These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16212336)
1. New double-door laminoplasty procedure for the axis to preserve all muscular attachments to the spinous process: technical note. Shiraishi T; Yato Y Neurosurg Focus; 2002 Jan; 12(1):E9. PubMed ID: 16212336 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Outcomes after laminoplasty compared with laminectomy and fusion in patients with cervical myelopathy: a systematic review. Yoon ST; Hashimoto RE; Raich A; Shaffrey CI; Rhee JM; Riew KD Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2013 Oct; 38(22 Suppl 1):S183-94. PubMed ID: 23963000 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Laminoplasty outcomes: is there a difference between patients with degenerative stenosis and those with ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament? Meyer SA; Wu JC; Mummaneni PV Neurosurg Focus; 2011 Mar; 30(3):E9. PubMed ID: 21361755 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Long-term results of double-door laminoplasty for cervical stenotic myelopathy. Seichi A; Takeshita K; Ohishi I; Kawaguchi H; Akune T; Anamizu Y; Kitagawa T; Nakamura K Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2001 Mar; 26(5):479-87. PubMed ID: 11242374 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The impact of dynamic factors on surgical outcomes after double-door laminoplasty for ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament of the cervical spine. Maruo K; Moriyama T; Tachibana T; Inoue S; Arizumi F; Daimon T; Yoshiya S J Neurosurg Spine; 2014 Dec; 21(6):938-43. PubMed ID: 25279653 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Dorsal versus ventral surgery for cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament: considerations for approach selection and review of surgical outcomes. Shin JH; Steinmetz MP; Benzel EC; Krishnaney AA Neurosurg Focus; 2011 Mar; 30(3):E8. PubMed ID: 21434824 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Addition of instrumented fusion after posterior decompression surgery suppresses thickening of ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament of the cervical spine. Ota M; Furuya T; Maki S; Inada T; Kamiya K; Ijima Y; Saito J; Takahashi K; Yamazaki M; Aramomi M; Mannoji C; Koda M J Clin Neurosci; 2016 Dec; 34():162-165. PubMed ID: 27473022 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Expansive laminoplasty for myelopathy in ossification of the longitudinal ligament. Hirabayashi K; Toyama Y; Chiba K Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1999 Feb; (359):35-48. PubMed ID: 10078127 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Surgical treatment for ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament in the cervical spine. An HS; Al-Shihabi L; Kurd M J Am Acad Orthop Surg; 2014 Jul; 22(7):420-9. PubMed ID: 24966248 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Treatment of myelopathy due to cervicothoracic OPLL via open door laminoplasty. Komagata M; Inahata Y; Nishiyama M; Endo K; Tanaka H; Kobayashi H J Spinal Disord Tech; 2007 Jul; 20(5):342-6. PubMed ID: 17607097 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. "Spring-back" closure associated with open-door cervical laminoplasty. Wang HQ; Mak KC; Samartzis D; El-Fiky T; Wong YW; Luo ZJ; Kang X; Cheung WY; Luk KD; Cheung KM Spine J; 2011 Sep; 11(9):832-8. PubMed ID: 21890423 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of clinical outcomes between laminoplasty, posterior decompression with instrumented fusion, and anterior decompression with fusion for K-line (-) cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament. Koda M; Mochizuki M; Konishi H; Aiba A; Kadota R; Inada T; Kamiya K; Ota M; Maki S; Takahashi K; Yamazaki M; Mannoji C; Furuya T Eur Spine J; 2016 Jul; 25(7):2294-301. PubMed ID: 27072553 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Open-door laminoplasty with suture anchor fixation for cervical myelopathy in ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament. Yang SC; Yu SW; Tu YK; Niu CC; Chen LH; Chen WJ J Spinal Disord Tech; 2007 Oct; 20(7):492-8. PubMed ID: 17912125 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. New double-door laminoplasty procedures to preserve the muscular attachments to the spinous processes including the axis. Shiraishi T; Yato Y; Yoshida H; Abe T; Ikegami T Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol; 2002 Dec; 12(4):175-80. PubMed ID: 27476176 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Contact of hydroxyapatite spacers with split spinous processes in double-door laminoplasty for cervical myelopathy. Hirabayashi S; Kumano K J Orthop Sci; 1999; 4(4):264-8. PubMed ID: 10436273 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Cervical malalignment after laminoplasty: relationship to deep extensor musculature of the cervical spine and neurological outcome. Iizuka H; Nakajima T; Iizuka Y; Sorimachi Y; Ara T; Nishinome M; Takagishi K J Neurosurg Spine; 2007 Dec; 7(6):610-4. PubMed ID: 18074685 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effect of posterior decompression extent on biomechanical parameters of the spinal cord in cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament. Khuyagbaatar B; Kim K; Park WM; Kim YH Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2016 Jun; 230(6):545-52. PubMed ID: 26951839 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Surgical strategy for multilevel severe ossification of posterior longitudinal ligament in the cervical spine. Chen Y; Guo Y; Lu X; Chen D; Song D; Shi J; Yuan W J Spinal Disord Tech; 2011 Feb; 24(1):24-30. PubMed ID: 20924295 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Correlation between cervical spine sagittal alignment and clinical outcome after cervical laminoplasty for ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament. Lee CK; Shin DA; Yi S; Kim KN; Shin HC; Yoon DH; Ha Y J Neurosurg Spine; 2016 Jan; 24(1):100-7. PubMed ID: 26431070 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]