584 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16210578)
1. Arthroscopic single-row versus double-row suture anchor rotator cuff repair.
Mazzocca AD; Millett PJ; Guanche CA; Santangelo SA; Arciero RA
Am J Sports Med; 2005 Dec; 33(12):1861-8. PubMed ID: 16210578
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A biomechanical comparison of single and double-row fixation in arthroscopic rotator cuff repair.
Smith CD; Alexander S; Hill AM; Huijsmans PE; Bull AM; Amis AA; De Beer JF; Wallace AL
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2006 Nov; 88(11):2425-31. PubMed ID: 17079400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Biomechanical comparison of a single-row versus double-row suture anchor technique for rotator cuff repair.
Kim DH; Elattrache NS; Tibone JE; Jun BJ; DeLaMora SN; Kvitne RS; Lee TQ
Am J Sports Med; 2006 Mar; 34(3):407-14. PubMed ID: 16282581
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A biomechanical comparison of tendon-bone interface motion and cyclic loading between single-row, triple-loaded cuff repairs and double-row, suture-tape cuff repairs using biocomposite anchors.
Barber FA; Drew OR
Arthroscopy; 2012 Sep; 28(9):1197-205. PubMed ID: 22592123
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Failure analysis of rotator cuff repair: a comparison of three double-row techniques.
Zheng N; Harris HW; Andrews JR
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2008 May; 90(5):1034-42. PubMed ID: 18451396
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Equivalent clinical results of arthroscopic single-row and double-row suture anchor repair for rotator cuff tears: a randomized controlled trial.
Franceschi F; Ruzzini L; Longo UG; Martina FM; Zobel BB; Maffulli N; Denaro V
Am J Sports Med; 2007 Aug; 35(8):1254-60. PubMed ID: 17554104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Biomechanical evaluation of arthroscopic rotator cuff repairs: double-row compared with single-row fixation.
Ma CB; Comerford L; Wilson J; Puttlitz CM
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2006 Feb; 88(2):403-10. PubMed ID: 16452754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Single-row modified mason-allen versus double-row arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: a biomechanical and surface area comparison.
Nelson CO; Sileo MJ; Grossman MG; Serra-Hsu F
Arthroscopy; 2008 Aug; 24(8):941-8. PubMed ID: 18657744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparable biomechanical results for a modified single-row rotator cuff reconstruction using triple-loaded suture anchors versus a suture-bridging double-row repair.
Lorbach O; Kieb M; Raber F; Busch LC; Kohn D; Pape D
Arthroscopy; 2012 Feb; 28(2):178-87. PubMed ID: 22112611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The outcome and structural integrity of arthroscopic rotator cuff repair with use of the double-row suture anchor technique. Surgical technique.
Lafosse L; Brzoska R; Toussaint B; Gobezie R
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2008 Oct; 90 Suppl 2 Pt 2():275-86. PubMed ID: 18829940
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Cyclic loading of rotator cuff reconstructions: single-row repair with modified suture configurations versus double-row repair.
Lorbach O; Bachelier F; Vees J; Kohn D; Pape D
Am J Sports Med; 2008 Aug; 36(8):1504-10. PubMed ID: 18296541
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The outcome and structural integrity of arthroscopic rotator cuff repair with use of the double-row suture anchor technique.
Lafosse L; Brozska R; Toussaint B; Gobezie R
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2007 Jul; 89(7):1533-41. PubMed ID: 17606793
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A novel method to determine suture anchor loading after rotator cuff repair--a study of two double-row techniques.
Khoury LD; Kwon YW; Kummer FJ
Bull NYU Hosp Jt Dis; 2010; 68(1):25-8. PubMed ID: 20345359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Tendon-bone interface motion in transosseous suture and suture anchor rotator cuff repair techniques.
Ahmad CS; Stewart AM; Izquierdo R; Bigliani LU
Am J Sports Med; 2005 Nov; 33(11):1667-71. PubMed ID: 16093532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Suture number determines strength of rotator cuff repair.
Jost PW; Khair MM; Chen DX; Wright TM; Kelly AM; Rodeo SA
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2012 Jul; 94(14):e100. PubMed ID: 22810407
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluation of residual rotator cuff defects after in vivo single- versus double-row rotator cuff repairs.
Brady PC; Arrigoni P; Burkhart SS
Arthroscopy; 2006 Oct; 22(10):1070-5. PubMed ID: 17027404
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Biomechanical evaluation of knotless anatomical double-layer double-row rotator cuff repair: a comparative ex vivo study.
Hepp P; Osterhoff G; Engel T; Marquass B; Klink T; Josten C
Am J Sports Med; 2009 Jul; 37(7):1363-9. PubMed ID: 19307331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The effect of dynamic external rotation comparing 2 footprint-restoring rotator cuff repair techniques.
Park MC; Idjadi JA; Elattrache NS; Tibone JE; McGarry MH; Lee TQ
Am J Sports Med; 2008 May; 36(5):893-900. PubMed ID: 18272799
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. In vitro analysis of rotator cuff repairs: a comparison of arthroscopically inserted tacks or anchors with open transosseous repairs.
Chhabra A; Goradia VK; Francke EI; Baer GS; Monahan T; Kline AJ; Miller MD
Arthroscopy; 2005 Mar; 21(3):323-7. PubMed ID: 15756187
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Biomechanical comparison of bioabsorbable sutureless screw anchor versus suture anchor fixation for rotator cuff repair.
Lee S; Mahar A; Bynum K; Pedowitz R
Arthroscopy; 2005 Jan; 21(1):43-7. PubMed ID: 15650665
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
