113 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16206249)
1. Inference of nested variance components in a longitudinal myopia intervention trial.
Hsiao CK; Tsai MY; Chen HM
Stat Med; 2005 Nov; 24(21):3251-67. PubMed ID: 16206249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Sample size for a two-group comparison of repeated binary measurements using GEE.
Jung SH; Ahn CW
Stat Med; 2005 Sep; 24(17):2583-96. PubMed ID: 16118812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Atropine for the treatment of childhood myopia: effect on myopia progression after cessation of atropine.
Tong L; Huang XL; Koh AL; Zhang X; Tan DT; Chua WH
Ophthalmology; 2009 Mar; 116(3):572-9. PubMed ID: 19167081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Meta-analysis of individual patient data versus aggregate data from longitudinal clinical trials.
Jones AP; Riley RD; Williamson PR; Whitehead A
Clin Trials; 2009 Feb; 6(1):16-27. PubMed ID: 19254930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Sample size determination for constrained longitudinal data analysis.
Lu K; Mehrotra DV; Liu G
Stat Med; 2009 Feb; 28(4):679-99. PubMed ID: 19051207
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Applying linear mixed models to estimate reliability in clinical trial data with repeated measurements.
Vangeneugden T; Laenen A; Geys H; Renard D; Molenberghs G
Control Clin Trials; 2004 Feb; 25(1):13-30. PubMed ID: 14980746
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Sensitivity analysis of longitudinal normal data with drop-outs.
Minini P; Chavance M
Stat Med; 2004 Apr; 23(7):1039-54. PubMed ID: 15057877
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Nested model selection for longitudinal data using information criteria and the conditional adjustment strategy].
Vallejo Seco G; Arnau Gras J; Bono Cabré R; Fernández García P; Tuero Herrero E
Psicothema; 2010 May; 22(2):323-33. PubMed ID: 20423639
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A method to estimate the variance of an endpoint from an on-going blinded trial.
Xing B; Ganju J
Stat Med; 2005 Jun; 24(12):1807-14. PubMed ID: 15803440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A comparison of several approaches for choosing between working correlation structures in generalized estimating equation analysis of longitudinal binary data.
Shults J; Sun W; Tu X; Kim H; Amsterdam J; Hilbe JM; Ten-Have T
Stat Med; 2009 Aug; 28(18):2338-55. PubMed ID: 19472307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Implementing a decision-theoretic design in clinical trials: why and how?
Palmer CR; Shahumyan H
Stat Med; 2007 Nov; 26(27):4939-57. PubMed ID: 17582801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Smooth bootstrap methods for analysis of longitudinal data.
Li Y; Wang YG
Stat Med; 2008 Mar; 27(7):937-53. PubMed ID: 17701950
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Functional regression analysis using an F test for longitudinal data with large numbers of repeated measures.
Yang X; Shen Q; Xu H; Shoptaw S
Stat Med; 2007 Mar; 26(7):1552-66. PubMed ID: 16817228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Factors associated with high myopia after 7 years of follow-up in the Correction of Myopia Evaluation Trial (COMET) Cohort.
Gwiazda J; Hyman L; Dong LM; Everett D; Norton T; Kurtz D; Manny R; Marsh-Tootle W; Scheiman M;
Ophthalmic Epidemiol; 2007; 14(4):230-7. PubMed ID: 17896302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Atropine for the treatment of childhood myopia.
Chua WH; Balakrishnan V; Chan YH; Tong L; Ling Y; Quah BL; Tan D
Ophthalmology; 2006 Dec; 113(12):2285-91. PubMed ID: 16996612
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Assessing the effects of interventions using longitudinal data with samples subject to selection.
Lin HM; Hughes MD
Biometrics; 1997 Sep; 53(3):924-36. PubMed ID: 9290223
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The impact of omitting the interaction between crossed factors in cross-classified random effects modelling.
Shi Y; Leite W; Algina J
Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2010 Feb; 63(Pt 1):1-15. PubMed ID: 19243680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of variance estimation approaches in a two-state Markov model for longitudinal data with misclassification.
Rosychuk RJ; Sheng X; Stuber JL
Stat Med; 2006 Jun; 25(11):1906-21. PubMed ID: 16220512
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Group sequential clinical trials for longitudinal data with analyses using summary statistics.
Kittelson JM; Sharples K; Emerson SS
Stat Med; 2005 Aug; 24(16):2457-75. PubMed ID: 15977295
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Quantile regression for longitudinal data using the asymmetric Laplace distribution.
Geraci M; Bottai M
Biostatistics; 2007 Jan; 8(1):140-54. PubMed ID: 16636139
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
