These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16202097)

  • 1. Pre-reproductive isolation as a consequence of allopatric differentiation between populations of Drosophila melanogaster.
    Haerty W; Lesbats M; Capy P
    Mol Ecol; 2005 Oct; 14(12):3801-7. PubMed ID: 16202097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Reproductive isolation in natural populations of Drosophila melanogaster from Brazzaville (Congo).
    Haerty W; Jallon JM; Rouault J; Bazin C; Capy P
    Genetica; 2002 Nov; 116(2-3):215-24. PubMed ID: 12555780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Population structure in African Drosophila melanogaster revealed by microsatellite analysis.
    Dieringer D; Nolte V; Schlötterer C
    Mol Ecol; 2005 Feb; 14(2):563-73. PubMed ID: 15660946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Adaptation to desiccation fails to generate pre- and postmating isolation in replicate Drosophila melanogaster laboratory populations.
    Kwan L; Rundle HD
    Evolution; 2010 Mar; 64(3):710-23. PubMed ID: 19817849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Genetic differentiation between American and European Drosophila melanogaster populations could be attributed to admixture of African alleles.
    Caracristi G; Schlötterer C
    Mol Biol Evol; 2003 May; 20(5):792-9. PubMed ID: 12679536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. No evidence that experimental manipulation of sexual conflict drives premating reproductive isolation in Drosophila melanogaster.
    Wigby S; Chapman T
    J Evol Biol; 2006 Jul; 19(4):1033-9. PubMed ID: 16780504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Existence of a pattern of reproductive character displacement in Homobasidiomycota but not in Ascomycota.
    Le Gac M; Giraud T
    J Evol Biol; 2008 May; 21(3):761-72. PubMed ID: 18312316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Host-related genetic differentiation in the anther smut fungus Microbotryum violaceum in sympatric, parapatric and allopatric populations of two host species Silene latifolia and S. dioica.
    van Putten WF; Biere A; van Damme JM
    J Evol Biol; 2005 Jan; 18(1):203-12. PubMed ID: 15669977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. An analysis of genetic differentiation among assortatively mating Drosophila melanogaster in Zimbabwe.
    Kauer MO; Schlötterer C
    J Evol Biol; 2004 May; 17(3):493-500. PubMed ID: 15149392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Postmating-prezygotic isolation is not an important source of selection for reinforcement within and between species in Drosophila pseudoobscura and D. persimilis.
    Lorch PD; Servedio MR
    Evolution; 2005 May; 59(5):1039-45. PubMed ID: 16136803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A population genomic analysis of species boundaries: neutral processes, adaptive divergence and introgression between two hybridizing plant species.
    Minder AM; Widmer A
    Mol Ecol; 2008 Mar; 17(6):1552-63. PubMed ID: 18321255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Microspatial structure of Drosophila melanogaster populations in Brazzaville: evidence of natural selection acting on morphometrical traits.
    Haerty W; Gibert P; Capy P; Moreteau B; David JR
    Heredity (Edinb); 2003 Nov; 91(5):440-7. PubMed ID: 14576736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A biogeographic genetic approach for testing the role of reinforcement: the case of Drosophila pseudoobscura and D. persimilis.
    Kulathinal RJ; Singh RS
    Evolution; 2000 Feb; 54(1):210-7. PubMed ID: 10937197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Nonneutral admixture of immigrant genotypes in African Drosophila melanogaster populations from Zimbabwe.
    Kauer M; Dieringer D; Schlötterer C
    Mol Biol Evol; 2003 Aug; 20(8):1329-37. PubMed ID: 12777509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Sexual isolation between sympatric and allopatric populations of Drosophila pseudoobscura and D. persimilis.
    Anderson WW; Kim YK
    Behav Genet; 2005 May; 35(3):305-12. PubMed ID: 15864445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Sympatry, allopatry and sexual isolation between Drosophila mojavensis and D. arizonae.
    Massie KR; Markow TA
    Hereditas; 2005 Feb; 142(2005):51-5. PubMed ID: 16970612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Are traits that experience reinforcement also under sexual selection?
    Higgie M; Blows MW
    Am Nat; 2007 Sep; 170(3):409-20. PubMed ID: 17879191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The evolution of reproductive character displacement conflicts with how sexual selection operates within a species.
    Higgie M; Blows MW
    Evolution; 2008 May; 62(5):1192-203. PubMed ID: 18298640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Influence of antibiotic treatment and Wolbachia curing on sexual isolation among Drosophila melanogaster cage populations.
    Koukou K; Pavlikaki H; Kilias G; Werren JH; Bourtzis K; Alahiotis SN
    Evolution; 2006 Jan; 60(1):87-96. PubMed ID: 16568634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Sexual conflict does not drive reproductive isolation in experimental populations of Drosophila pseudoobscura.
    Bacigalupe LD; Crudgington HS; Hunter F; Moore AJ; Snook RR
    J Evol Biol; 2007 Sep; 20(5):1763-71. PubMed ID: 17714294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.