
    J Am Diet Assoc; 1993 Feb; 93(2):163-6. PubMed ID: 8423280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Reassessing the WIC effect: evidence from the Pregnancy Nutrition Surveillance System.
    Joyce T; Racine A; Yunzal-Butler C
    J Policy Anal Manage; 2008; 27(2):277-303. PubMed ID: 18401924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Impact of augmented prenatal care on birth outcomes of Medicaid recipients in New York City.
    Joyce T
    J Health Econ; 1999 Jan; 18(1):31-67. PubMed ID: 10338819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Length of prenatal participation in WIC and risk of delivering a small for gestational age infant: Florida, 1996-2004.
    Gueorguieva R; Morse SB; Roth J
    Matern Child Health J; 2009 Jul; 13(4):479-88. PubMed ID: 18661219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Does WIC work? The effects of WIC on pregnancy and birth outcomes.
    Bitler MP; Currie J
    J Policy Anal Manage; 2005; 24(1):73-91. PubMed ID: 15584177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The Impact of WIC on Birth Outcomes: New Evidence from South Carolina.
    Sonchak L
    Matern Child Health J; 2016 Jul; 20(7):1518-25. PubMed ID: 26976280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Assisted reproductive technology surveillance -- United States, 2010.
    Sunderam S; Kissin DM; Crawford S; Anderson JE; Folger SG; Jamieson DJ; Barfield WD;
    MMWR Surveill Summ; 2013 Dec; 62(9):1-24. PubMed ID: 24304902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A comparative analysis of effects of early versus late prenatal WIC participation on birth weight: NYS, 1995.
    Lazariu-Bauer V; Stratton H; Pruzek R; Woelfel ML
    Matern Child Health J; 2004 Jun; 8(2):77-86. PubMed ID: 15198175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effect of food supplementation (WIC) during pregnancy on birth weight.
    Metcoff J; Costiloe P; Crosby WM; Dutta S; Sandstead HH; Milne D; Bodwell CE; Majors SH
    Am J Clin Nutr; 1985 May; 41(5):933-47. PubMed ID: 3993611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Assisted Reproductive Technology Surveillance - 
United States, 2013.
    Sunderam S; Kissin DM; Crawford SB; Folger SG; Jamieson DJ; Warner L; Barfield WD;
    MMWR Surveill Summ; 2015 Dec; 64(11):1-25. PubMed ID: 26633040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Assisted Reproductive Technology Surveillance — United States, 2012.
    Sunderam S; Kissin DM; Crawford SB; Folger SG; Jamieson DJ; Warner L; Barfield WD;
    MMWR Surveill Summ; 2015 Aug; 64(6):1-29. PubMed ID: 26270152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Assisted reproductive technology surveillance--United States, 2009.
    Sunderam S; Kissin DM; Flowers L; Anderson JE; Folger SG; Jamieson DJ; Barfield WD;
    MMWR Surveill Summ; 2012 Nov; 61(7):1-23. PubMed ID: 23114281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Trends in twin birth outcomes and prenatal care utilization in the United States, 1981-1997.
    Kogan MD; Alexander GR; Kotelchuck M; MacDorman MF; Buekens P; Martin JA; Papiernik E
    JAMA; 2000 Jul; 284(3):335-41. PubMed ID: 10891965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. WIC prenatal participation and its relationship to newborn Medicaid costs in Missouri: a cost/benefit analysis.
    Schramm WF
    Am J Public Health; 1985 Aug; 75(8):851-7. PubMed ID: 3927756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Prenatal WIC Is Associated with Increased Birth Weight of Infants Born in the United States with Immigrant Mothers.
    Ettinger de Cuba S; Mbamalu M; Bovell-Ammon A; Black MM; Cutts DB; Lê-Scherban F; Coleman SM; Ochoa ER; Heeren TC; Poblacion A; Sandel M; Bruce C; Rateau LJ; Frank DA
    J Acad Nutr Diet; 2022 Aug; 122(8):1514-1524.e4. PubMed ID: 35151905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. First- and second-trimester WIC participation is associated with lower rates of breastfeeding and early introduction of cow's milk during infancy.
    Ziol-Guest KM; Hernandez DC
    J Am Diet Assoc; 2010 May; 110(5):702-9. PubMed ID: 20430131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A statewide Medicaid enhanced prenatal care program: impact on birth outcomes.
    Roman L; Raffo JE; Zhu Q; Meghea CI
    JAMA Pediatr; 2014 Mar; 168(3):220-7. PubMed ID: 24394980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.