212 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16208013)
1. Use of a selective enrichment broth to recover Clostridium difficile from stool swabs stored under different conditions.
Arroyo LG; Rousseau J; Willey BM; Low DE; Staempfli H; McGeer A; Weese JS
J Clin Microbiol; 2005 Oct; 43(10):5341-3. PubMed ID: 16208013
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of selective media for optimal recovery of Clostridium difficile from diarrhoeal stools.
Niyogi SK; Pal SC
Indian J Med Res; 1992 Jul; 95():181-3. PubMed ID: 1398806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Improved recovery of Clostridium difficile spores with the incorporation of synthetic taurocholate in cycloserine-cefoxitin-fructose agar (CCFA).
Foster NF; Riley TV
Pathology; 2012 Jun; 44(4):354-6. PubMed ID: 22531346
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Isolation and quantitation of Clostridium difficile in aqueous and fecal matter using two types of selective media.
Housman ST; Banevicius MA; Lamb LM; Nicolau DP
J Microbiol Immunol Infect; 2016 Jun; 49(3):445-7. PubMed ID: 26198865
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of cycloserine-cefoxitin-fructose agar (CCFA) and taurocholate-CCFA for recovery of Clostridium difficile during surveillance of hospitalized patients.
Bliss DZ; Johnson S; Clabots CR; Savik K; Gerding DN
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis; 1997 Sep; 29(1):1-4. PubMed ID: 9350408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Role of culture and toxin detection in laboratory testing for diagnosis of Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea.
Peterson LR; Kelly PJ; Nordbrock HA
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis; 1996 Apr; 15(4):330-6. PubMed ID: 8781886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Improvement of Clostridium difficile isolation by heat-shock and typing of the isolated strains by SDS-PAGE.
Lahn M; Tyler G; Däubener W; Hadding U
Eur J Epidemiol; 1993 May; 9(3):327-34. PubMed ID: 8405320
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The incidence of nosocomial toxigenic clostridium difficile associated diarrhea in Tehran tertiary medical centers.
Sadeghifard N; Salari MH; Ghassemi MR; Eshraghi S; Amin Harati F
Acta Med Iran; 2010; 48(5):320-5. PubMed ID: 21287466
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluation of cycloserine-cefoxitin fructose agar (CCFA), CCFA with horse blood and taurocholate, and cycloserine-cefoxitin mannitol broth with taurocholate and lysozyme for recovery of Clostridium difficile isolates from fecal samples.
Tyrrell KL; Citron DM; Leoncio ES; Merriam CV; Goldstein EJ
J Clin Microbiol; 2013 Sep; 51(9):3094-6. PubMed ID: 23804392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Investigation of toxin genes of Clostridium difficile strains isolated from hospitalized patients with diarrhoea at Marmara University Hospital].
Deniz U; Ulger N; Aksu B; Karavuş M; Söyletir G
Mikrobiyol Bul; 2011 Jan; 45(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 21341153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Laboratory maintenance of Clostridium difficile.
Sorg JA; Dineen SS
Curr Protoc Microbiol; 2009 Feb; Chapter 9():Unit9A.1. PubMed ID: 19235151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Selective and differential medium for isolation of Clostridium difficile.
George WL; Sutter VL; Citron D; Finegold SM
J Clin Microbiol; 1979 Feb; 9(2):214-9. PubMed ID: 429542
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Isolation of Clostridium difficile from faecal specimens--a comparison of chromID C. difficile agar and cycloserine-cefoxitin-fructose agar.
Carson KC; Boseiwaqa LV; Thean SK; Foster NF; Riley TV
J Med Microbiol; 2013 Sep; 62(Pt 9):1423-1427. PubMed ID: 23579394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Non-selective and selective enrichment media for the recovery of Clostridium difficile from chopped beef.
Chai C; Lee KS; Lee D; Lee S; Oh SW
J Microbiol Methods; 2015 Feb; 109():20-4. PubMed ID: 25499549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of culture based methods for the isolation of Clostridium difficile from stool samples in a research setting.
Lister M; Stevenson E; Heeg D; Minton NP; Kuehne SA
Anaerobe; 2014 Aug; 28():226-9. PubMed ID: 25038491
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of media for screening of diarrheic stools for the recovery of Clostridium difficile.
Iwen PC; Booth SJ; Woods GL
J Clin Microbiol; 1989 Sep; 27(9):2105-6. PubMed ID: 2778074
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Improving culture media for the isolation of Clostridium difficile from compost.
Dharmasena M; Jiang X
Anaerobe; 2018 Jun; 51():1-7. PubMed ID: 29518533
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluation of new selective culture media and a rapid fluorescence in situ hybridization assay for identification of Clostridium difficile from stool samples.
Bloedt K; Riecker M; Poppert S; Wellinghausen N
J Med Microbiol; 2009 Jul; 58(Pt 7):874-877. PubMed ID: 19502365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of ChromID C. difficile agar and cycloserine-cefoxitin-fructose agar for the recovery of Clostridium difficile.
Boseiwaqa LV; Foster NF; Thean SK; Squire MM; Riley TV; Carson KC
Pathology; 2013 Aug; 45(5):495-500. PubMed ID: 23846295
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparative analysis of different methods to detect Clostridium difficile infection.
Calderaro A; Buttrini M; Martinelli M; Gorrini C; Montecchini S; Medici MC; Arcangeletti MC; De Conto F; Covan S; Chezzi C
New Microbiol; 2013 Jan; 36(1):57-63. PubMed ID: 23435816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
