These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

310 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16208613)

  • 1. Hemodynamic performance and clinical consequences of aortic valve replacement with 21-mm sized pericardial bioprostheses.
    Boeken U; Litmathe J; Kurt M; Feindt P; Gams E
    Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2005 Oct; 53(5):281-4. PubMed ID: 16208613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Aortic valve replacement with new-generation stentless pericardial valves: short-term clinical and hemodynamic results.
    Grubitzsch H; Linneweber J; Kossagk C; Sanli E; Beholz S; Konertz WF
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2005 Sep; 14(5):623-9. PubMed ID: 16245501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Ten-year comparison of pericardial tissue valves versus mechanical prostheses for aortic valve replacement in patients younger than 60 years of age.
    Weber A; Noureddine H; Englberger L; Dick F; Gahl B; Aymard T; Czerny M; Tevaearai H; Stalder M; Carrel TP
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2012 Nov; 144(5):1075-83. PubMed ID: 22341653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Hemodynamics of Pericardial Aortic Valves: Contemporary Stented versus Stentless Valves in a Matched Comparison.
    Christ T; Holinski S; Zhigalov K; Zielinski CB; Grubitzsch H
    Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2017 Dec; 23(6):298-303. PubMed ID: 28890465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Do differences in early hemodynamic performance of current generation biologic aortic valves predict outcomes 1 year following surgery?
    Thalji NM; Suri RM; Michelena HI; Greason KL; Dearani JA; Daly RC; Joyce LD; Stulak JM; Burkhart HM; Li Z; Schaff HV
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2015 Jan; 149(1):163-73.e2. PubMed ID: 25439772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Early in-vivo hemodynamic comparison of supra-annular aortic bioprostheses: Trifecta versus Perimount Magna Ease.
    Modi A; Pousios D; Sadeque S; Velissaris T; Barlow C; Livesey S; Tsang GM; Ohri SK
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2014 May; 23(3):325-32. PubMed ID: 25296457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Early single-center experience in sutureless aortic valve implantation in 120 patients.
    Eichstaedt HC; Easo J; Härle T; Dapunt OE
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2014 Jan; 147(1):370-5. PubMed ID: 23473011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of early hemodynamic performance of 3 aortic valve bioprostheses.
    Ugur M; Suri RM; Daly RC; Dearani JA; Park SJ; Joyce LD; Burkhart HM; Greason KL; Schaff HV
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2014 Nov; 148(5):1940-6. PubMed ID: 24530199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Sutureless Perceval aortic valve in comparison with the stented Carpentier-Edwards Perimount aortic valve.
    König KC; Wahlers T; Scherner M; Wippermann J
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2014 Mar; 23(2):253-8. PubMed ID: 25076560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Hemodynamic performance of mitroflow aortic pericardial bioprosthesis - optimizing management for the small aortic annulus.
    Jamieson WR; Forgie WR; Hayden RI; Langlois Y; Ling H; Stanford EA; Roberts KA; Dolman WB
    Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2010 Mar; 58(2):69-75. PubMed ID: 20333567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Impact of small prosthesis size on transcatheter or surgical aortic valve replacement outcomes.
    Salna M; Khalique OK; Chiuzan C; Kurlansky P; Borger MA; Hahn RT; Leon MB; Smith CR; Kodali SK; George I
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2018 Mar; 91(4):765-773. PubMed ID: 28470996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Pericardial and porcine stentless aortic valves: are they hemodynamically different?
    Jin XY; Westaby S
    Ann Thorac Surg; 2001 May; 71(5 Suppl):S311-4. PubMed ID: 11388212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparable long-term results for porcine and pericardial prostheses after isolated aortic valve replacement.
    Andreas M; Wallner S; Ruetzler K; Wiedemann D; Ehrlich M; Heinze G; Binder T; Moritz A; Hiesmayr MJ; Kocher A; Laufer G
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2015 Oct; 48(4):557-61. PubMed ID: 25527170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Hemodynamic performance and clinical outcome of pericardial Perimount Magna and Porcine Hancock-II valves in aortic position.
    Caporali E; Bonato R; Klersy C; Ferrari E
    J Card Surg; 2019 Oct; 34(10):1055-1061. PubMed ID: 31389647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A Matched-Paired Comparative Analysis of the Hemodynamics of the Trifecta and Perimount Aortic Bioprostheses.
    Rubens FD; Rao RV; Chan V; Burwash IG
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2015 Jul; 24(4):487-95. PubMed ID: 26897822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. National trends in utilization and in-hospital outcomes of mechanical versus bioprosthetic aortic valve replacements.
    Isaacs AJ; Shuhaiber J; Salemi A; Isom OW; Sedrakyan A
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2015 May; 149(5):1262-9.e3. PubMed ID: 25791947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The new St Jude Trifecta versus Carpentier-Edwards Perimount Magna and Magna Ease aortic bioprosthesis: is there a hemodynamic superiority?
    Wendt D; Thielmann M; Plicht B; Aßmann J; Price V; Neuhäuser M; Jakob H
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2014 May; 147(5):1553-60. PubMed ID: 23870159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comprehensive hemodynamic comparison and frequency of patient-prosthesis mismatch between the St. Jude Medical Trifecta and Epic Bioprosthetic aortic valves.
    Yadlapati A; Diep J; Barnes M; Grogan T; Bethencourt DM; Vorobiof G
    J Am Soc Echocardiogr; 2014 Jun; 27(6):581-9. PubMed ID: 24534651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Hemodynamic performance evaluation of small aortic ATS Medical valves by Doppler echocardiography.
    Kirzner CF; Vinals B; Moya J; Puente JG; Rabago R; Artiz V; Martinelli J; Fraile-Chief J
    J Heart Valve Dis; 1997 Nov; 6(6):661-5. PubMed ID: 9427139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of Aortic Annulus Dimension After Aortic Valve Neocuspidization With Valve Replacement and Normal Valve.
    Yamamoto Y; Iino K; Shintani Y; Kato H; Kimura K; Watanabe G; Takemura H
    Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2017 Summer; 29(2):143-149. PubMed ID: 28823320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.