These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1620564)

  • 1. Hysteresis, cooperativity, and depth averaging in dynamic random-dot stereograms.
    Anderson BL
    Percept Psychophys; 1992 Jun; 51(6):511-28. PubMed ID: 1620564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Temporal properties of disparity processing revealed by dynamic random-dot stereograms.
    Gheorghiu E; Erkelens CJ
    Perception; 2005; 34(10):1205-19. PubMed ID: 16309115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The effects of interocular correlation and contrast on stereoscopic depth magnitude estimation.
    Cisarik PM; Harwerth RS
    Optom Vis Sci; 2008 Mar; 85(3):164-73. PubMed ID: 18317331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Motion direction influences surface segmentation in stereo transparency.
    Goutcher R
    J Vis; 2016 Dec; 16(15):17. PubMed ID: 28006067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Perceptual artifacts in random-dot stereograms.
    Tsirlin I; Wilcox LM; Allison RS
    Perception; 2010; 39(3):349-55. PubMed ID: 20465171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Spatial properties of disparity pooling in human stereo vision.
    Parker AJ; Yang Y
    Vision Res; 1989; 29(11):1525-38. PubMed ID: 2635478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The perceived visual direction of monocular objects in random-dot stereograms is influenced by perceived depth and allelotropia.
    Hariharan-Vilupuru S; Bedell HE
    Vision Res; 2009 Jan; 49(2):190-201. PubMed ID: 18992271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Perceptual latency and complex random-dot stereograms.
    Bradshaw MF; Rogers BJ; De Bruyn B
    Perception; 1995; 24(7):749-59. PubMed ID: 8710438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Poor visibility of motion in depth is due to early motion averaging.
    Harris JM; Rushton SK
    Vision Res; 2003 Feb; 43(4):385-92. PubMed ID: 12535995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Differences in perceived depth for temporally correlated and uncorrelated dynamic random-dot stereograms.
    Gheorghiu E; Erkelens CJ
    Vision Res; 2005 Jun; 45(12):1603-14. PubMed ID: 15781076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effect of decorrelation on 3-D grating detection with static and dynamic random-dot stereograms.
    Palmisano S; Allison RS; Howard IP
    Vision Res; 2006 Jan; 46(1-2):57-71. PubMed ID: 16307771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Learning to see random-dot stereograms.
    O'Toole AJ; Kersten DJ
    Perception; 1992; 21(2):227-43. PubMed ID: 1513672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Disparity averaging across spatial scales.
    Rohaly AM; Wilson HR
    Vision Res; 1994 May; 34(10):1315-25. PubMed ID: 8023439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Enhancing Motion-In-Depth Perception of Random-Dot Stereograms.
    Zhang D; Nourrit V; De Bougrenet de la Tocnaye JL
    Perception; 2018 Jul; 47(7):722-734. PubMed ID: 29914316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Disparity-evoked vergence is driven by interocular correlation.
    Mallot HA; Roll A; Arndt PA
    Vision Res; 1996 Sep; 36(18):2925-37. PubMed ID: 8917794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A relative frame of reference underlies reversed depth perception in anticorrelated random-dot stereograms.
    Aoki SC; Shiozaki HM; Fujita I
    J Vis; 2017 Oct; 17(12):17. PubMed ID: 29071354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Depth in anticorrelated stereograms: effects of spatial density and interocular delay.
    Cogan AI; Lomakin AJ; Rossi AF
    Vision Res; 1993 Sep; 33(14):1959-75. PubMed ID: 8249313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Neurons in Striate Cortex Signal Disparity in Half-Matched Random-Dot Stereograms.
    Henriksen S; Read JC; Cumming BG
    J Neurosci; 2016 Aug; 36(34):8967-76. PubMed ID: 27559177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Constraints on human stereo dot matching.
    Harris JM; Parker AJ
    Vision Res; 1994 Oct; 34(20):2761-72. PubMed ID: 7975312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Stereopsis with persisting and dynamic textures.
    Allison RS; Howard IP
    Vision Res; 2000; 40(28):3823-7. PubMed ID: 11090674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.