These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1620304)

  • 21. Evaluation of expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (ePTFE) versus polydioxanone (PDS) for the repair of dura mater defects.
    Viñas FC; Ferris D; Kupsky WJ; Dujovny M
    Neurol Res; 1999 Apr; 21(3):262-8. PubMed ID: 10319334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Vicryl (polyglactin 910) mesh as a dural substitute in the presence of pia arachnoid injury.
    Nussbaum CE; Maurer PK; McDonald JV
    J Neurosurg; 1989 Jul; 71(1):124-7. PubMed ID: 2738630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Clinical experience with a novel bovine collagen dura mater substitute.
    Costa BS; Cavalcanti-Mendes Gde A; Abreu MS; Sousa AA
    Arq Neuropsiquiatr; 2011 Apr; 69(2A):217-20. PubMed ID: 21537564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Dural substitute with polyglycolic acid mesh and fibrin glue for dural repair: technical note and preliminary results.
    Shimada Y; Hongo M; Miyakoshi N; Sugawara T; Kasukawa Y; Ando S; Ishikawa Y; Itoi E
    J Orthop Sci; 2006 Oct; 11(5):454-8. PubMed ID: 17013732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Effect of recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 on bone regeneration in large defects of the growing canine skull after dura mater replacement with a dura mater substitute.
    He D; Genecov DG; Herbert M; Barcelo R; Elsalanty ME; Weprin BE; Opperman LA
    J Neurosurg; 2010 Feb; 112(2):319-28. PubMed ID: 19267528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. A comparison of prosthetic materials used to repair abdominal wall defects.
    Jenkins SD; Klamer TW; Parteka JJ; Condon RE
    Surgery; 1983 Aug; 94(2):392-8. PubMed ID: 6224307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Time-sparing and effective procedure for dural closure in the posterior fossa using a vicryl mesh (Ethisorb).
    Reyes-Moreno I; Verheggen R
    Neurocirugia (Astur); 2006 Dec; 17(6):527-31. PubMed ID: 17242840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Usefulness of acellular dermal graft as a dural substitute in experimental model.
    Islam S; Ogane K; Ohkuma H; Suzuki S
    Surg Neurol; 2004 Mar; 61(3):297-302; discussion 303. PubMed ID: 14985013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Postoperative fibrosis after surgical treatment of the porcine spinal cord: a comparison of dural substitutes. Invited submission from the Joint Section Meeting on Disorders of the Spine and Peripheral Nerves, March 2004.
    Haq I; Cruz-Almeida Y; Siqueira EB; Norenberg M; Green BA; Levi AD
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2005 Jan; 2(1):50-4. PubMed ID: 15658126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Poly(3-hydroxybutyrate) (PHB) patches for covering anterior skull base defects - an animal study with minipigs.
    Bernd HE; Kunze C; Freier T; Sternberg K; Kramer S; Behrend D; Prall F; Donat M; Kramp B
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2009 Sep; 129(9):1010-7. PubMed ID: 19034735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. A new bioprosthesis in large abdominal wall defects.
    Meddings RN; Carachi R; Gorham S; French DA
    J Pediatr Surg; 1993 May; 28(5):660-3. PubMed ID: 8340852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. A comparison of intraperitoneal prostheses for the repair of abdominal muscular wall defects in rats.
    Pans A; Pierard GE
    Eur Surg Res; 1992; 24(1):54-60. PubMed ID: 1534053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Efficacy and safety of small intestinal submucosa in dural defect repair in a canine model.
    He SK; Guo JH; Wang ZL; Zhang Y; Tu YH; Wu SZ; Huang FG; Xie HQ
    Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl; 2017 Apr; 73():267-274. PubMed ID: 28183608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Use of a collagen coated vicryl tube in reconstruction of the porcine esophagus.
    Purushotham AD; Carachi R; Gorham SD; French DA; Shivas AA
    Eur J Pediatr Surg; 1991 Apr; 1(2):80-4. PubMed ID: 1854714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Waterjet dissection in pediatric cranioplasty.
    Tschan CA; Hermann EJ; Wagner W; Krauss JK; Oertel JM
    J Neurosurg Pediatr; 2010 Mar; 5(3):243-9. PubMed ID: 20192640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Vicryl-mesh wrap for the implantation of hydroxyapatite orbital implants: an animal model.
    Jordan DR; Ells A; Brownstein S; Munro SM; Grahovac SZ; Raymond F; Gilberg SM; Allen LH
    Can J Ophthalmol; 1995 Aug; 30(5):241-6. PubMed ID: 8529157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Intraoperative sealing of dura mater defects with a novel, synthetic, self adhesive patch: application experience in 25 patients.
    von der Brelie C; Soehle M; Clusmann HR
    Br J Neurosurg; 2012 Apr; 26(2):231-5. PubMed ID: 22077588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Transparent equine collagen biomatrix as dural repair. A prospective clinical study.
    Gazzeri R; Neroni M; Alfieri A; Galarza M; Faiola A; Esposito S; Giordano M
    Acta Neurochir (Wien); 2009 May; 151(5):537-43. PubMed ID: 19337680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Experimental evaluation of collagen sponge as a dural graft.
    Narotam PK; Van Dellen JR; Bhoola K; Raidoo D
    Br J Neurosurg; 1993; 7(6):635-41. PubMed ID: 8161425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. A new modified dura mater implant: characteristics in recipient dogs.
    Shi ZD; Liu MW; Qin ZZ; Wang QM; He HY; Guo Y; Yu ZH
    Br J Neurosurg; 2009 Feb; 23(1):71-5. PubMed ID: 19234912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.