110 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16207384)
1. Conventional liquid-based techniques versus Cytyc Thinprep processing of urinary samples: a qualitative approach.
Piaton E; Faÿnel J; Hutin K; Ranchin MC; Cottier M
BMC Clin Pathol; 2005 Oct; 5():9. PubMed ID: 16207384
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Cost efficiency analysis of modern cytocentrifugation methods versus liquid based (Cytyc Thinprep) processing of urinary samples.
Piaton E; Hutin K; Faÿnel J; Ranchin MC; Cottier M
J Clin Pathol; 2004 Nov; 57(11):1208-12. PubMed ID: 15509686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A Comparison Between ThinPrep Monolayer and Cytospin Cytology for the Detection of Bladder Cancer.
Kim JY; Kim HJ
Korean J Urol; 2014 Jun; 55(6):390-4. PubMed ID: 24955223
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. ThinPrep processing of endoscopic brushing specimens.
Wang HH; Sovie S; Trawinski G; Garcia LW; Abu-Jawdeh GM; Upton M; Werneke S
Am J Clin Pathol; 1996 Feb; 105(2):163-7. PubMed ID: 8607439
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. ThinPrep vs. conventional smear cytologic preparations in analyzing fine-needle aspiration specimens from palpable breast masses.
Biscotti CV; Shorie JH; Gramlich TL; Easley KA
Diagn Cytopathol; 1999 Aug; 21(2):137-41. PubMed ID: 10425053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of fluid-based, thin-layer processing and conventional Papanicolaou methods for uterine cervical cytology.
Wang TY; Chen HS; Yang YC; Tsou MC
J Formos Med Assoc; 1999 Jul; 98(7):500-5. PubMed ID: 10463000
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of conventional cytologic smears and ThinPrep preparations from the anal canal.
Darragh TM; Jay N; Tupkelewicz BA; Hogeboom CJ; Holly EA; Palefsky JM
Acta Cytol; 1997; 41(4):1167-70. PubMed ID: 9250316
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Analysis of urine cytology tests in 120 paired cases.
Sng KK; Nga ME; Tan SY; Walker T
Acta Cytol; 2007; 51(5):782-7. PubMed ID: 17910349
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison between cytospin and liquid-based cytology in cerebrospinal fluid diagnosis of neoplastic diseases: A single institution experience.
Straccia P; Fadda G; Pierconti F
Cytopathology; 2019 Mar; 30(2):236-240. PubMed ID: 30468697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Liquid-based cervical-cell collection with brushes and wooden spatulas: a comparison of 100 conventional smears from high-risk women to liquid-fixed cytocentrifuge slides, demonstrating a cost-effective, alternative monolayer slide preparation method.
Johnson T; Maksem JA; Belsheim BL; Roose EB; Klock LA; Eatwell L
Diagn Cytopathol; 2000 Feb; 22(2):86-91. PubMed ID: 10649517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison between cytospin and liquid-based cytology in urine specimens classified according to the Paris System for Reporting Urinary Cytology.
Straccia P; Bizzarro T; Fadda G; Pierconti F
Cancer Cytopathol; 2016 Jul; 124(7):519-23. PubMed ID: 26989867
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of ThinPrep and conventional preparations on fine needle aspiration cytology material.
Dey P; Luthra UK; George J; Zuhairy F; George SS; Haji BI
Acta Cytol; 2000; 44(1):46-50. PubMed ID: 10667159
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Split-sample comparison of urothelial cells in ThinPrep and cytospin preparations in urinary cytology: Do we need to adjust The Paris System for Reporting Urinary Cytology criteria?
Richardson CJ; Pambuccian SE; Barkan GA
Cancer Cytopathol; 2020 Feb; 128(2):119-125. PubMed ID: 31774630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Use of a thin-layer technique in thyroid fine needle aspiration.
Malle D; Valeri RM; Pazaitou-Panajiotou K; Kiziridou A; Vainas I; Destouni C
Acta Cytol; 2006; 50(1):23-7. PubMed ID: 16514836
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of ThinPrep and conventional preparations in pancreatic fine-needle aspiration biopsy.
de Luna R; Eloubeidi MA; Sheffield MV; Eltoum I; Jhala N; Jhala D; Chen VK; Chhieng DC
Diagn Cytopathol; 2004 Feb; 30(2):71-6. PubMed ID: 14755754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Which are more correctly diagnosed: conventional Papanicolaou smears or Thinprep samples? A comparative study of 9 years of external quality-assurance testing.
Cummings MC; Marquart L; Pelecanos AM; Perkins G; Papadimos D; O'Rourke P; Ross JA
Cancer Cytopathol; 2015 Feb; 123(2):108-16. PubMed ID: 25487287
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of thin-layer methods in urine cytology.
Wright RG; Halford JA
Cytopathology; 2001 Oct; 12(5):306-13. PubMed ID: 11722510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Morphologic criteria associated with Trichomonas vaginalis in liquid-based cytology.
Noël JC; Engohan-Aloghe C
Acta Cytol; 2010; 54(4):582-6. PubMed ID: 20715660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Improved Accuracy for Cervical Cytology with the ThinPrep Method and the Endocervical Brush-Spatula Collection Procedure.
Corkill M; Knapp D; Hutchinson ML
J Low Genit Tract Dis; 1998 Jan; 2(1):12-6. PubMed ID: 25951356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Cytologic diagnosis of anal intraepithelial neoplasia using smears and cytyc thin-preps.
Sherman ME; Friedman HB; Busseniers AE; Kelly WF; Carner TC; Saah AJ
Mod Pathol; 1995 Apr; 8(3):270-4. PubMed ID: 7617653
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
