These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

98 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1620714)

  • 1. Interspecies sensitivity to chemical carcinogens.
    Nesnow S; Agarwal SC; Lambert GR; Earley K; Gupta RC
    Prog Clin Biol Res; 1992; 374():381-97. PubMed ID: 1620714
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [The DDD and AKR strains of mice and the promotion of chemical carcinogenesis of the skin].
    Ohno H
    Fukuoka Igaku Zasshi; 1987 Jan; 78(1):1-21. PubMed ID: 3570134
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Carcinogenic chemical-response "fingerprint" for male F344 rats exposed to a series of 195 chemicals: implications for predicting carcinogens with transgenic models.
    Johnson FM
    Environ Mol Mutagen; 1999; 34(4):234-45. PubMed ID: 10618171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Are tumor incidence rates from chronic bioassays telling us what we need to know about carcinogens?
    Gaylor DW
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2005 Mar; 41(2):128-33. PubMed ID: 15698536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluation of the ability of a battery of three in vitro genotoxicity tests to discriminate rodent carcinogens and non-carcinogens II. Further analysis of mammalian cell results, relative predictivity and tumour profiles.
    Kirkland D; Aardema M; Müller L; Makoto H
    Mutat Res; 2006 Sep; 608(1):29-42. PubMed ID: 16769241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Neonatal mouse assay for tumorigenicity: alternative to the chronic rodent bioassay.
    Flammang TJ; Tungeln LS; Kadlubar FF; Fu PP
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 1997 Oct; 26(2):230-40. PubMed ID: 9356286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Epidemiological and experimental applications to occupational cancer prevention.
    Vainio H; Hemminki K
    J UOEH; 1989 Mar; 11 Suppl():323-45. PubMed ID: 2664947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Use of non-mammalian species in bioassays for carcinogenicity.
    Bunton TE
    IARC Sci Publ; 1999; (146):151-84. PubMed ID: 10353387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Carcinogenic evaluation of 2,3-dimethyl-2,3-dinitrobutane via the mouse skin bioassay.
    Reddy TV; Olson GR; Daniel FB; Robinson M
    J Appl Toxicol; 1994; 14(3):231-2. PubMed ID: 8083485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The results of assays in Drosophila as indicators of exposure to carcinogens.
    Vogel EW; Graf U; Frei HJ; Nivard MM
    IARC Sci Publ; 1999; (146):427-70. PubMed ID: 10353398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Experimental models of benzene carcinogenesis.
    Craig PH
    Prog Clin Biol Res; 1992; 374():107-22. PubMed ID: 1620700
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Genetically altered mouse models for identifying carcinogens.
    Tennant RW; Stasiewicz S; Mennear J; French JE; Spalding JW
    IARC Sci Publ; 1999; (146):123-50. PubMed ID: 10353386
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. In vitro mammalian cell genotoxicity assays: their use and interpretation.
    McGregor D
    Prog Clin Biol Res; 1990; 340B():159-69. PubMed ID: 2203003
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Highlights of International meeting on Alternative Methods of Carcinogenicity Testing, Leesburg, VA, November 1-3, 2000, Sponsored by the Health and Environmental Sciences Institute.
    Jollow DJ
    J Agromedicine; 2004; 9(2):427-9. PubMed ID: 19785235
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Use of Syrian hamster embryo and BALB/c 3T3 cell transformation for assessing the carcinogenic potential of chemicals.
    LeBoeuf RA; Kerckaert KA; Aardema MJ; Isfort RJ
    IARC Sci Publ; 1999; (146):409-25. PubMed ID: 10353397
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Predicting chemicals causing cancer in animals as human carcinogens.
    Huff J
    Occup Environ Med; 2010 Oct; 67(10):720. PubMed ID: 20837652
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Application of short-term assays by the petroleum industry to identify skin carcinogens.
    Thomas FB; Simpson BJ
    Prog Clin Biol Res; 1989; 298():393-9. PubMed ID: 2664813
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparability of results of postnatal and long-term tests for carcinogenicity.
    Sýkora I; Vortel V
    Neoplasma; 1993; 40(5):321-7. PubMed ID: 8272162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Short-and medium-term carcinogenicity tests: simple initiation-promotion assay systems.
    Tsuda H; Park CB; Moore MA
    IARC Sci Publ; 1999; (146):203-49. PubMed ID: 10353389
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The rodent carcinogenicity bioassay produces a similar frequency of tumor increases and decreases: implications for risk assessment.
    Davies TS; Monro A
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 1994 Dec; 20(3 Pt 1):281-301. PubMed ID: 7724835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.