These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

196 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16203692)

  • 1. Anatomical dolls: their use in assessment of children who may have been sexually abused.
    Faller KC
    J Child Sex Abus; 2005; 14(3):1-21. PubMed ID: 16203692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The use of anatomical dolls as a demonstration aid in child sexual abuse interviews: a study of forensic interviewers' perceptions.
    Hlavka HR; Olinger SD; Lashley JL
    J Child Sex Abus; 2010 Sep; 19(5):519-53. PubMed ID: 20924909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Developmental differences in the function and use of anatomical dolls during interviews with alleged sexual abuse victims.
    Thierry KL; Lamb ME; Orbach Y; Pipe ME
    J Consult Clin Psychol; 2005 Dec; 73(6):1125-34. PubMed ID: 16392985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Putting the anatomical doll controversy in perspective: an examination of the major uses and criticisms of the dolls in child sexual abuse evaluations.
    Everson MD; Boat BW
    Child Abuse Negl; 1994 Feb; 18(2):113-29. PubMed ID: 8199895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Sexualized doll play among young children: implications for the use of anatomical dolls in sexual abuse evaluations.
    Everson MD; Boat BW
    J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry; 1990 Sep; 29(5):736-42. PubMed ID: 2228926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Anatomic puppets. (An aid in examinations of sexually abused children)].
    Malá E
    Ceska Slov Psychiatr; 1996 May; 92(2):86-9. PubMed ID: 8925457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The use of dolls to interview young children: issues of symbolic representation.
    DeLoache JS; Marzolf DP
    J Exp Child Psychol; 1995 Aug; 60(1):155-73. PubMed ID: 7545206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Anatomically correct dolls used in interviews of young children suspected of having been sexually abused.
    Leventhal JM; Hamilton J; Rekedal S; Tebano-Micci A; Eyster C
    Pediatrics; 1989 Nov; 84(5):900-6. PubMed ID: 2797984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Forensic, cultural, and systems issues in child sexual abuse cases--part 1: an introduction.
    Tishelman AC; Geffner R
    J Child Sex Abus; 2010 Sep; 19(5):485-90. PubMed ID: 20924907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The use of anatomical dolls as assessment and evidentiary tools.
    Lie GY; Inman A
    Soc Work; 1991 Sep; 36(5):396-9. PubMed ID: 1925700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Use of nonanatomical dolls in the sexual abuse interview.
    Britton HL; O'Keefe MA
    Child Abuse Negl; 1991; 15(4):567-73. PubMed ID: 1959088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Questioning strategies in interviews with children who may have been sexually abused.
    DeVoe ER; Faller KC
    Child Welfare; 2002; 81(1):5-31. PubMed ID: 11893019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Allegations of sexual abuse of a child: what to do when a single forensic interview isn't enough.
    Faller KC; Cordisco-Steele L; Nelson-Gardell D
    J Child Sex Abus; 2010 Sep; 19(5):572-89. PubMed ID: 20924911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Use of anatomical dolls by Boston-area professionals.
    Kendall-Tackett KA; Watson MW
    Child Abuse Negl; 1992; 16(3):423-8. PubMed ID: 1617476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Specificity and sensitivity of sexually anatomically correct dolls in substantiating abuse: a pilot study.
    Realmuto GM; Jensen JB; Wescoe S
    J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry; 1990 Sep; 29(5):743-6. PubMed ID: 2228927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The use of anatomically correct dolls in the evaluation of sexually abused children.
    Goldberg CC; Yates A
    Am J Dis Child; 1990 Dec; 144(12):1334-6. PubMed ID: 2244615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Psychological science and the use of anatomically detailed dolls in child sexual-abuse assessments.
    Koocher GP; Goodman GS; White CS; Friedrich WN; Sivan AB; Reynolds CR
    Psychol Bull; 1995 Sep; 118(2):199-222. PubMed ID: 7568570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Assumptions and beliefs about the role of AD dolls in child sexual abuse validation interviews: are they supported empirically?
    Skinner LJ
    Behav Sci Law; 1996; 14(2):167-85. PubMed ID: 10160234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Interaction of normal children with anatomical dolls.
    Sivan AB; Schor DP; Koeppl GK; Noble LD
    Child Abuse Negl; 1988; 12(3):295-304. PubMed ID: 3167619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Investigative interviews of alleged sexual abuse victims with and without anatomical dolls.
    Lamb ME; Hershkowitz I; Sternberg KJ; Boat B; Everson MD
    Child Abuse Negl; 1996 Dec; 20(12):1251-9. PubMed ID: 8985616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.