199 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16206810)
1. CMS moving steadlly toward P4P; quality pros express reservations.
Healthcare Benchmarks Qual Improv; 2005 Oct; 12(10):109-12. PubMed ID: 16206810
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Pay for performance and the hospital quality initiative.
Elliott B
Del Med J; 2005 Aug; 77(8):289-96. PubMed ID: 16184783
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Right on the money. CMS awarding pay-for-performance bonuses.
Becker C
Mod Healthc; 2005 Nov; 35(46):8-9. PubMed ID: 16334812
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Providers: more pay in P4P. CMS says higher incentive opportunities possible.
Lubell J
Mod Healthc; 2008 Sep; 38(37):8-9. PubMed ID: 18810821
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. "P4P"--a force to be reckoned with.
Kahn C
Hosp Outlook; 2005; 8(2):12. PubMed ID: 16075769
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Data from landmark P4P project are in: learn what top-rated organizations did.
Hosp Peer Rev; 2006 Feb; 31(2):17-20. PubMed ID: 16479863
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. CMS trumpets PGP demonstration successes.
Dis Manag Advis; 2008 Oct; 14(10):1-6. PubMed ID: 19025162
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Study casts new doubt on effectiveness of P4P.
Healthcare Benchmarks Qual Improv; 2007 Aug; 14(8):88-9. PubMed ID: 17715880
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. CMS dangling carrot. Up to 50,000 dollars available in P4P plan.
DoBias M
Mod Healthc; 2006 Oct; 36(43):33. PubMed ID: 17128588
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Pay for performance in radiology: ACR white paper.
Moser JW; Wilcox PA; Bjork SS; Cushing T; Dennis M; Greissing JE; Keysor K; McKenzie J; Weinreb JC
J Am Coll Radiol; 2006 Sep; 3(9):650-64. PubMed ID: 17412146
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Response is mixed on CMS value-based purchasing paper.
Healthcare Benchmarks Qual Improv; 2007 Jul; 14(7):73-6. PubMed ID: 17784719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Meeting the pay-for-performance imperative.
Wilensky GR
Healthc Financ Manage; 2005 Dec; 59(12):28-9. PubMed ID: 16355751
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Physician-focused option shows savings.
Dis Manag Advis; 2007 Nov; 13(11):125-9, 121. PubMed ID: 18050883
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. P4P money slow to come groups disagree with CMS' methodology, results.
Lubell J
Mod Healthc; 2008 Aug; 38(33):8-9. PubMed ID: 18780450
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. CMS prepares to tie Medicare physician pay to performance.
Manag Care; 2012 May; 21(5):15. PubMed ID: 22675733
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Integration demonstration. The CMS' latest pay-for-performance initiative will test the power of integrated delivery systems to alter doc practice patterns.
Romano M
Mod Healthc; 2005 Oct; 35(44):6-7, 16, 1. PubMed ID: 16300201
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Weak prospects. Federal Medicaid P4P proposal has skeptics.
Lubell J
Mod Healthc; 2007 Feb; 37(8):10. PubMed ID: 17348345
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Hospitals must overcome physician resistance before P4P can take root.
Health Care Strateg Manage; 2006 Jul; 24(7):1, 14-6. PubMed ID: 16903396
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Do demonstration project's numbers really validate P4P? Observers say other factors play role in improvement.
Healthcare Benchmarks Qual Improv; 2006 Feb; 13(2):13-6. PubMed ID: 16544555
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Pay-for-performance options in health care.
MacStravic S
Healthc Financ Manage; 2006 Dec; 60(12):122-5. PubMed ID: 17193840
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
