205 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16206845)
1. Stormwater quality modelling in combined sewers: calibration and uncertainty analysis.
Kanso A; Chebbo G; Tassin B
Water Sci Technol; 2005; 52(3):63-71. PubMed ID: 16206845
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Bayesian approach for the calibration of models: application to an urban stormwater pollution model.
Kanso A; Gromaire MC; Gaume E; Tassin B; Chebbo G
Water Sci Technol; 2003; 47(4):77-84. PubMed ID: 12666804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Bayesian analysis for erosion modelling of sediments in combined sewer systems.
Kanso A; Chebbo G; Tassin B
Water Sci Technol; 2005; 52(5):135-42. PubMed ID: 16248189
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of different uncertainty techniques in urban stormwater quantity and quality modelling.
Dotto CB; Mannina G; Kleidorfer M; Vezzaro L; Henrichs M; McCarthy DT; Freni G; Rauch W; Deletic A
Water Res; 2012 May; 46(8):2545-58. PubMed ID: 22402270
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Stormwater quality models: performance and sensitivity analysis.
Dotto CB; Kleidorfer M; Deletic A; Fletcher TD; McCarthy DT; Rauch W
Water Sci Technol; 2010; 62(4):837-43. PubMed ID: 20729586
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Wet weather water quality modelling of a Portuguese urban catchment: difficulties and benefits.
David LM; Matos RS
Water Sci Technol; 2002; 45(3):131-40. PubMed ID: 11902464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A benchmark methodology for managing uncertainties in urban runoff quality models.
Kanso A; Tassin B; Chebbo G
Water Sci Technol; 2005; 51(2):163-70. PubMed ID: 15790240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Uncertainty in urban stormwater quality modelling: the influence of likelihood measure formulation in the GLUE methodology.
Freni G; Mannina G; Viviani G
Sci Total Environ; 2009 Dec; 408(1):138-45. PubMed ID: 19819524
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Impact of input data uncertainties on urban stormwater model parameters.
Kleidorfer M; Deletic A; Fletcher TD; Rauch W
Water Sci Technol; 2009; 60(6):1545-54. PubMed ID: 19759457
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Analysis of parameter uncertainty of a flow and quality stormwater model.
Dotto CB; Deletic A; Fletcher TD
Water Sci Technol; 2009; 60(3):717-25. PubMed ID: 19657167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Stormwater quality models: sensitivity to calibration data.
Mourad M; Bertrand-Krajewski JL; Chebbo G
Water Sci Technol; 2005; 52(5):61-8. PubMed ID: 16248181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Probabilistic emission and immission modelling: case-study of the combined sewer-WWTP-receiving water system at Dessel (Belgium).
Willems P; Berlamont J
Water Sci Technol; 2002; 45(3):117-24. PubMed ID: 11902462
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Calibration and validation of multiple regression models for stormwater quality prediction: data partitioning, effect of dataset size and characteristics.
Mourad M; Bertrand-Krajewski JL; Chebbo G
Water Sci Technol; 2005; 52(3):45-52. PubMed ID: 16206843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Suspended solids transport: an analysis based on turbidity measurements and event based fully calibrated hydrodynamic models.
Langeveld JG; Veldkamp RG; Clemens F
Water Sci Technol; 2005; 52(3):93-101. PubMed ID: 16206848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The influence of rainfall time resolution for urban water quality modelling.
Freni G; Mannina G; Viviani G
Water Sci Technol; 2010; 61(9):2381-90. PubMed ID: 20418636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Assessment of annual pollutant loads in combined sewers from continuous turbidity measurements: sensitivity to calibration data.
Lacour C; Joannis C; Chebbo G
Water Res; 2009 May; 43(8):2179-90. PubMed ID: 19303128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Sediment and pollutant load modelling using an integrated urban drainage modelling toolbox: an application of City Drain.
Rodríguez JP; Achleitner S; Möderl M; Rauch W; Maksimović C; McIntyre N; Díaz-Granados MA; Rodríguez MS
Water Sci Technol; 2010; 61(9):2273-82. PubMed ID: 20418624
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A Bayesian regression approach to assess uncertainty in pollutant wash-off modelling.
Egodawatta P; Haddad K; Rahman A; Goonetilleke A
Sci Total Environ; 2014 May; 479-480():233-40. PubMed ID: 24561928
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Uncertainty in radiation dosimetry: basic concepts and methods.
Siebert BR
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2006; 121(1):3-11. PubMed ID: 16868011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. How uncertain is model-based prediction of copper loads in stormwater runoff?
Lindblom E; Ahlman S; Mikkelsen PS
Water Sci Technol; 2007; 56(11):65-72. PubMed ID: 18057643
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
