These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1621144)

  • 1. Radiologic evaluation of dens fracture. Role of plain radiography and tomography.
    Ehara S; el-Khoury GY; Clark CR
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1992 May; 17(5):475-9. PubMed ID: 1621144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Upper cervical spine fracture: sources of misdiagnosis].
    Cusmano F; Ferrozzi F; Uccelli M; Bassi S
    Radiol Med; 1999 Oct; 98(4):230-5. PubMed ID: 10615359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The role and limitations of computed tomographic scanning in the evaluation of cervical trauma.
    Woodring JH; Lee C
    J Trauma; 1992 Nov; 33(5):698-708. PubMed ID: 1464919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. False-negative plain cervical spine x-rays in blunt trauma.
    Besman A; Kaban J; Jacobs L; Jacobs LM
    Am Surg; 2003 Nov; 69(11):1010-4. PubMed ID: 14627267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Radiologic diagnosis of cervical spine injuries].
    Schweighofer F; Grechenig W; Passler JM; Ranner G; Wildburger R
    Unfallchirurg; 1992 Jun; 95(6):288-91. PubMed ID: 1636107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Are plain radiographs of the spine necessary during evaluation after blunt trauma? Accuracy of screening torso computed tomography in thoracic/lumbar spine fracture diagnosis.
    Berry GE; Adams S; Harris MB; Boles CA; McKernan MG; Collinson F; Hoth JJ; Meredith JW; Chang MC; Miller PR
    J Trauma; 2005 Dec; 59(6):1410-3; discussion 1413. PubMed ID: 16394914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Prospective evaluation of multislice computed tomography versus plain radiographic cervical spine clearance in trauma patients.
    Mathen R; Inaba K; Munera F; Teixeira PG; Rivas L; McKenney M; Lopez P; Ledezma CJ
    J Trauma; 2007 Jun; 62(6):1427-31. PubMed ID: 17563660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Reliability and reproducibility of dens fracture classification with use of plain radiography and reformatted computer-aided tomography.
    Barker L; Anderson J; Chesnut R; Nesbit G; Tjauw T; Hart R
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2006 Jan; 88(1):106-12. PubMed ID: 16391255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Lateral flexion/extension radiographs: still recommended following cervical spinal injury.
    Fricker R; Gächter A
    Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 1994; 113(2):115-6. PubMed ID: 8186047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Predictors of Vertebral Artery Injury in Isolated C2 Fractures Based on Fracture Morphology Using CT Angiography.
    Durand D; Wu X; Kalra VB; Abbed KM; Malhotra A
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2015 Jun; 40(12):E713-8. PubMed ID: 25803220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The inefficiency of plain radiography to evaluate the cervical spine after blunt trauma.
    Gale SC; Gracias VH; Reilly PM; Schwab CW
    J Trauma; 2005 Nov; 59(5):1121-5. PubMed ID: 16385289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Radiographic evaluation of cervical spine trauma. Plain radiography and conventional tomography versus computed tomography.
    Bach CM; Steingruber IE; Peer S; Peer-Kühberger R; Jaschke W; Ogon M
    Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2001 Jul; 121(7):385-7. PubMed ID: 11510902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Prospective evaluation of computed tomographic scanning for the spinal clearance of obtunded trauma patients: preliminary results.
    Widder S; Doig C; Burrowes P; Larsen G; Hurlbert RJ; Kortbeek JB
    J Trauma; 2004 Jun; 56(6):1179-84. PubMed ID: 15211122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Adequacy of plain radiography in the diagnosis of cervical spine injuries.
    Nguyen GK; Clark R
    Emerg Radiol; 2005 Apr; 11(3):158-61. PubMed ID: 15568161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Sagittally oriented fractures of the lateral masses of the cervical vertebrae.
    Lee C; Woodring JH
    J Trauma; 1991 Dec; 31(12):1638-43. PubMed ID: 1749036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Limitations of cervical radiography in the evaluation of acute cervical trauma.
    Woodring JH; Lee C
    J Trauma; 1993 Jan; 34(1):32-9. PubMed ID: 8437193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Computed tomographic scanning of cervical spine fractures: does it influence treatment?
    Katz MA; Beredjiklian PK; Vresilovic EJ; Tahernia AD; Gabriel JP; Chan PS; Heppenstall RB
    J Orthop Trauma; 1999; 13(5):338-43. PubMed ID: 10406700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Cervical spinal injuries in craniocerebral trauma: their x-ray diagnosis on the day of the accident].
    Schnarkowski P; Friedrich JM; Arand M; Mutschler W
    Rofo; 1991 Jun; 154(6):605-9. PubMed ID: 1648762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. "Artifactual fracture-subluxation" of cervical spine in computed tomography screening sans plain radiographs.
    Dhandapani S; Salunke P; Mukherjee KK
    Spine J; 2013 Nov; 13(11):e45-8. PubMed ID: 24017957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Surgical versus nonsurgical treatment of subaxial cervical pedicle fractures.
    Awad BI; Lubelski D; Carmody M; Mroz TE; Anderson JS; Moore TA; Steinmetz MP
    World Neurosurg; 2014 Nov; 82(5):855-65. PubMed ID: 24907437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.