These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
207 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16208013)
1. Use of a selective enrichment broth to recover Clostridium difficile from stool swabs stored under different conditions. Arroyo LG; Rousseau J; Willey BM; Low DE; Staempfli H; McGeer A; Weese JS J Clin Microbiol; 2005 Oct; 43(10):5341-3. PubMed ID: 16208013 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of selective media for optimal recovery of Clostridium difficile from diarrhoeal stools. Niyogi SK; Pal SC Indian J Med Res; 1992 Jul; 95():181-3. PubMed ID: 1398806 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Improved recovery of Clostridium difficile spores with the incorporation of synthetic taurocholate in cycloserine-cefoxitin-fructose agar (CCFA). Foster NF; Riley TV Pathology; 2012 Jun; 44(4):354-6. PubMed ID: 22531346 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Isolation and quantitation of Clostridium difficile in aqueous and fecal matter using two types of selective media. Housman ST; Banevicius MA; Lamb LM; Nicolau DP J Microbiol Immunol Infect; 2016 Jun; 49(3):445-7. PubMed ID: 26198865 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of cycloserine-cefoxitin-fructose agar (CCFA) and taurocholate-CCFA for recovery of Clostridium difficile during surveillance of hospitalized patients. Bliss DZ; Johnson S; Clabots CR; Savik K; Gerding DN Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis; 1997 Sep; 29(1):1-4. PubMed ID: 9350408 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Role of culture and toxin detection in laboratory testing for diagnosis of Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea. Peterson LR; Kelly PJ; Nordbrock HA Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis; 1996 Apr; 15(4):330-6. PubMed ID: 8781886 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Improvement of Clostridium difficile isolation by heat-shock and typing of the isolated strains by SDS-PAGE. Lahn M; Tyler G; Däubener W; Hadding U Eur J Epidemiol; 1993 May; 9(3):327-34. PubMed ID: 8405320 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The incidence of nosocomial toxigenic clostridium difficile associated diarrhea in Tehran tertiary medical centers. Sadeghifard N; Salari MH; Ghassemi MR; Eshraghi S; Amin Harati F Acta Med Iran; 2010; 48(5):320-5. PubMed ID: 21287466 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluation of cycloserine-cefoxitin fructose agar (CCFA), CCFA with horse blood and taurocholate, and cycloserine-cefoxitin mannitol broth with taurocholate and lysozyme for recovery of Clostridium difficile isolates from fecal samples. Tyrrell KL; Citron DM; Leoncio ES; Merriam CV; Goldstein EJ J Clin Microbiol; 2013 Sep; 51(9):3094-6. PubMed ID: 23804392 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Investigation of toxin genes of Clostridium difficile strains isolated from hospitalized patients with diarrhoea at Marmara University Hospital]. Deniz U; Ulger N; Aksu B; Karavuş M; Söyletir G Mikrobiyol Bul; 2011 Jan; 45(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 21341153 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Selective and differential medium for isolation of Clostridium difficile. George WL; Sutter VL; Citron D; Finegold SM J Clin Microbiol; 1979 Feb; 9(2):214-9. PubMed ID: 429542 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Isolation of Clostridium difficile from faecal specimens--a comparison of chromID C. difficile agar and cycloserine-cefoxitin-fructose agar. Carson KC; Boseiwaqa LV; Thean SK; Foster NF; Riley TV J Med Microbiol; 2013 Sep; 62(Pt 9):1423-1427. PubMed ID: 23579394 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Non-selective and selective enrichment media for the recovery of Clostridium difficile from chopped beef. Chai C; Lee KS; Lee D; Lee S; Oh SW J Microbiol Methods; 2015 Feb; 109():20-4. PubMed ID: 25499549 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of culture based methods for the isolation of Clostridium difficile from stool samples in a research setting. Lister M; Stevenson E; Heeg D; Minton NP; Kuehne SA Anaerobe; 2014 Aug; 28():226-9. PubMed ID: 25038491 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of media for screening of diarrheic stools for the recovery of Clostridium difficile. Iwen PC; Booth SJ; Woods GL J Clin Microbiol; 1989 Sep; 27(9):2105-6. PubMed ID: 2778074 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Improving culture media for the isolation of Clostridium difficile from compost. Dharmasena M; Jiang X Anaerobe; 2018 Jun; 51():1-7. PubMed ID: 29518533 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluation of new selective culture media and a rapid fluorescence in situ hybridization assay for identification of Clostridium difficile from stool samples. Bloedt K; Riecker M; Poppert S; Wellinghausen N J Med Microbiol; 2009 Jul; 58(Pt 7):874-877. PubMed ID: 19502365 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of ChromID C. difficile agar and cycloserine-cefoxitin-fructose agar for the recovery of Clostridium difficile. Boseiwaqa LV; Foster NF; Thean SK; Squire MM; Riley TV; Carson KC Pathology; 2013 Aug; 45(5):495-500. PubMed ID: 23846295 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparative analysis of different methods to detect Clostridium difficile infection. Calderaro A; Buttrini M; Martinelli M; Gorrini C; Montecchini S; Medici MC; Arcangeletti MC; De Conto F; Covan S; Chezzi C New Microbiol; 2013 Jan; 36(1):57-63. PubMed ID: 23435816 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]