332 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16209882)
21. Design and performance of BNR activated sludge systems with flat sheet membranes for solid-liquid separation.
du Toit GJ; Ramphao MC; Parco V; Wentzel MC; Ekama GA
Water Sci Technol; 2007; 56(6):105-13. PubMed ID: 17898449
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Microbial evaluation of activated sludge and filamentous population at eight Czech nutrient removal activated sludge plants during year 2000.
Krhutková O; Ruzicková I; Wanner J
Water Sci Technol; 2002; 46(1-2):471-8. PubMed ID: 12216670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. [Emission of microorganisms from sewage treatment plants depending upon construction differences of single structural parts].
Eikmann T; Schröder S; Pieler J; Bahr H; Einbrodt HJ
Zentralbl Bakteriol Mikrobiol Hyg B Umwelthyg Krankenhaushyg Arbeitshyg Prav Med; 1986 Apr; 182(2):216-36. PubMed ID: 3087104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Modelling the effect of shear history on activated sludge flocculation.
Biggs C; Lant P; Hounslow M
Water Sci Technol; 2003; 47(11):251-7. PubMed ID: 12906297
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Partial ozonation of activated sludge to reduce excess sludge, improve denitrification and control scumming and bulking.
Böhler M; Siegrist H
Water Sci Technol; 2004; 49(10):41-9. PubMed ID: 15259936
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. [Monitoring of aerosol microorganisms in the air of hospital sewage treated by membrane biological reactor].
Nie X; Tang M; Gu P
Wei Sheng Yan Jiu; 2007 May; 36(3):278-82. PubMed ID: 17712938
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Can a wastewater treatment plant be a powerplant? A case study.
Schwarzenbeck N; Pfeiffer W; Bomball E
Water Sci Technol; 2008; 57(10):1555-61. PubMed ID: 18520012
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Towards integrated operation of membrane bioreactors: effects of aeration on biological and filtration performance.
Dalmau M; Monclús H; Gabarrón S; Rodriguez-Roda I; Comas J
Bioresour Technol; 2014 Nov; 171():103-12. PubMed ID: 25189515
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Removal of bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate at a sewage treatment plant.
Marttinen SK; Kettunen RH; Sormunen KM; Rintala JA
Water Res; 2003 Mar; 37(6):1385-93. PubMed ID: 12598201
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Is sludge retention time a decisive factor for aerobic granulation in SBR?
Li Y; Liu Y; Xu H
Bioresour Technol; 2008 Nov; 99(16):7672-7. PubMed ID: 18331793
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Tracking the inorganic suspended solids through biological treatment units of wastewater treatment plants.
Ekama GA; Wentzel MC; Sötemann SW
Water Res; 2006 Nov; 40(19):3587-95. PubMed ID: 16949122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Comparative investigation of airborne culturable microorganisms in sewage treatment plants.
Haas DU; Reinthaler FF; Wüst G; Posch J; Ruckenbauer G; Marth E
Cent Eur J Public Health; 2002 Jun; 10(1-2):6-10. PubMed ID: 12096685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Nutrient removal process development and full scale implementation at the 4 million p.e. main treatment plant of Vienna, Austria.
Kroiss H; Klager F; Winkler S; Wandl G; Svardal K
Water Sci Technol; 2004; 50(7):19-26. PubMed ID: 15553454
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Characteristics of aerobic granular sludge in a sequencing batch reactor with variable aeration.
Liu YQ; Tay JH; Moy BY
Appl Microbiol Biotechnol; 2006 Aug; 71(5):761-6. PubMed ID: 16328444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Experimental design methodology for the preparation of carbonaceous sorbents from sewage sludge by chemical activation--application to air and water treatments.
Rio S; Faur-Brasquet C; Le Coq L; Courcoux P; Le Cloirec P
Chemosphere; 2005 Jan; 58(4):423-37. PubMed ID: 15620734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Removal of endocrine disrupter compounds from municipal wastewater by an innovative biological technology.
Balest L; Mascolo G; Di Iaconi C; Lopez A
Water Sci Technol; 2008; 58(4):953-6. PubMed ID: 18776635
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Cost-effective upgrading of a biological wastewater treatment plant by using lamella separators with bypass operation.
Jardin N; Rath L; Schönfeld A; Grünebaum T
Water Sci Technol; 2008; 57(10):1619-25. PubMed ID: 18520020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Biological nutrient removal in a small-scale MBR treating household wastewater.
Abegglen C; Ospelt M; Siegrist H
Water Res; 2008 Jan; 42(1-2):338-46. PubMed ID: 17707877
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Fate of pathogenic microorganisms and indicators in secondary activated sludge wastewater treatment plants.
Wen Q; Tutuka C; Keegan A; Jin B
J Environ Manage; 2009 Mar; 90(3):1442-7. PubMed ID: 18977580
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Biological nutrient removal in simple dual sludge system with an UMBR (upflow multi-layer bioreactor) and aerobic biofilm reactor.
Kwon JC; Park HS; An JY; Shim KB; Kim YH; Shin HS
Water Sci Technol; 2005; 52(10-11):443-51. PubMed ID: 16459820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
