These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16201900)

  • 1. Educational intervention together with an on-line quality control program achieve recommended analytical goals for bedside blood glucose monitoring in a 1200-bed university hospital.
    Sánchez-Margalet V; Rodriguez-Oliva M; Sánchez-Pozo C; Fernández-Gallardo MF; Goberna R
    Clin Chem Lab Med; 2005; 43(8):876-9. PubMed ID: 16201900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Performance evaluation of blood glucose monitoring devices.
    Chen ET; Nichols JH; Duh SH; Hortin G
    Diabetes Technol Ther; 2003; 5(5):749-68. PubMed ID: 14633341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Interinstitutional comparison of bedside blood glucose monitoring program characteristics, accuracy performance, and quality control documentation: a College of American Pathologists Q-Probes study of bedside blood glucose monitoring performed in 226 small hospitals.
    Novis DA; Jones BA
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1998 Jun; 122(6):495-502. PubMed ID: 9625416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Plasma-equivalent glucose at the point-of-care: evaluation of Roche Accu-Chek Inform and Abbott Precision PCx glucose meters.
    Ghys T; Goedhuys W; Spincemaille K; Gorus F; Gerlo E
    Clin Chim Acta; 2007; 386(1-2):63-8. PubMed ID: 17727831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Post-analytical errors with portable glucose meters in the hospital setting.
    Carraro P; Plebani M
    Clin Chim Acta; 2009 Jun; 404(1):65-7. PubMed ID: 19298797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Large-scale performance evaluation of Accu-Chek inform II point-of-care glucose meters.
    Jeong TD; Cho EJ; Ko DH; Lee W; Chun S; Hong KS; Min WK
    Scand J Clin Lab Invest; 2016 Dec; 76(8):657-663. PubMed ID: 27739331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. SKML-Quality Mark for point-of-care test (POCT) glucose meters and glucose meters for home-use.
    Jansen RT; Slingerland RJ
    Clin Chem Lab Med; 2010 Jul; 48(7):1021-7. PubMed ID: 20459353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluation of a glucose meter against analytical quality specifications for hospital use.
    Singh Dhatt G; Agarwal M; Bishawi B
    Clin Chim Acta; 2004 May; 343(1-2):217-21. PubMed ID: 15115699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Quality control of "one touch" II blood glucose meters used by nurses in clinical departments.
    van 't Sant P; Hovenier JT; Kreutzer HJ
    Eur J Clin Chem Clin Biochem; 1994 Sep; 32(9):723-5. PubMed ID: 7865630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation of four portable self-monitoring blood glucose meters.
    Lippi G; Salvagno GL; Guidi GC; Negri M; Rizzotti P
    Ann Clin Biochem; 2006 Sep; 43(Pt 5):408-13. PubMed ID: 17022884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Analytical performance of glucometers used for routine glucose self-monitoring of diabetic patients.
    Solnica B; Naskalski JW; Sieradzki J
    Clin Chim Acta; 2003 May; 331(1-2):29-35. PubMed ID: 12691861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Bedside glucose monitoring quality control practices. A College of American Pathologists Q-Probes study of program quality control documentation, program characteristics, and accuracy performance in 544 institutions.
    Jones BA; Howanitz PJ
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1996 Apr; 120(4):339-45. PubMed ID: 8619744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Bedside glucose monitoring. Comparison of performance as studied by the College of American Pathologists Q-Probes program.
    Howanitz PJ; Jones BA
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1996 Apr; 120(4):333-8. PubMed ID: 8619743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Validation of home blood glucose meters with respect to clinical and analytical approaches.
    Brunner GA; Ellmerer M; Sendlhofer G; Wutte A; Trajanoski Z; Schaupp L; Quehenberger F; Wach P; Krejs GJ; Pieber TR
    Diabetes Care; 1998 Apr; 21(4):585-90. PubMed ID: 9571347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluation of the quality of bedside monitoring of the blood glucose level in a teaching hospital.
    Ting C; Nanji AA
    CMAJ; 1988 Jan; 138(1):23-6. PubMed ID: 3275478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Process improvement for bedside capillary glucose testing in a large academic medical center: the impact of new technology on point-of-care testing.
    Lewandrowski E; Mac Millan D; Misiano D; Tochka L; Lewandrowski K
    Clin Chim Acta; 2001 May; 307(1-2):175-9. PubMed ID: 11369354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A hospital-wide blind control program for bedside glucose meters.
    Bain OF; Brown KD; Sacher RA; McPherson RA
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1989 Dec; 113(12):1370-5. PubMed ID: 2589948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Evaluation of Optium Xceed (Abbott) and One Touch Ultra (Lifescan) glucose meters].
    Coyne S; Lacour B; Hennequin-Le Meur C
    Ann Biol Clin (Paris); 2008; 66(3):249-54. PubMed ID: 18558561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Critical evaluation of connectivity-based point of care testing systems of glucose in a hospital environment.
    Floré KM; Fiers T; Delanghe JR
    Clin Chem Lab Med; 2008; 46(12):1763-8. PubMed ID: 19055453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A model for managing and monitoring the quality of glucometers used in a high-volume clinical setting.
    Aykal G; Yegin A; Tekeli Ö; Yilmaz N
    Biochem Med (Zagreb); 2016; 26(2):202-9. PubMed ID: 27346965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.