These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

107 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16201490)

  • 21. Control charts 101: a guide to health care applications.
    Amin SG
    Qual Manag Health Care; 2001; 9(3):1-27. PubMed ID: 11372500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Use and interpretation of statistical quality control charts.
    Benneyan JC
    Int J Qual Health Care; 1998 Feb; 10(1):69-73. PubMed ID: 10030790
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Population control charts for population data.
    Hansen JP
    J Healthc Qual; 2007; 29(1):29-36. PubMed ID: 17518030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. On the applications of statistical process control in health care.
    Adeoti OA
    Niger J Med; 2009; 18(1):25-8. PubMed ID: 19485142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Why traditional statistical process control charts for attribute data should be viewed alongside an xmr-chart.
    Mohammed MA; Worthington P
    BMJ Qual Saf; 2013 Mar; 22(3):263-9. PubMed ID: 23104897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The influence of graphic display format on the interpretations of quantitative risk information among adults with lower education and literacy: a randomized experimental study.
    McCaffery KJ; Dixon A; Hayen A; Jansen J; Smith S; Simpson JM
    Med Decis Making; 2012; 32(4):532-44. PubMed ID: 22074912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Optimal reporting of health care process measures: inferential statistics as help or hindrance?
    Allison JJ; Calhoun JW; Wall TC; Spettell CM; Fargason CA; Weissman NW; Kiefe CI
    Manag Care Q; 2000; 8(4):1-10. PubMed ID: 11155907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Using standard desk-top tools to monitor medical error rates.
    Carroll CA; Cox KS; Santos SR; Simon SD
    Semin Nurse Manag; 2002 Jun; 10(2):95-9. PubMed ID: 12092273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Impact of a standard medication chart on prescribing errors: a before-and-after audit.
    Coombes ID; Stowasser DA; Reid C; Mitchell CA
    Qual Saf Health Care; 2009 Dec; 18(6):478-85. PubMed ID: 19955461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Sequential monitoring of hospital adverse events when control charts fail: the example of fall injuries in hospitals.
    Barker A; Morton A; Gatton M; Tong E; Clements A
    Qual Saf Health Care; 2009 Dec; 18(6):473-7. PubMed ID: 19955460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Application of variables control charts to risk-adjusted time-ordered healthcare data.
    Hart MK; Robertson JW; Hart RF; Lee KY
    Qual Manag Health Care; 2004; 13(2):99-119. PubMed ID: 15127690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. [Control charts--a useful graphical tool for the analysis of process variation over time].
    Andersen SE; Kjaergaard J
    Ugeskr Laeger; 2009 Mar; 171(11):895-8. PubMed ID: 19278613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Understanding variation in cardiopulmonary bypass: Statistical Process Control Theory.
    Groom R; Likosky DS; Rutberg H
    J Extra Corpor Technol; 2004 Sep; 36(3):224-30. PubMed ID: 15559738
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The art and science of chart review.
    Allison JJ; Wall TC; Spettell CM; Calhoun J; Fargason CA; Kobylinski RW; Farmer R; Kiefe C
    Jt Comm J Qual Improv; 2000 Mar; 26(3):115-36. PubMed ID: 10709146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Using Statistical Process Control to Drive Improvement in Neonatal Care: A Practical Introduction to Control Charts.
    Gupta M; Kaplan HC
    Clin Perinatol; 2017 Sep; 44(3):627-644. PubMed ID: 28802343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Response to letter to the editor from Dr Rahman Shiri: The challenging topic of suicide across occupational groups.
    Niedhammer I; Milner A; Witt K; Klingelschmidt J; Khireddine-Medouni I; Alexopoulos EC; Toivanen S; Chastang JF; LaMontagne AD
    Scand J Work Environ Health; 2018 Jan; 44(1):108-110. PubMed ID: 29218357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Perspective: comparing two-sample tests and control charts.
    Finison LJ; Finison KS
    J Healthc Qual; 1994; 16(4):31-4. PubMed ID: 10135293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Statistical process control charts for monitoring military injuries.
    Schuh A; Canham-Chervak M; Jones BH
    Inj Prev; 2017 Dec; 23(6):416-422. PubMed ID: 28232403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. [Comparative quality measurements part 3: funnel plots].
    Kottner J; Lahmann N
    Pflege; 2014 Feb; 27(1):41-9. PubMed ID: 24571847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Dynamic probability control limits for risk-adjusted Bernoulli CUSUM charts.
    Zhang X; Woodall WH
    Stat Med; 2015 Nov; 34(25):3336-48. PubMed ID: 26037959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.