These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16212297)

  • 1. Comparison of NIDEK CATz wavefront-guided LASIK to traditional LASIK with the NIDEK CXII excimer laser in myopia.
    He R; Qu M; Yu S
    J Refract Surg; 2005; 21(5 Suppl):S646-9. PubMed ID: 16212297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Bilateral comparison of conventional versus topographic-guided customized ablation for myopic LASIK with the NIDEK EC-5000.
    Du CX; Yang YB; Shen Y; Wang Y; Dougherty PJ
    J Refract Surg; 2006 Sep; 22(7):642-6. PubMed ID: 16995545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Topographic- and wavefront-guided customized ablations with the NIDEK-EC5000CXII in LASIK for myopia.
    Kermani O; Schmiedt K; Oberheide U; Gerten G
    J Refract Surg; 2006 Oct; 22(8):754-63. PubMed ID: 17061712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Topography-guided CATz versus conventional LASIK for myopia with the NIDEK EC-5000: A bilateral eye study.
    Farooqui MA; Al-Muammar AR
    J Refract Surg; 2006 Oct; 22(8):741-5. PubMed ID: 17061710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Wavefront-guided LASIK with the NIDEK NAVEX platform for the correction of myopia and myopic astigmatism with 6-month follow-up.
    Venter J
    J Refract Surg; 2005; 21(5 Suppl):S640-5. PubMed ID: 16212296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Clinical outcomes of CATz versus OPDCAT.
    Pop M; Bains HS
    J Refract Surg; 2005; 21(5 Suppl):S636-9. PubMed ID: 16212295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of conventional versus wavefront-guided laser in situ keratomileusis in the same patient.
    Phusitphoykai N; Tungsiripat T; Siriboonkoom J; Vongthongsri A
    J Refract Surg; 2003; 19(2 Suppl):S217-20. PubMed ID: 12699175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of high order aberration after conventional and customized ablation in myopic LASIK in different eyes of the same patient.
    Du CX; Shen Y; Wang Y
    J Zhejiang Univ Sci B; 2007 Mar; 8(3):177-80. PubMed ID: 17323429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Visual Outcomes After LASIK Using Topography-Guided vs Wavefront-Guided Customized Ablation Systems.
    Toda I; Ide T; Fukumoto T; Tsubota K
    J Refract Surg; 2016 Nov; 32(11):727-732. PubMed ID: 27824375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of conventional and OATz ablation profiles for laser in situ keratomileusis to correct myopia up to -10.00 diopters.
    Vongthongsri A; Phusitphoykai N; Siriboonkoom J
    J Refract Surg; 2004; 20(5 Suppl):S674-5. PubMed ID: 15521265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Topographically guided LASIK for myopia using the Nidek CXII customized aspheric treatment zone (CATz).
    Waring G; Dougherty PJ; Chayet A; Fischer J; Fant B; Stevens G; Bains HS
    Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc; 2007; 105():240-6; discussion 247-8. PubMed ID: 18427614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Retreatment after wavefront-guided and standard myopic LASIK.
    Jin GJ; Merkley KH
    Ophthalmology; 2006 Sep; 113(9):1623-8. PubMed ID: 16828506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Topography-guided versus wavefront-optimized laser in situ keratomileusis for myopia: Surgical outcomes.
    Kim J; Choi SH; Lim DH; Yang CM; Yoon GJ; Chung TY
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2019 Jul; 45(7):959-965. PubMed ID: 31196580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Wavefront-guided multipoint (segmental) custom ablation enhancement using the Nidek NAVEX platform.
    Gimbel HV; Sofinski SJ; Mahler OS; van Westenbrugge JA; Ferensowicz MI; Triebwasser RW
    J Refract Surg; 2003; 19(2 Suppl):S209-16. PubMed ID: 12699174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Laser in situ keratomileusis for high myopia using a small ablation zone and large aspheric transition zone.
    Vongthongsri A; Phusitphoykai N; Tungsiriput T
    J Refract Surg; 2004; 20(5 Suppl):S669-73. PubMed ID: 15521264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of visual and refractive outcomes following femtosecond laser- assisted lasik with smile in patients with myopia or myopic astigmatism.
    Ganesh S; Gupta R
    J Refract Surg; 2014 Sep; 30(9):590-6. PubMed ID: 25250415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A Randomized Comparative Study of Topography-Guided Versus Wavefront-Optimized FS-LASIK for Correcting Myopia and Myopic Astigmatism.
    Zhang Y; Chen Y
    J Refract Surg; 2019 Sep; 35(9):575-582. PubMed ID: 31498415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of the visual results after SMILE and femtosecond laser-assisted LASIK for myopia.
    Lin F; Xu Y; Yang Y
    J Refract Surg; 2014 Apr; 30(4):248-54. PubMed ID: 24702576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Wavefront-guided versus wavefront-optimized laser in situ keratomileusis for patients with myopia: a prospective randomized contralateral eye study.
    He L; Liu A; Manche EE
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2014 Jun; 157(6):1170-1178.e1. PubMed ID: 24560995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Comparison of visual acuity and higher-order aberrations after standard and wavefront-guided myopic femtosecond LASIK].
    Anderle R; Ventruba J; Š S
    Cesk Slov Oftalmol; 2015 Jan; 71(1):44-50. PubMed ID: 25959784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.