These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16210825)
1. Autoregressive moving average (ARMA) model applied to quantification of cerebral blood flow using dynamic susceptibility contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging. Murase K; Yamazaki Y; Shinohara M Magn Reson Med Sci; 2003 Jul; 2(2):85-95. PubMed ID: 16210825 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Deconvolution analysis of dynamic contrast-enhanced data based on singular value decomposition optimized by generalized cross validation. Murase K; Yamazaki Y; Miyazaki S Magn Reson Med Sci; 2004; 3(4):165-75. PubMed ID: 16093635 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Accuracy of deconvolution analysis based on singular value decomposition for quantification of cerebral blood flow using dynamic susceptibility contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging. Murase K; Shinohara M; Yamazaki Y Phys Med Biol; 2001 Dec; 46(12):3147-59. PubMed ID: 11768497 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effect of regional tracer delay on CBF in healthy subjects measured with dynamic susceptibility contrast-enhanced MRI: comparison with 15O-PET. Ibaraki M; Shimosegawa E; Toyoshima H; Ishigame K; Ito H; Takahashi K; Miura S; Kanno I Magn Reson Med Sci; 2005; 4(1):27-34. PubMed ID: 16127251 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Cerebral blood flow estimation from perfusion-weighted MRI using FT-based MMSE filtering method. Sakoglu U; Sood R Magn Reson Imaging; 2008 Apr; 26(3):313-22. PubMed ID: 18158225 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Delay and dispersion effects in dynamic susceptibility contrast MRI: simulations using singular value decomposition. Calamante F; Gadian DG; Connelly A Magn Reson Med; 2000 Sep; 44(3):466-73. PubMed ID: 10975900 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. DSC perfusion MRI-Quantification and reduction of systematic errors arising in areas of reduced cerebral blood flow. Carpenter TK; Armitage PA; Bastin ME; Wardlaw JM Magn Reson Med; 2006 Jun; 55(6):1342-9. PubMed ID: 16683256 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Reference-based maximum upslope: a CBF quantification method without using arterial input function in dynamic susceptibility contrast MRI. Kimura T; Kusahara H Magn Reson Med Sci; 2009; 8(3):107-20. PubMed ID: 19783874 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Advantages of frequency-domain modeling in dynamic-susceptibility contrast magnetic resonance cerebral blood flow quantification. Chen JJ; Smith MR; Frayne R Magn Reson Med; 2005 Mar; 53(3):700-7. PubMed ID: 15723395 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Aspects on the accuracy of cerebral perfusion parameters obtained by dynamic susceptibility contrast MRI: a simulation study. Knutsson L; Ståhlberg F; Wirestam R Magn Reson Imaging; 2004 Jul; 22(6):789-98. PubMed ID: 15234447 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Tracer delay correction of cerebral blood flow with dynamic susceptibility contrast-enhanced MRI. Ibaraki M; Shimosegawa E; Toyoshima H; Takahashi K; Miura S; Kanno I J Cereb Blood Flow Metab; 2005 Mar; 25(3):378-90. PubMed ID: 15674238 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A control point interpolation method for the non-parametric quantification of cerebral haemodynamics from dynamic susceptibility contrast MRI. Mehndiratta A; MacIntosh BJ; Crane DE; Payne SJ; Chappell MA Neuroimage; 2013 Jan; 64():560-70. PubMed ID: 22975158 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Dynamic susceptibility contrast MRI with a prebolus contrast agent administration design for improved absolute quantification of perfusion. Knutsson L; Lindgren E; Ahlgren A; van Osch MJ; Bloch KM; Surova Y; Ståhlberg F; van Westen D; Wirestam R Magn Reson Med; 2014 Oct; 72(4):996-1006. PubMed ID: 24285621 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Quantitative assessment of regional cerebral blood flow by dynamic susceptibility contrast-enhanced MRI, without the need for arterial blood signals. Enmi J; Kudomi N; Hayashi T; Yamamoto A; Iguchi S; Moriguchi T; Hori Y; Koshino K; Zeniya T; Jon Shah N; Yamada N; Iida H Phys Med Biol; 2012 Dec; 57(23):7873-92. PubMed ID: 23151851 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]