These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16202626)

  • 41. fMRI data analysis with nonstationary noise models: a Bayesian approach.
    Luo H; Puthusserypady S
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2007 Sep; 54(9):1621-30. PubMed ID: 17867354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Symmetrical event-related EEG/fMRI information fusion in a variational Bayesian framework.
    Daunizeau J; Grova C; Marrelec G; Mattout J; Jbabdi S; Pélégrini-Issac M; Lina JM; Benali H
    Neuroimage; 2007 May; 36(1):69-87. PubMed ID: 17408972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Gaussian mixture model-based noise reduction in resting state fMRI data.
    Garg G; Prasad G; Coyle D
    J Neurosci Methods; 2013 Apr; 215(1):71-7. PubMed ID: 23499197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Using nonlinear models in fMRI data analysis: model selection and activation detection.
    Deneux T; Faugeras O
    Neuroimage; 2006 Oct; 32(4):1669-89. PubMed ID: 16844388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. An evaluation of thresholding techniques in fMRI analysis.
    Logan BR; Rowe DB
    Neuroimage; 2004 May; 22(1):95-108. PubMed ID: 15110000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Effects of repeatability measures on results of fMRI sICA: a study on simulated and real resting-state effects.
    Remes JJ; Starck T; Nikkinen J; Ollila E; Beckmann CF; Tervonen O; Kiviniemi V; Silven O
    Neuroimage; 2011 May; 56(2):554-69. PubMed ID: 20451623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. How ignoring physiological noise can bias the conclusions from fMRI simulation results.
    Welvaert M; Rosseel Y
    J Neurosci Methods; 2012 Oct; 211(1):125-32. PubMed ID: 22960507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Classification of fMRI time series in a low-dimensional subspace with a spatial prior.
    Meyer FG; Shen X
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2008 Jan; 27(1):87-98. PubMed ID: 18270065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Using non-negative matrix factorization for single-trial analysis of fMRI data.
    Lohmann G; Volz KG; Ullsperger M
    Neuroimage; 2007 Oct; 37(4):1148-60. PubMed ID: 17662621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Using ICA and realistic BOLD models to obtain joint EEG/fMRI solutions to the problem of source localization.
    Brookings T; Ortigue S; Grafton S; Carlson J
    Neuroimage; 2009 Jan; 44(2):411-20. PubMed ID: 18845263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. [Blind source separation for fMRI signals using a new independent component analysis algorithm and principal component analysis].
    Zhang W; Shi Z; Tang H; Tang Y
    Sheng Wu Yi Xue Gong Cheng Xue Za Zhi; 2007 Apr; 24(2):430-3. PubMed ID: 17591275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Detecting fMRI activation allowing for unknown latency of the hemodynamic response.
    Worsley KJ; Taylor JE
    Neuroimage; 2006 Jan; 29(2):649-54. PubMed ID: 16125978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Estimation of the hemodynamic response of fMRI Data using RBF neural network.
    Luo H; Puthusserypady S
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2007 Aug; 54(8):1371-81. PubMed ID: 17694857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. To smooth or not to smooth? Bias and efficiency in fMRI time-series analysis.
    Friston KJ; Josephs O; Zarahn E; Holmes AP; Rouquette S; Poline J
    Neuroimage; 2000 Aug; 12(2):196-208. PubMed ID: 10913325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Nonparametric trend estimation in the presence of fractal noise: application to fMRI time-series analysis.
    Afshinpour B; Hossein-Zadeh GA; Soltanian-Zadeh H
    J Neurosci Methods; 2008 Jun; 171(2):340-8. PubMed ID: 18482771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. A parallel approach to STAP implementation for fMRI data.
    Thompson EA
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2006 Feb; 23(2):216-21. PubMed ID: 16416435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Are fMRI event-related response constant in time? A model selection answer.
    Donnet S; Lavielle M; Poline JB
    Neuroimage; 2006 Jul; 31(3):1169-76. PubMed ID: 16647863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Modeling fMRI data generated by overlapping cognitive processes with unknown onsets using Hidden Process Models.
    Hutchinson RA; Niculescu RS; Keller TA; Rustandi I; Mitchell TM
    Neuroimage; 2009 May; 46(1):87-104. PubMed ID: 19457397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Imaging functional brain connectivity patterns from high-resolution EEG and fMRI via graph theory.
    Astolfi L; de Vico Fallani F; Cincotti F; Mattia D; Marciani MG; Bufalari S; Salinari S; Colosimo A; Ding L; Edgar JC; Heller W; Miller GA; He B; Babiloni F
    Psychophysiology; 2007 Nov; 44(6):880-93. PubMed ID: 17617172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Identification of large-scale networks in the brain using fMRI.
    Bellec P; Perlbarg V; Jbabdi S; Pélégrini-Issac M; Anton JL; Doyon J; Benali H
    Neuroimage; 2006 Feb; 29(4):1231-43. PubMed ID: 16246590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.