These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

118 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16201901)

  • 1. The reliability of calculated laboratory results.
    Coskun A
    Clin Chem Lab Med; 2005; 43(8):880-2. PubMed ID: 16201901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Modified Levey-Jennings charts for calculated laboratory tests.
    Coskun A
    Clin Chem Lab Med; 2006; 44(4):387-90. PubMed ID: 16599829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Westgard multirule for calculated laboratory tests.
    Coskun A
    Clin Chem Lab Med; 2006; 44(10):1183-7. PubMed ID: 17032128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Internal quality control system for non-stationary, non-ergodic analytical processes based upon exponentially weighted estimation of process means and process standard deviation.
    Jansen RT; Laeven M; Kardol W
    Clin Chem Lab Med; 2002 Jun; 40(6):616-24. PubMed ID: 12211659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. National survey on the pre-analytical variability in a representative cohort of Italian laboratories.
    Lippi G; Montagnana M; Giavarina D; ; ;
    Clin Chem Lab Med; 2006; 44(12):1491-4. PubMed ID: 17163828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Laboratory quality control: using patient data to assess analytical performance.
    Kazmierczak SC
    Clin Chem Lab Med; 2003 May; 41(5):617-27. PubMed ID: 12812257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Quality control of reactive oxygen species measurement by luminol-dependent chemiluminescence assay.
    Kobayashi H; Gil-Guzman E; Mahran AM; Rakesh ; Nelson DR; Thomas AJ; Agarwa A
    J Androl; 2001; 22(4):568-74. PubMed ID: 11451353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Analytical uncertainty--how wrong can a laboratory result be?].
    Bolann BJ; Stølsnes B
    Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 1999 Dec; 119(30):4472-5. PubMed ID: 10827487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluation of the performance of 57 Japanese participating laboratories by two types of z-scores in proficiency test for the quantification of pesticide residues in brown rice.
    Otake T; Yarita T; Aoyagi Y; Numata M; Takatsu A
    Anal Bioanal Chem; 2014 Nov; 406(28):7337-44. PubMed ID: 25258285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [The Reliability of Measurement Methods for Medical Examinations and Health Screening].
    Hosogaya S
    Rinsho Byori; 2016 Mar; 64(3):278-83. PubMed ID: 27363220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Allowable limits of analytical error which can guarantee the reliability of reference intervals for interpretation of clinical laboratory data].
    Hosogaya S; Ozaki Y
    Rinsho Byori; 2008 Jul; 56(7):617-21. PubMed ID: 18709995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Standardization of clinical laboratory data in Japan by the JAMT and JCCLS].
    Hosogaya S
    Rinsho Byori; 2009 Jun; 57(6):579-83. PubMed ID: 19621792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The quality of the extra-analytical phase of laboratory practice in some developing European countries and Mexico - a multicentric study.
    Simundic AM; Bilic-Zulle L; Nikolac N; Supak-Smolcic V; Honovic L; Avram S; Beregovaja E; Dobreanu M; Guimaraes JT; Kovacs GL; Singh NM; Sierra-Amor RI; Sypniewska G; Zima T
    Clin Chem Lab Med; 2011 Feb; 49(2):215-28. PubMed ID: 21118049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Impact of quality control accepted inter-laboratory variations on calculated Fibrotest/Actitest scores for the non-invasive biochemical assessment of liver fibrosis.
    Gressner OA; Beer N; Jodlowski A; Gressner AM
    Clin Chim Acta; 2009 Nov; 409(1-2):90-5. PubMed ID: 19748500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of several point-of-care testing (POCT) glucometers with an established laboratory procedure for the diagnosis of type 2 diabetes using the discordance rate. A new statistical approach.
    Püntmann I; Wosniok W; Haeckel R
    Clin Chem Lab Med; 2003 Jun; 41(6):809-20. PubMed ID: 12880146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Verification/validation of the performances of analytical method].
    Vassault A; Hulin A; Chapuzet E; Arnaud J; Giroud C;
    Ann Biol Clin (Paris); 2010 Dec; 68 Spec No 1():247-94. PubMed ID: 21613021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Discordance rate, a new concept for combining diagnostic decisions with analytical performance characteristics. 1. Application in method or sample system comparisons and in defining decision limits.
    Haeckel R; Wosniok W; Puentmann I
    Clin Chem Lab Med; 2003 Mar; 41(3):347-55. PubMed ID: 12705345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Everyday quality control at clinical-biochemical laboratories using chi square test].
    Balakhovskiĭ IS; Lots AP
    Klin Lab Diagn; 2001; (5):50-3. PubMed ID: 11507888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Quality in the molecular microbiology laboratory.
    Wallace PS; MacKay WG
    Methods Mol Biol; 2013; 943():49-79. PubMed ID: 23104281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Concentration-dependent profiles for describing the scatter of results of interlaboratory surveys.
    Geilenkeuser WJ; Röhle G
    Eur J Clin Chem Clin Biochem; 1994 May; 32(5):369-75. PubMed ID: 8086521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.